Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Instrumentation, operational shield

Documentation of the tests should also be provided by still photography, video camera/recorder systems, and high speed photography. The high speed photography with a minimum speed of 500 frames per second Is necessary to be able to see any flame front exiting a shield. A list of typical Instrumentation used on an operational shield test Is shown on Table II, (see reference A). [Pg.299]

As the screening effect increases, the nuclei are said to be shielded on a continuous wave instrument operating at fixed frequency, the intensity of the field B0 has to be increased in order to obtain resonance. Signals to the right of the spectrum are said to be resonant at high field. Signals observed to the left of the spectrum correspond to deshielded nuclei and are said to be resonant at low field (Fig. 9.11). [Pg.139]

The idea of using CPCM for shielding is rather alluring. Indeed, a casing of an article or instrument manufactured of such a material serves at the same time as a screen to protect against electromagnetic radiation. All the above-described operations involved in applying additional layers become unnecessary. [Pg.143]

Enclosures Enclose room or equipment and place under negative pressure. Enclose hazardous operations such as sample points. Seal rooms, sewers, ventilation, and the like. Use analyzers and instruments to observe inside equipment. Shield high-temperature surfaces. Pneumatically convey dusty material. [Pg.95]

Shielding The potential of the mobile phase in the cell may be influenced by electric field changes near the three electrode system. These changes may originate from motions of a statically charged operator or from electrically operated instruments in the vicinity of the detector. [Pg.41]

LITs capable of scanning, axial or radial excitation of ions, and precursor ion selection for MS/MS experiments [118,134-136] have lately been incorporated in commercial mass spectrometers (Fig. 4.39). The replacement of Q3 in a QqQ instrument with a scanning LIT, for example, enhances its sensitivity and offers new modes of operation (Applied Biosystems Q-Trap). Introduction of a scanning LIT [118,135] as MSI in front of an FT-ICR instrument (Thermo Electron LTQ-FT) shields the ultrahigh vacuum of the FT-ICR from collision gas and decomposition products in order to operate under optimum conditions. In addition, the LIT accumulates and eventually mass-selects ions for the next cycle while the ICR cell is still busy with the previous ion package. [Pg.154]

The complete instrument consists of two flippers with distance L before the sample and a symmetric set of two flippers after the sample. All flight paths between the first and the fourth (last) flipper are surrounded by magnetic shielding to yield the zero field condition that preserves the spin orientation. All RF flippers are operated synchronously, i.e. with the same current. Their field direction (i.e. rotation) is +, +. A neutron that enters the first flipper at a time... [Pg.20]

The excitation lamp is enclosed within a compartment which is designed to shield the detector and its associated electronic circuits from the heat generated by the lamp. A small fan flushes cool air into the upper compartment that houses the detection devices. The trigger mounted at the instrument s handle is used to operate a dual shutter that opens and closes the excitation and emission apertures simultaneously. The hand-held instrument is low cost (a/ 2,000), simple to operate, and weighs only a little over 1 kg without the power supply ( 5 kg). A photograph of the prototype instrument is shown in Figure 2. [Pg.271]

Electrical safety. Most common commercial instruments have been certified for electrical safety by an organization such as UL (Underwriters Laboratory), CE, or CSA (Canadian Standards Association). However, certain less common instruments or custom-built instruments may have to go through a certification process at the time of installation. Certification required for electrical safety may take time to complete. A protective shield or casing may be required for automated systems with robotic arms for sample manipulation, to protect operators. [Pg.146]

Microdielectrometry was introduced as a research method in 1981 14 and became commercially available in 1983 20). The microdielectrometry instrumentation combines the pair of field-effect transistors on the sensor chip (see Sect. 2.2.3) with external electronics to measure the transfer function H(co) of Eq. (2-18). Because the transistors on the sensor chip function as the input amplifier to the meter, cable admittance and shielding problems are greatly reduced. In addition, the use of a charge measurement rather than the admittance measurement allows the measurements to be made at arbitrarily low frequencies. As a matter of practice, reaction rates in cure studies limits the lowest useful frequency to about 0.1 Hz however, pre-cure or post-cure studies can be made to as low as 0.005 Hz. Finally, the differential connection used for the two transistors provides first-order cancellation of the effects of temperature and pressure on the transistor operation. The devices can be used for cure measurements to 300 °C, and at pressures to 200 psi. [Pg.14]

As mentioned in the section of modes of operation for LC-NMR (Section 20.3.2), with the use of shielded cryomagnets, the location of the MS instrument will follow the same rule as for the HPLC. The most common modes of operation for LC-MS-NMR are on-flow and stop-flow. With stop-flow, the MS instrument can also be used to stop the flow on the chromatographic peak of interest that is to be analyzed by NMR. These two modes are presented here with an example. In the loop collection mode, the MS of the LC-MS-NMR system may also monitor the trapping of the chromatographic peak inside the loop. [Pg.917]

NOTE The P-particle source is 12 mCi of Ni electroplated on an electrode. Even though P-particles penetrate only 8-10 cm of air and the detector cover completely shields the source, in the U.S. this is considered to be a radioactive source and cannot be discarded when the instrument wears out. It must be labeled as being radioactive, it must be tested twice a year by wipe tests, and it must be sent to a licensed operator if it needs cleaning. It must be disposed of separately as a radioactive source and a record kept for its entire lifetime. This is not considered trivial by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), even though common sense indicates otherwise. [Pg.234]


See other pages where Instrumentation, operational shield is mentioned: [Pg.124]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.938]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.910]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.232]   


SEARCH



Instrumental shielding

Instrumentation, operational shield tests

Operational shields

© 2024 chempedia.info