Individual effects assessment

The effects of data spread should be examined for all individual parameters. These individual effects usually take place simultaneously, and the combined effect is assessed using the root—sum—square (RSS) method. The total additional surface area required to obtain a certain level of design confidence is calculated from... 

The n t effect of the presence of other elements is conveniently assessed by comparing the intensity of the analytical line in their presence with the intensity calculated from Equation 7-1. The net effect may be to increase the intensity over that calculated (positive), or to decrease it (negative). Individual effects may result from the following causes (1) Presence of an element with absorption coefficient smaller than that of E positive absorption effect). (2) The reverse of this situation negative absorption effect). (3) Presence of an element a characteristic line... 

An effective assessment of the environmental impact of PCBs should consider the individual isomers that make up the PCB mixtures. This opinion is supported by several authors [358,363,368,377-380], indicating that ... 

Assessing the impact of a pollutant is difficult because its effects can be complex and take a long time to develop. This is the result of the multitude of pathways that a pollutant can move through once it has entered the marine environment, as illustrated in Figure 28.1. With so many pollutants present, synergistic effects often occur in which the pollutants interact such that their combined impact are greater than a simple addition of their individual effects. 

As described in detail in this book, the use of assessment factors is an established practice in chemical risk assessment to account for uncertainties inherent in the hazard (effects) assessment and consequently, inherent in the risk assessment. The use of assessment factors to address this uncertainty is part of the conventional approach that has developed over the years. According to the current risk assessment paradigm, the usual approach is simply to multiply these individual assessment factors in order to establish an overall composite numerical assessment factor (Section 5.10). An alternative to the traditional assessment factor approach is to combine estimates of the ranges that these factors may encompass through a probabilistic assessment this is essentially a variation of the standard paradigm. 

Careful construction of the conceptual model diagram, and the use of a tabular approach such as Table 2.1, should help to avoid these problems. The diagram should show clearly the point at which individual exposure is used to predict individual effects and the process by which individual effects are aggregated to generate the risk estimate. In addition, it should be remembered that the risk estimate may be combined quantitatively or qualitatively with other lines of evidence to address the assessment endpoint. 

The presence of multiple stressors also influences the selection of assessment end points. When it is possible to select one assessment end point that is sensitive to many of the identified stressors, yet responds in different ways to different stressors, it is possible to consider the combined effects of multiple stressors while still discriminating among effects. For example, if recruitment of a fish population is the assessment end point, it is important to recognize that recruitment may be adversely affected at several life stages, in different habitats, through different ways, by different stressors. The measures of effect, exposure, and ecosystem and receptor characteristics chosen to evaluate recruitment provide a basis for discriminating among different stressors, individual effects, and their combined effect. 

Transgenic tobacco plants were treated at different temperatures (60-90°C) and at different levels of ammonia (0.5 1, 0.7 1, and 1 1 kg of ammonia kg of dry tobacco sample) to assess the individual effect of each AFEX variable on the Elcd enzymatic activity. All results are the mean of two replicates, and they have been compared with the untreated transgenic tobacco sample. In all the runs the moisture contents are based on the sample dry weight. 

Risk assessment is an empirically based process that estimates the risk of adverse health effects from exposure of an individual or population to a chemical, physical, or biological agent or property. The health risk assessment process involves the following steps hazard identification, effects assessment (dose-response assessment), exposure assessment, and risk characterization (Van Leeuwen and Vermeire 2007). 

A primary directive of CERCLA is the protection of public health. Because the hazards that exist at Superfund sites tend to be quite variable, it has not been possible to establish specific cleanup criteria for the hazardous substances regulated under CERCLA potential human health effects must be evaluated by quantitative risk assessment on a site-by-site basis. Each Superfund site is assessed individually to determine how clean is clean. The rationale is that the hazard of a contaminant is a function of its potential to reach a receptor (e.g., groundwater, population) and the potential harm to the exposed receptor. The ability of a contaminant to migrate, its potential to degrade, and its distance to a receptor of concern (i.e., the risk), all are site-specific. Only on the basis of such individualized risk assessment is it possible to achieve efficient and cost-effective cleanup of the thousands of hazardous waste sites throughout the US. 

To fulfill what I conceive to be my task here I must examine the trends in mortality from these and other infections from 1935 until the present day. Here it is difficult to keep within the strict limits of the subject, because what has happened is due not only to sulfonamides and other synthetic drugs, but to antibiotics, most of which are natural products and thus outside our scope. From about 1945, when penicillin came into general use in most countries, the share of the sulfonamides in what has been achieved can no longer be assessed. Thereafter the choice of effective drugs, and particularly antibiotics, became so wide that their individual effects, or indeed those of antibiotics and synthetics as groups, are impossible to distinguish. The result can only be credited to chemo-therapeutics as a whole, scores of which are now available, any one of which would have been a godsend in earlier days. 

Many patients with type 2 diabetes and therefore with multiple health issues may be able to handle changes only one step at a time. The long-term therapeutic action plan will, however, require multiple steps but the plan needs to be gradually developed by the physician and the patient together based upon individualized risk assessment, digestible evidence-based information, empathetic motivation and realistic tradeoffs related to benefits and potential undesired effects of the intervention. 

At the start of implementing our change strategy, our senior leaders underwent a self-assessment of their individual effectiveness as leaders in two areas personal behavior and results in diversity and inclusion. Each leader developed a personal action plan to close any m or gaps identified. Performance improvement plans linking a portion of pay to diversity outcomes were implemented and tracked. 

---