Hydrodynamics test materials

As noted above, the mass transfer kinetics of temperature gradient loops are usually described with reference to dissolution in the hot leg. It is possible to quantitatively study the dissolution step using the rotating cylinder technique. Unlike loop studies, this technique allows one to study dissolution in a system where the hydrodynamic conditions are fully defined. Experimentally, solid cylinders of the test material are rotated at various speeds in an isothermal liquid-metal bath. Changes in the concentration of solid in the liquid and changes in the cylinder radius are determined as a function of time. With these data it is possible to determine the mass transfer coefficient and the rate-controlling step for dissolution. 

Over the past two decades several devices have been developed to measure and characterize the adhesive interaction of cells with biomaterials, particles, and other cells. These devices share the common experimental strategy that nonadherent spherical cells are allowed to establish adhesive contacts to the test material under quiescent conditions and then are subjected to a weU-defined distractive force. From the examination of large numbers of cells over a range of distractive forces, a probability distribution for cell adhesion as a function of distractive force can be constructed (Figure 34.3). From this distribution, an adhesion characteristic (e.g., T50, the shear stress necessary to detach 50% of the cells [47,86-88] maybe determined. The primary differences between the various devices for measuring cell adhesion is the type of distractive force that is applied (e.g., membrane tension, buoyancy, and hydrodynamic shear stress) and the direction of the force relative to the plane of cell/surface contacts. 

Larger Scale Testing. The standard card gap test (2) is test No. 1 of a series of larger scale tests designed to determine the sensitivity of liquid propellants to hydrodynamic shock. In this test, relative sensitivities of various propellants are determined in terms of the number of 0.01-inch thick cellulose acetate cards required to attenuate a standard shock sufficiently just to prevent initiation in the test sample. When performed according to the exacting conditions of apparatus and procedure, the results are very reproducible from one laboratory to another. However, small variations in the apparatus or procedure can cause major variations in the resulting data, and therefore the test can be considered only relative. A major drawback of the standard test is that it cannot accommodate materials that are volatile under the test condition. At TCC-RMD some special equipment has been developed that allows tests to be made on confined samples at elevated temperature and pressure. 

Current tests are generally destructive (i.e., sample is altered or destroyed) and robust estimates of measurement system variability (all aspects of the procedure including the operators) are difficult to obtain without using methods such as Gauge R R-reproducibility and repeatability (14). Suitability of current methods then is based on calibration using a calibrator system that has its own built-in variability and other assumptions (e.g., in physical testing such characteristics as size, shape, density can alter aerodynamic and/or hydrodynamic behavior of materials in a test system and contribute to systems variability). 

Once a polymer is fuUy saturated, the physical tests described above can be conducted with confidence. Naturally, minimizing the evaporation of water should be considered. The one exception in this new category of testing is flow of water through the foam. This is not covered in the standard but will be very important for some applications, particularly in environmental remediation. If the intent is to build a biofilter or a continuous flow enzyme reactor, we must know the hydrodynamic properties of the materials we produce. Since polyurethanes are rarely used in these environments, the flow of water even through a reticulated foam is not described by the manufacturers. Furthermore, if we are to make composites of reticulated foams, the amount of polymer grafted to the surface will have a dominating effect on the flow of water. In a later chapter, we will describe our work in this area. 

The intermediate hopper acts as a storage balancing the inventory change. Evidently there is essentially no inlet and outlet effect, inasmuch as the voidage curves taper off into their respective asymptotic values for both the top and bottom sections of the fast column. This simple boundary condition facilitates flow modeling and the solution of the hydrodynamic equations. It should also be noted that the acceleration zone for the materials tested is too short to call for consideration. 

Experiments were performed to establish appropriate hydrodynamic behavior of the moving bed filter. Tests were performed with a plexiglass prototype using soda-lime glass beads as the granular material and air as the gas stream. All tests were conducted at room temperature (25 C) and atmospheric pressure. 

It is surprising that there are very limited data on the chemical resistance of various oxide materials. Most of the data are obtained on solid, non-porous materials and with simple dissolution test methods. In the few cases where porous materials are used, hydrodynamic conditions are not or are inadequately taken into account and flow of the aggressive media through the pore network does not occur during the tests. 

The potential for hydrodynamic artefacts (e.g., floating, clogging of material to screens, adhesion to equipment of the formulation or variable flow conditions in the vicinity of the formulation due to other reasons) is strongly formulation dependent and thus has to be evaluated for each type of formulation. In order to detect artefacts, careful visual inspection of the dissolution test equipment is crucial. Video recordings can be used to aid such investigations. 

More focus on consistent variable testing is needed. Oftentimes, multiple variables are adjusted while the analysis is focused on just one. The conclusions are based on one variable, and the changes in the others are ignored. Particle size comparisons are often done based on scale. One group is often referred to as large with a diameter on the millimeter scale, while the small particles are defined by a diameter less than 1 mm. In addition, these particles are often constfucted of differing materials, such that a density variance is introduced, or are used in different concentrations. These facts make hydrodynamic and gas-Uquid mass transfer conclusions highly variable in the literature. 

A large obstacle to the rapid development of the blcxid-compatible polymers is the lack of an evaluation standard for blood compatibility. This lack of standard method is, to some extent, unavoidable stnce thrombus formation is a combination of such complex events that no single method can fiilly evaluate die compatibility of bio-materials. A variety of tests should be accomplished taking into account the hydrodynamics of blood, the physical and chemical structure of the interface between the blood and the biomaterial, the sort of test animals, etc. 

Hence the pure attrition tests are not sufficient when a quantitative prediction of the attrition-induced material loss or a prediction of the effect on the bed particle size distribution is required. This is for instance the case in the design procedure of a process, where the capacity of the dust collection system and the lifetime of the bed material must be evaluated (Vaux and Fellers, 1981 Zenz, 1974) and where—above all—the hydrodynamics and thus the bed particle size distribution must be clear (Ray et al., 1987a Zenz, 1971). Another example is when a new generation of catalyst is to be developed for an existing fluidized bed reactor here it might not be sufficient to know the relative hardness in comparison to the previous catalyst generation. For a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis, it is rather necessary to predict the attrition-induced loss rate and to be sure about the hydrodynamics and thus the particle population of the bed material. The same is valid when a fuel or a sorbent is to be changed in a combustion process. 

---