Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Inhibitor determination

Any examination of crystal structures of complexes of a series of ligands binding to a protein (the set of complexes of thermolysin with a variety of inhibitors determined in the Brian Mathews lab, for example see references in DePriest et al. [36]) shows clearly a major limitation of the pharmacophore assumption. Ligands do not optimize overlap of similar chemical functionality in complexes but find a way to maintain correct hydrogenbonding geometry, for example, while accommodating other molecular interactions. [Pg.9]

The above two examples serve to illustrate that more severe conditions of gas recovery require large expense in thermodynamic inhibitors. The high pressure and high water production at Canyon Express and the steeply upward sloping lines and subfreezing temperatures of Ormen Lange are harbingers of more severe conditions in the future. There are some cases in which the cost of hydrate inhibitors determine the project viability. [Pg.657]

G.A. Evtugyn, H.C. Budnikov and E.B. Nikolskaya, Influence of surface-active compounds on the response of cholinesterase biosensors for inhibitor determination, Analyst, 121 (1996) 1911-1915. [Pg.328]

Dowex 1x4 resulted in the largest decrease of all inhibitors determined, which is in agreement with the high increase in fermentability. [Pg.536]

Amazaki TY, Hinck AP, Wang XY, Nicholson LK, Torchia DA, Wingfield P, Stahl SJ, Kaufman JD, Chang CH, Domaille PJ, Lam PY, Three-dimensional solution structure of the HIV-1 protease complexed with DMP323, a novel cyclic urea-type inhibitor, determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Protein Sci., 5 495-506, 1996. [Pg.74]

Modifications for efflux inhibition studies are as frequent as efflux studies and include all parts of the method (permeability time, inhibitors, determination of Papp at single time point versus several time points). [Pg.452]

G. Wagner, W. Braun, T. F. Havel, T. Schaumann, N. Go, and K. Wiithrich, /. Mol. Biol., 196, 611 (1987). Protein Structures in Solution by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Distance Geometry The Polypeptide Fold of the Basic Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor Determined Using Two Different Algorithms. DISGEO and DISMAN. [Pg.168]

The fold of the serine protease domain-type was described in Section V.C. SCP is more like o-lytic protease (Fujinaga et al, 1985) than a-chymotrypsin (Matthews et al, 1967), but with loops that are even shorter (Fig. 4 see Color Insert). Unlike the other proteases, there are no disulfide bonds. The structure of the C terminus is completely different from either of the other two proteases, and it leaves the final three amino acids in the active site. These superimpose on the structure of a peptide inhibitor determined as a complex with o-lytic protease (Bone et al, 1987). This indicates that the N-terminal product of the autocatalytic lysis of... [Pg.157]

TABLE 20.3 Isofornns of moroamine oxidase MAO-A and MAO-B an explanation The table shows the definition of the isoforms b/ their specific substrates, and then their selectivity (or non selectivity) towards a number of other substrates and inhibitors. Determination of therapeutic and adverse effects is a function of selectivity of the inhibitor and the tissue location of the enzyme. ... [Pg.426]

Budnikov M.C. and Evtugyn G.A., 1998. Sensitivity and selectivity of electrochemical biosensors for inhibitor determination. In Biosensors for Direct Monitoring of Environmental Pollutants in Field, D. Nikolelis, U. Krull, J. Wang and M. Mascini (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp. 239-53. [Pg.153]

Biosensors for inhibitor determination are based on the ability of inhibiting substances to become bound to the receptor component and decelerate the substrate conversion. Therefore, inhibitor sensors, similar to apoenzyme sensors and immunosensors, combine the affinity principle with enzymatic amplification reactions. In contrast to metabolism sensors, the binding is evaluated rather than the chemical reaction of the analyte. [Pg.260]

Organophosphorus compounds are irreversible inhibitors of acetylcholine esterase and butyrylcholine esterase (BuChe, EC 3.1.1.8) because the phosphate group is irreversibly bound by the enzyme. Therefore, organophosphorus pesticides can be detected by using the free enzyme. Since the activity of cholinesterases (ChE) in normal serum is rather large (800 UA), untreated serum pools may be employed for inhibitor determination. Gruss and Scheller (1987) have shown that the hydrolysis of butyrylthiocholine iodide can be directly indicated at a membrane-covered platinum electrode polarized to +470 mV. Twenty seconds after sample addition a steady value proportional to the enzyme activity was obtained in the differentiated current-time curve. Injection of an inhibitor decreased the rate of thiocholine formation, so that the residual activity could be evaluated after 30 s (Fig. 115). [Pg.262]

Inhibitors determined for the controlling enzymes involved in cell chemistry have been listed elsewhere (Hoffman, 1999, Table A-1 through Table A-3 of Appendix A), as obtained from Jain s Handbook of Enzyme Inhibitors (1982) and Zollner s Handbook of Enzyme Inhibitors (1993). The breakdown is for glycolysis, lactate formation, and glutaminolysis. Some of the more common and simpler chemicals or compounds serving as enzyme inhibitors for one or another of the various reactiou steps are as follows, as derived from the Jain and Zollner references. Many more, natural or synthetic, no doubt remain to be discovered, as both the Jain and Zollner references are dated. The sequences presented here parallel those presented by Hoffman (1999). [Pg.104]

The application of competition schemes realized by coupled enzyme reactions also provides access to analytes not determinable with usual enzyme electrodes. Here the analytical information is gained either from the competitive action of two enzymes, of which one produces the signal, on the same substrate or from the competition of the analyte with the substrate for the same (signal generating) enzyme, the latter approach resembling that of inhibitor determination. [Pg.445]

The aggregate state of the inhibitor determines its impregnation procedure into the polymer matrix. [Pg.42]

Reverter. D. Femandez-Catalan, C. Baumgartner. R. Pfandler, R. Huber, R. Bode, W. Vendrell. J. Holak. T.A. Aviles, F.X. Structure of a novel leech carboxypeptidase inhibitor determined free in solution and in complex with human carboxypeptidase A2. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 7. 322-328. [Pg.188]

There are two main inhibition types that one can use for inhibitor determinations, competitive and noncompetitive inhibitions. In case of competitive inhibition, inhibitors structurally related to the substrate may be bound to the enzyme active center and compete with the substrate. Because the formation of the complex between the enzyme and the inhibitor is a reversible reaction, the inhibitor can be displaced by a high concentration of the normal substrate. In the case of noncompetitive inhibition, the inhibitor combines with the enzyme at a site that is often different from the substrate binding site, and as a result inhibits the formation of the product by the breakdown of the normal enzyme-substrate complex. It is generally not reversed by the addition of excess substrate. [Pg.1152]

Picture 6.2 Superposition of the Vanderbiit (green) and AbbVie (cyan and magenta) MCL-1 inhibitors, determined by X-ray crystallography. (Reproduced with permission from Practical Fragments [89].)... [Pg.151]

At each enzyme concentration, there is a corresponding calibration curve, whose linear region can be used for inhibitor determination. As the immobilized enzyme concentration increases, the linear region of the curve undergoes a translation towards higher inhibitor concentrations (NaF). Consequently, the detection limit of a biosensor designed for inhibitor determination drops with the concentration of immolnlized enzyme. In reality, the residual activity of the enzyme after immobilization determines the electrode response [132]. This can be... [Pg.81]

Figure 8.6. Flow injection analysis using a biosensor for inhibitor determination. Figure 8.6. Flow injection analysis using a biosensor for inhibitor determination.
Figure 8.7. Typical flow-injection peaks during inhibitor determination. Figure 8.7. Typical flow-injection peaks during inhibitor determination.
Tran-Minh C. and Kumaran S. (1990) Comparative study of different enzyme immobilisation techniques suitable for inhibitor determination. Biosensors VO, Singapore. [Pg.189]

Tran-Minh C. and Beaux J. (1979) Enzyme electrodes for inhibitors determination urease-fluoride system. Anal. Chem., 51, 91-95. [Pg.197]

Evtugyn GA, Budnikov HC, Nikolskaya EB (1998) Sensitivity and selectivity of electrochemical enzyme sensors for inhibitor determination. Talanta 46 465 84... [Pg.303]

Budnikov GK, Evtyugin GA (1996) Electrochemical biosensors for inhibitor determination selectivity and sensitivity control. Electroanalysis 8 817-820... [Pg.303]


See other pages where Inhibitor determination is mentioned: [Pg.236]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.619]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.1151]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.215]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.127 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.80 , Pg.81 , Pg.82 , Pg.83 , Pg.84 , Pg.85 , Pg.86 , Pg.87 , Pg.88 , Pg.89 , Pg.90 , Pg.171 ]




SEARCH



Biosensor Calibration for Determination of Inhibitors

Determination enzyme inhibitor

Determination of T Using Tight Binding Inhibitors

Determining Inhibition Modality for Slow Binding Inhibitors

Determining Modality for Tight Binding Enzyme Inhibitors

© 2024 chempedia.info