Hydraulic fluid, defined

PCBs and PCTs are particularly troublesome liquids because of their toxicity and persistence in the environment. They are defined as polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated terphenyls, monomethyl-dibromo-diphenyl metliane, monomethyl-dichloro-diphenyl metliane or monomethyl-tetrachlorodiphenyl methane. With low electrical conductivity and heat resistance they found wide use as dielectric fluids and were formerly used as hydraulic fluids. PCBs have not been made in the UK since 1977 and whilst most new uses for the substance are banned in most countries, around two-thirds of the 1.5 million tonnes manufactured in Europe and the US prior to 1985 still remain in equipment such as transformers. PCTs have been used in the past in a restricted range of specialist industrial applications. 

Mineral Oil Hydraulic Fluids and Polyalphaolefin Hydraulic Fluids. Very little public information is collected on the production volume and methods, import/export, applications, and disposal practices for the different types of mineral oil and polyalphaolefin hydraulic fluids. This is largely because public data series will generally not distinguish between hydraulic fluids and lubricants. Because of the extremely large number of workers and people in the general population exposed to these hydraulic fluids, development of more carefully defined data would allow a more accurate estimate of the numbers of people exposed and would allow development of likely routes of exposure and environmental loss. 

This profile covers total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), which is defined as the measurable amount of petroleum-based hydrocarbon in an environmental medium (Chapter 2). TPH is measured as the total quantity of hydrocarbons without identification of individual constituents. Sources of TPH contamination in the environment range from crude oil, to fuels such as gasoline and kerosene, to solvents, to mineral-based crankcase oil and mineral-based hydraulic fluids. These products contain not only a large number and variety of petroleum hydrocarbons, but also other chemicals that, strictly speaking, are not the subject of this profile, such as non-hydrocarbon additives and contaminants. The TPH issue is further complicated by the number of petroleum-derived hydrocarbons that have been identified—more than 250—and the variability in composition of crude oils and petroleum products (see Section 3.2 and Appendices D and E for details). 

JP-8 and hydraulic fluid sprays flames. The ranking is given in terms of a flame suppression number (on a mass basis), which is defined as the mass of agent relative to the mass of Halon 1301 needed to suppress an equivalent flame. Note that sodium bicarbonate powder (NaHCOs) was as effective a suppressant as Halon 1301 (to be discussed further in the section Powders ). 

Note that the Reynolds numbers for the two fluids are based on the equivalent hydraulic diameters, defined according to the relative velocity of the phases (Brauner and Moalem Maron [20]) ... 

Obtaining a given molecular organization of these structures as regards then-type, size, and arrangement is directly controlled by the thermodynamic conditions, i.e., p, T, and the nature of the hydraulic fluid used to pressurize. To this end, the isotropic transition of the diblock copolymer at which well-defined self-organized nanoscale structures form is the main thermodynamic property to document. 

Janoff, Vicic, and Cain [11] used accelerated life test methods to select the best material to use for lip seals used in water/glycol fluids contained in subsea oil-field hydraulic systems. The required seal life was 20 years at 93°C sustained temperature at 20.7 MPa pressure with 100 mechanical operations. Finite Element Analysis was used to determine the actual seal temperature in the installed component to establish the service temperature rating. Polyurethane and thermoplastic alloy seals were tested in water/glycol and hydrocarbon hydraulic fluids at 3—5 elevated temperatures at 20.7 MPa constant pressure. Failure was defined as seal leakage at pressure. Test results were analyzed using Least Squares regression in an equation like that used by KenneUey et al. The correlation coefficients exceeded 0.95 and show excellent fit to the model. Table 16B.1 shows the results of the study. 

The hydraulic design is described by two components the type of fluid outlet and the flow distribution. A 3 x 3 matrix of orifice types and flow distributions defines 9 numeric hydraulic design codes. The orifice type varies from changeable jets to fixed ports to open throat from left to right in the matrix. The flow distribution varies from bladed to ribbed to open face from top to bottom. There is usually a close correlation between the flow distribution and the cutter arrangement. 

A valve is defined as any device by which the flow of fluid may be started, stopped, regulated or directed by a movable part that opens or obstmcts passage of the fluid. Valves must be able to accurately control fluid flow, system pressure and to sequence the operation of all actuators within a hydraulic system. 

In this table the parameters are defined as follows Bo is the boiling number, d i is the hydraulic diameter, / is the friction factor, h is the local heat transfer coefficient, k is the thermal conductivity, Nu is the Nusselt number, Pr is the Prandtl number, q is the heat flux, v is the specific volume, X is the Martinelli parameter, Xvt is the Martinelli parameter for laminar liquid-turbulent vapor flow, Xw is the Martinelli parameter for laminar liquid-laminar vapor flow, Xq is thermodynamic equilibrium quality, z is the streamwise coordinate, fi is the viscosity, p is the density, <7 is the surface tension the subscripts are L for saturated fluid, LG for property difference between saturated vapor and saturated liquid, G for saturated vapor, sp for singlephase, and tp for two-phase. 

As will be outlined below, the computation of compressible flow is significantly more challenging than the corresponding problem for incompressible flow. In order to reduce the computational effort, within a CED model a fluid medium should be treated as incompressible whenever possible. A rule of thumb often found in the literature and used as a criterion for the incompressibility assumption to be valid is based on the Mach number of the flow. The Mach number is defined as the ratio of the local flow velocity and the speed of sound. The rule states that if the Mach number is below 0.3 in the whole flow domain, the flow may be treated as incompressible [84], In practice, this rule has to be supplemented by a few additional criteria [3], Especially for micro flows it is important to consider also the total pressure drop as a criterion for incompressibility. In a long micro channel the Mach number may be well below 0.3, but owing to the small hydraulic diameter of the channel a large pressure drop may be obtained. A pressure drop of a few atmospheres for a gas flow clearly indicates that compressibility effects should be taken into account. 

Once the hydrocarbons have been solubilized in the formation water, they move with the water under the influence of elevation and pressure (fluid), thermal, electroosmotic and chemicoosmotic potentials. Of these, the fluid potential is the most important and the best known. The fluid potential is defined as the amount of work required to transport a unit mass of fluid from an arbitrary chosen datum (usually sea level) and state to the position and state of the point considered. The classic work of Hubbert (192) on the theory of groundwater motion was the first published account of the basinwide flow of fluids that considered the problem in exact mathematical terms as a steady-state phenomenon. His concept of formation fluid flow is shown in Figure 3A. However, incongruities in the relation between total hydraulic head and depth below surface in topographic low areas suggested that Hubbert s model was incomplete (193). Expanding on the work of Hubbert, Toth (194, 195) introduced a mathematical mfcdel in which exact flow patterns are... 

Hydraulic conductivity, K, is a measure of the fluid permeability of tissues. It is defined in Darcy s Law as a ratio of flow rate to pressure gradient. The value of K depends upon the viscosity of the fluid and structures of tissues. During intratumoral infusion, the viscosity can be experimentally controlled, but tissue structures may change with time and infusion conditions, presumably due to tissue deformation (Barry and Aldis, 1992 Dillehay, 1997 Lai and Mow, 1980 Zakaria et al., 1997 Zhang et al., 2000). 

The interstitial fluid content of the skin is higher than in the subcutaneous fat layer and normal fluid movement is intrinsically finked to lymphatic drainage as governed by mechanical stresses of the tissue. A model of temporal profiles of pressure, stress, and convective ISF velocity has been developed based on hydraulic conductivity, overall fluid drainage (lymphatic function and capillary absorption), and elasticity of the tissue.34 Measurements on excised tissue and in vivo measurement on the one-dimensional rat tail have defined bulk average values for key parameters of the model and the hydration dependence of the hydraulic flow conductivity. Numerous in vivo characterization studies with nanoparticles and vaccines are currently underway, so a more detailed understanding of the interstitial/lymphatic system will likely be forthcoming. 

If the channel through which the fluid flows is not of circular cross section, it is recommended that the heat-transfer correlations be based on the hydraulic diameter DH, defined by... 

To calculate the reduction in the concentration of surfactant in the fluid by adsorption it is necessary to have an estimation of the inner surface area of the reservoir. This parameter is related to the porosity of the medium and to its permeability. Attempts have been made to correlate these two quantities but the results have been unsuccessful, because there are parameters characteristic of each particular porous medium involved in the description of the problem (14). For our analysis we adopted the approach of Kozeny and Carman (15). These authors defined a parameter called the "equivalent hydraulic radius of the porous medium" which represents the surface area exposed to the fluid per unit volume of rock. They obtained the following relationship between the permeability, k, and the porosity, 0 ... 

---