Hydrocarbon interface

In order to include other interactions such as dipolar or hydrogen bonding, many semiempirical approaches have been tried [196, 197, 200], including adding terms to Eq. X-45 [198, 201] or modifying the definition of [202, 199]. Perhaps the most well-known of these approaches comes from Fowkes [203, 204] suggestion that the interactions across a water-hydrocarbon interface are dominated by dispersion forces such that Eq. X-45 could be modified as... 

In the LPG contactor the amine is normally the continuous phase with the amine-hydrocarbon interface at the top of the contactor. This interface level controls the amine flow out of the contactor. (Some liquid/liquid contactors are operated with the hydrocarbon as the continuous phase. In this case, the interface is controlled at the bottom of the contactor.) The treated C3/C4 stream leaves the top of the contactor. A final coalescer is often installed to recover the carry-over amine. 

The popular applications of the adsorption potential measurements are those dealing with the surface potential changes at the water/air and water/hydrocarbon interface when a monolayer film is formed by an adsorbed substance. " " " Phospholipid monolayers, for instance, formed at such interfaces have been extensively used to study the surface properties of the monolayers. These are expected to represent, to some extent, the surface properties of bilayers and biological as well as various artificial membranes. An interest in a number of applications of ordered thin organic films (e.g., Langmuir and Blodgett layers) dominated research on the insoluble monolayer during the past decade. 

In the latter work it was suggested that the intercalation of SB 211475 into the glycerol phosphate hydrocarbon interface makes the membrane more resistant to lipid peroxidation.)... 

The two pumps within each recovery well are controlled by a series of electrodes that are positioned at predetermined levels within the well. The water pump utilizes a power interrupter probe to detect free hydrocarbon. This probe is positioned above the water intake and is adjusted to turn off the pump automatically when the hydrocarbon interface approaches the pump intake. This prevents the lower pump from accidentally pumping LNAPL to the injection wells. 

Kovaleski, J.M. and Wirth, M.J., Temperature dependence of the lateral diffusion of acridine orange at water/hydrocarbon interfaces, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 10304, 1996. 

The L-B films offer some advantages over aqueous-hydrocarbon interfaces of micelles and the related assemblies discussed above in terms of the magnitude of their orienting ability and the ease of interpretation of selectivity in photoreactions conducted in them. Molecules in the films have very little freedom of motion (stiff reaction cavities), their interfaces are very well defined, and therefore the alignment of reactant molecules can be readily expressed in the products. Photodimerization of stilbazole derivatives 62, N-octadecyl-l-(4-pyridyl)-4-(phenyl)-l,3-butadiene, (63), surfactant styrene derivatives 64 and 65, and cinnamic acids have been carried out in L-B films [18, 196-200], In all cases, single isomeric head-head dimers are obtained. Geometric isomerization of olefins has not been observed in competition with photodimerization. Independent of the location of the chromophore (i.e.,... 

This may be seen directly by comparing the right-hand side of Figure 11.4 with the left-hand side, which shows that the net process is the loss of one water-hydrocarbon interface. 

A number of other researchers have also confirmed that nucleation and subsequent growth typically occurs at the water-hydrocarbon interface for methane hydrate (Huo et al., 2001 0stergaard et al., 2001 Taylor, 2006) and carbon dioxide hydrate (Kimuro et al., 1993 Fujioka et al., 1994 Hirai et al., 1995 Mori, 1998). 

Molecular simulation methods have been applied to investigate the nucleation mechanism of gas hydrates in the bulk water phase (Baez and Clancy, 1994), and more recently at the water-hydrocarbon interface (Radhakrishnan and Trout, 2002 Moon et al., 2003). The recent simulations performed at the water-hydrocarbon interface provide support for a local structuring nucleation hypothesis, rather than the previously described labile cluster model. 

Hydrate film/shell growth at the water-hydrocarbon interface... 

Hydrate growth is typically initiated at the water-hydrocarbon interface (as discussed in Section 3.1.1.4). Measurements of the growth of a hydrate film (or shell) at the water-hydrocarbon interface provides insight into the growth mechanism(s), which can be incorporated into realistic hydrate growth models. 

Experimental Studies of Film/Shell Growth at the Water-Hydrocarbon Interface... 

Table 3.4 summarizes the different studies that have been performed to measure the growth and morphology of a hydrate film/shell at the water-hydrocarbon interface (where the hydrocarbon can be gas or liquid). 

Mixing is an important parameter that influences the emulsion of hydrocarbons into sulfuric acid. Because the reaction occurs at the acid/hydrocarbon interface, better emulsion means smaller droplets and therefore faster reaction. 

Adsorption can be measured by direct or indirect methods. Direct methods include surface microtome method [46], foam generation method [47] and radio-labelled surfactant adsorption method [48]. These direct methods have several disadvantages. Hence, the amount of surfactant adsorbed per unit area of interface (T) at surface saturation is mostly determined by indirect methods namely surface and interfacial tension measurements along with the application of Gibbs adsorption equations (see Section 2.2.3 and Figure 2.1). Surfactant structure, presence of electrolyte, nature of non-polar liquid and temperature significantly affect the T value. The T values and the area occupied per surfactant molecule at water-air and water-hydrocarbon interfaces for several anionic, cationic, non-ionic and amphoteric surfactants can be found in Chapter 2 of [2]. 

At an air-water interface, a monolayer forms with heads lying down and tails up (toward air), whereas at an air-hydrocarbon interface the monolayer lies with tails down. By closing on the tail side, the sheetlike structure can be dispersed in aqueous solutions as spherical, rodlike, or disklike micelles (Fig. 3). Closure on the head side forms the corresponding inverted micelles in oil. Oil added to a micellar solution is incorporated into the interior of the micelle to form a swollen micellar solution. Thus, surfactant acts to solubilize substantial amounts of oil into aqueous solution. Similarly, a swollen inverted micellar solution enables significant solubilization of water in oil. 

The hydrophobic effect does a minimum number of hydrocarbon chains must associate before the water-hydrocarbon interface is eliminated. This association process is a cooperative one, and the micelles therefore have a minimum size. 

The fact that hydride transfer shows a dependence on the methylcyclopentane concentration in the emulsion Is consistent with a reaction occurring at the acid-hydrocarbon interface. It would be inconsistent with reaction occurring only in the bulk acid phase since there the methylcyclopentane concentration Is constant. 

The fact that some Increased rates are observed suggests that we have Increased cationic reactivity by weakening the acid and destabilizing carbonlum Ion Intermediates. The lack of correlation with solubility of the hydride donor again Indicates that significant hydride transfer does not occur In the bulk acid phase. Rather, the data are more easily understood If the reaction occurs primarily at the acid-hydrocarbon Interface under well mixed conditions. 

The alkylation model developed In this work Is one in which the reaction Is viewed as occurring In the acid phase and at the acid-hydrocarbon Interface. The formation of Cg s and trimethyl-pentanes occurs preferentially at the Interface. Adding cationic surfactants reduces the stability of the carbonlum Ion... 

Intermediates and causes them to abstract hydride Ions more rapidly from Isobutane or any other potential donor. Increased hydride transfer converts more of the carbonlum Ions at the add Interface to saturates faster, yielding product while minimizing polymerization and side reactions. It Is also likely that the surfactants physically block alkyl Ions from one another in the surface film and thus Impede Ion + olefin polymerization. In such a film the carbonlum Ion concentration must also be lower than In the absence of surfactant and mass law effects will therefore also lead to less polymerization and cracking. The fact that steady state hydride transfer rates In H2SO are subject to control through the use of acid modifiers which act In the bulk acid and at the acid-hydrocarbon Interface Is the key to the control of sulfuric acid alkylation. 

The Isobutylene released would be either at the acid-hydrocarbon Interface or in the acid phase Itself. The exact location at which the Isobutylene is released would depend to a considerable extent on the location of the initial ion in the acid phase. Although no direct information is available, the acid-soluble hydrocarbon cations (14) appear to have surfactant-type characteristics and may be located primarily at the acid-hydrocarbon interface. 

Schmerling (9,10) had originally postulated that a hydride Ion transfer from Isobutane was both the most Important method of hydride transfer and also part of the chain set of reactions (see Reaction C of Table I and Reaction M-2 of Table IV). Other hydride transfer steps that have now been suggested Include transfer with the acid-soluble hydrocarbons (RH), see Reaction M-1 of Table IV (8,11), and with Isobutylene, see Reaction M-3 (8). Reaction M-3 Is however considered to be of minor Importance since only trace amounts of free Isobutylene are likely ever present at the acid-hydrocarbon Interface (the probable location of alkylation reactions) Isobutylene quickly protonates to form t-CaHg . Reaction M-1 Is considered to be more Important than Reaction H-2 especially when sulfuric acid Is used as the catalyst for the reasons listed as follows ... 

Transfer of two hydride ions and one proton would result in DMH. Since the methyl groups could migrate on the chain, DMH s other than 2,5-DMH could be produced. Some t-butyl cations dissociate into isobutylene and protons hence this method could occur during alkylation with olefins other than isobutylene. Reaction N is probably only of minor Importance in most cases, however, since only small concentrations of free isobutylene are thought to occur at the acid-hydrocarbon interface most isobutylene quickly protonates to form t-butyl cations. 

HE S). It Is thought however, that significant fractions of the he s result from acid phase reactions as cotnnared to reactions at or close to the acid-hydrocarbon interface where rost alkylation reactions occur this latter conclusion is based on the results for two-step alkylations (6). 

Interfadal tension, however, cannot serve as the only criterion of adsorption. Typical sui ctants with asymmetric molecules or ions consisting of a polar group and a sufficiently long hydrocarbon chain are always active at water-hydrocarbon interfaces. The greater the difference in polarity between bounda ry phases the steeper the orientation of surfactant molecule at the interface and the larger the reduction in free energy of the system due to adsorption. 

Since the cross-sectional area of an aliphatic chain oriented perpendicular to the interface is about 20 A2 and that of a benzene ring oriented in the same fashion is about 25 A2, it is apparent that the hydrophobic chains of surfactants adsorbed at the aqueous solution-air or aqueous solution hydrocarbon interfaces are generally not in the close-packed arrangement normal to the interface at saturation adsorption. On the other hand, since the cross-sectional area of a —CH2 group lying flat in the interface is about 7 A2, the chains in the usual ionic surfactant with a hydrophilic group at one end of the molecule are not lying flat in the interface either, but are somewhat tilted with respect to the interface. 

The data in Table 2-2 indicate the following relations between the structure of the surfactant and its effectiveness of adsorption at the aqueous solution-air and aqueous solution-hydrocarbon interfaces. 

---