Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Structure hydrate

There are two hydrate structures, types 1 et 11, each composed of two cavity sizes. Only the lightest of the hydrocarbons can form hydrates. Table 4.20 gives the hydrates formed by the most common compounds. [Pg.173]

The UV spectra have been used in studies of protonation and related covalent hydration, structural assignments and tautomerism (see appropriate Sections), as well as in studies of bridgehead addition to 5-deazapterins (79MI21500, 78TL2271) and related 5-deazaflavin derivatives (80JA1092). [Pg.204]

Bella, J., Brodsky, B., Berman, H.M. Hydration structure of a collagen peptide. Structure 3 893-906, 1995. [Pg.298]

P3Timidines, and pyrido[4,3-< ]pyrimidines. The experimentally determined values have been used for studies of covalent hydration, structural assignments, - and tautomerism. -... [Pg.184]

Chemical Name Tetrakis(hydroxymagnesium)decahydroxydialuminate dihydrate Common Name Magnesium aluminate hydrate monalium hydrate Structural Formula [Mg(DH)]4 [(HD)4AI(DH)(HO)AI(OH)4]-2H2D Chemical Abstracts Registry No. 1317-26-6... [Pg.893]

Clearly compound 26 (R = Ac) had undergone a reaction analogous to the glycal rearrangement. It has been demonstrated that the rearrangement of this compound also occurs at room temperature in acetic anyhydride in the presence of zinc chloride (34). Under these conditions, however, a further slower isomerization takes place and a third product, assigned the acetylated enone-hydrate structure 29, was isolated. As noted later this structure has been shown to be incorrect. [Pg.160]

Chirality center, 292 detection of, 292-293 Eischer projections and, 975-978 R,S configuration of, 297-300 Chitin, structure of, 1002 Chloral hydrate, structure of, 707 Chloramphenicol, structure of, 304 Chlorine, reaction with alkanes, 91-92,335-338 reaction with alkenes, 215-218 reaction with alkynes, 262-263 reaction with aromatic compounds, 550 Chloro group, directing effect of, 567-568... [Pg.1291]

TABLE VI. Composition of the Mixed Hydrate (Structure II) of Methane and Propane, when in Equilibrium with Ice and Gas at —3°C as a Function of Pressure... [Pg.46]

A good understanding of the properties of water is thus essential as we move to more complicated systems. We have been involving in the study of aqueous solution of many important biological molecules, such as acetylcholine, Gramicidin, deoxydinucleoside phosphate and proflavin, and DNA, etc., first at the Monte Carlo level and slowly moving to the molecular dynamics simulations. We will discuss some of the new results on the hydration structure and the dynamics of B- and Z-DNA in the presence of counterions in the following. [Pg.251]

An analysis of the hydration structure of water molecules in the major and minor grooves in B-DNA has shown that there is a filament of water molecules connecting both the inter and the intra phosphate groups of the two strands of B-DNA. However, such a connectivity is absent in the case of Z-DNA confirming earlier MC simulation results. The probability density distributions of the counterions around DNA shows deep penetration of the counterions in Z-DNA compared to B-DNA. Further, these distributions suggest very limited mobility for the counterions and show well defined counter-ion pattern as originally suggested in the MC study. [Pg.253]

The present example does support some speculation on an outstanding puzzle for our conceptualization of hydrophobic effects. It is known that the sum of the standard hydration entropies of K+(aq) and Cl (aq) is about twice the standard hydration entropy of Ar(aq) [67]. The case of methanol as the solvent is qualitatively different. If hydrophobic effects are conceptualized on the basis of hydration entropies and specific hydration structures then this is paradoxical according to the measured entropies K+(aq) + Cl (aq) is about as hydrophobic as Ar(aq) + Ar(aq), but the hydration structures neighboring K+(aq), Cl (aq), and Ar(aq) should be qualitatively different. This paradox has not been given a satisfactory explanation. [Pg.346]

Asthagiri, D. Pratt, L. R. Paulaitis, M. E. Rempe, S. B., Hydration structure and free energy of biomolecularly specific aqueous dications, including Zn2+ and first transition row metals, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,126, 1285-1289... [Pg.348]

Grossman, J. C. Schwegler, E. Galli, G., Quantum and classical molecular dynamics simulations of hydrophobic hydration structure around small solutes, J. Phys. Chem. B 2004,108, 15865-15872... [Pg.350]

The formation of niclosamide hydrates, and the effect of relative humidity on the solvatomorphs obtained from acetone and ethyl acetate has been studied [79], The acetone and ethyl acetate solvatomorphs could be desolvated, and exposure to elevated humidity resulted in the formation of two hydrate structures. Each hydrate could be dehydrated into a different anhydrate phase, but only the hydrate formed from the acetone desolvate could be rehydrated to form a hydrate phase. Dynamic vapor sorption has been used to develop a method for determining the onset relative humidity of a glass transition and associated crystallization process [80]. [Pg.273]

In filtration, the particle-collector interaction is taken as the sum of the London-van der Waals and double layer interactions, i.e. the Deijagin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory. In most cases, the London-van der Waals force is attractive. The double layer interaction, on the other hand, may be repulsive or attractive depending on whether the surface of the particle and the collector bear like or opposite charges. The range and distance dependence is also different. The DLVO theory was later extended with contributions from the Born repulsion, hydration (structural) forces, hydrophobic interactions and steric hindrance originating from adsorbed macromolecules or polymers. Because no analytical solutions exist for the full convective diffusion equation, a number of approximations were devised (e.g., Smoluchowski-Levich approximation, and the surface force boundary layer approximation) to solve the equations in an approximate way, using analytical methods. [Pg.209]

The employment of NMR-active isotopes permits to access experimental parameters which are intrinsically difficult to measure, unless a significant concentration of the sugar is present in the NMR tube. For instance, aqueous solutions of N-acetyIncuraminic acid, labeled with 13C at Cl, C2, and/or C3, were analyzed to detect and quantify the various chemical species present in equilibrium at different pHs. In fact, in addition to the expected a and (3 pyranose forms, acyclic keto, keto hydrate and enol forms were identified on the basis of 13C NMR spectroscopic data. Besides, DFT methods were employed to predict the effect of enol and hydrate structure on the coupling constant values Jc,u and /c c involving C2 and C3, finding that 2/c2,h3 can be safely used to differentiate the cis and tram isomers of the enol forms.9... [Pg.334]

Water on Vermiculite. For low water contents (that is, one or two water layers), the evidence for highly structured water in the interlayer spaces of smectites and vermiculites is most easily seen in X-ray diffraction structure determinations of ordered hydrate structures such as the two-water layer hydrate of Ca-vermiculite (14. 15) and Na-vermiculite (15., 16). [Pg.41]

Obviously this picture might be supported and supplemented by according data from different experimental investigations, or it might be modified to fit these data. Interactions within the basic hydrated structures, as well as their energetics, are obtainable from gas-phase solvation experiments or from accurate MO calculations. For the simulation of real solutions, dynamic calculations will be inevitable. There is, however, a demand for acceptable effective potentials to be used in molecular dynamics, or in Monte Carlo calculations. [Pg.50]

The electron level in hydrated redox particles consists of the energy AGmt (< 0) required for the standard gaseous electron to combine with or to be released from the gaseous redox partides and the energy AG ,(>0) required for the redox particles to form their hydrate structures. Since the donor and acceptor levels of gaseous redox particles Pefi j/Fe, equal each other, the difference between the... [Pg.48]

Fig. 2-36. Electron energy levels in hydrated oxidant Fe and reduc-tantFe AG = energy to organize hydrate structures dGj t = energy required for dehydrated redox ions to donate or accept gaseous electrons ep.2> o = most probable electron donor level of Fe Spe +.A = most probable electron acceptor level of Fe Hj05,2.,p,j = hydrated structures cgn) = standard gaseous electron level (s 0). Fig. 2-36. Electron energy levels in hydrated oxidant Fe and reduc-tantFe AG = energy to organize hydrate structures dGj t = energy required for dehydrated redox ions to donate or accept gaseous electrons ep.2> o = most probable electron donor level of Fe Spe +.A = most probable electron acceptor level of Fe Hj05,2.,p,j = hydrated structures cgn) = standard gaseous electron level (s 0).
The reorganization of the hydrate structure occurs immediately after the electron transfer. Since the rate of electron transfer (about 10 seconds) is much faster than the rate of molecnilar vibration (about 10 seconds), the electron transfer occurs adiabatically while the hydrate structure is frozen. This is the... [Pg.49]

Pig. 2-37. Redox reaction cycle FeJ5 - Fejj + ei iD, - FeJ in aqueous solution solid arrow=adiabatic electron transfer, dotted arrow = hydrate structure reorganization X = reorganization energy ered.d = most probable donor level eox.a = most probable acceptor level. [Pg.50]

The localized electron level of hydrated particles in aqueous solutions, different from that of particles in solids, does not remain constant but it fluctuates in the range of reorganization energy, X, because of the thermal (rotational and vibrational) motion of coordinated water molecules in the hydration structure. The electron levels cox,a and esmo are the most probable levels of oxidants and reductants, respectively. [Pg.51]

Fig. 2-39. Gaussian normal distri bution of the probabili density of redox electron levels due to thermal fluctuation of hydrate structures epd)Bx>X) = standard Fermi level of redox electrons. Fig. 2-39. Gaussian normal distri bution of the probabili density of redox electron levels due to thermal fluctuation of hydrate structures epd)Bx>X) = standard Fermi level of redox electrons.
Cui et al. performed similar analyses to fhose of Dupuis and co-workers. The side chain-side chain radial disfribufion functions (RDFs) reported by Cui et al. show remarkable qualitative deviation from fhose in Zhou et al. i It is of note that the united atom approach used by Cui and co-workers ignored electrostatic interactions between CP2 groups of the polymeric backbone. This can lead to a poor description of fhe hydrated structure in the regions close to the polymeric backbones, unlike the all-atom force field used in Zhou et al. ° For the sake of limited computational resources, Cui et al. used a relatively short representation of Nation ionomer chains consisting of three monomers as compared to the ten monomers used by Vishnyakov and Neimark or Urata et al. It can be expected that structural correlations will strongly depend on this choice. [Pg.361]

Figure 11. Stylized view of Kreuer of the nanoscopic hydrated structures of Nafion and sulfonated polyetherketone. (Reprinted with permission from ref 91. Copyright 2003 Elsevier.)... Figure 11. Stylized view of Kreuer of the nanoscopic hydrated structures of Nafion and sulfonated polyetherketone. (Reprinted with permission from ref 91. Copyright 2003 Elsevier.)...
The Na NMR parameters of Nafion are not greatly affected by changing EW in the range of water content where valid comparisons are possible. " and this reflects the short-ranged nature of these dynamic ionic—hydrate structures. [Pg.323]


See other pages where Structure hydrate is mentioned: [Pg.568]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.1150]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.323]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.251 , Pg.520 ]




SEARCH



Applications of QMCF hydration structure parameters

Cambridge Structural Database hydrate structures

Cations hydrate structures around

Chloral hydrate, structure

Clathrate hydrates crystal structures

Clathrate hydrates host water, structure

Clathrate hydrates structure

Clathrate hydration molecular structure

Clathrate-hydrate cage structures

Crystal structure gas clathrate hydrates

Crystal structures of gas hydrates

Energetic materials, structure hydrate

Guanosine hydrate, crystal structure

Hydrate Crystalline Cavities and Structures

Hydrate Layer Structures

Hydrate crystal cells—structures I, II, and

Hydrated proton structures

Hydrated protons structural models

Hydrates crystal structure

Hydrates structural formulas

Hydration antiprismatic structure

Hydration of Carbonyl Structures

Hydration shell, Structure

Hydration structure

Hydration tricapped trigonal prismatic structure

Hydration, ionic, structural entropy

Polysaccharides, crystal structure hydration

Protein hydration layer molecular structure

Structural isomerism hydration isomers

Structure of gas hydrates

Structure sulphate hydrates

Structures of crystalline hydrates

Summary Statements for Hydrate Structure

The structure of hydrated metal oxide surfaces from X-ray diffraction studies

Weaker hydration structure

© 2024 chempedia.info