Hydration entropies

Prediction of solubility for simple ionic compounds is difficult since we need to know not only values of hydration and lattice enthalpies but also entropy changes on solution before any informed prediction can be given. Even then kinetic factors must be considered. 

In this discussion, entropy factors have been ignored and in certain cases where the difference between lattice energy and hydration energy is small it is the entropy changes which determine whether a substance will or will not dissolve. Each case must be considered individually and the relevant data obtained (see Chapter 3), when irregular behaviour will often be found to have a logical explanation. 

As is suggested frequently , this term might well result from the restriction of the hydrogen bonding possibilities experienced by the water molecules in the first hydration shell. For each individual water molecule this is probably a relatively small effect, but due to the small size of the water molecules, a large number of them are entangled in the first hydration shell, so that the overall effect is appreciable. This theory is in perfect agreement with the observation that the entropy of hydration of a nonpolar molecule depends linearly on the number of water molecules in the first hydration shell ". ... 

The theory predicts high stabilities for hard acid - hard base complexes, mainly resulting from electrostatic interactions and for soft acid - soft base complexes, where covalent bonding is also important Hard acid - soft base and hard base - soft acid complexes usually have low stability. Unfortunately, in a quantitative sense, the predictive value of the HSAB theory is limited. Thermodynamic analysis clearly shows a difference between hard-hard interactions and soft-soft interactions. In water hard-hard interactions are usually endothermic and occur only as a result of a gain in entropy, originating from a liberation of water molecules from the hydration shells of the... 

If one would ask a chemist not burdened with any knowledge about the peculiar thermodynamics that characterise hydrophobic hydration, what would happen upon transfer of a nonpolar molecule from the gas phase to water, he or she would probably predict that this process is entropy driven and enthalpically highly unfavourable. This opinion, he or she wo ild support with the suggestion that in order to create room for the nonpolar solute in the aqueous solution, hydrogen bonds between water molecules would have to be sacrificed. 

Privalov, P. L., and Makhatadze, G. I., 1993. Contributions of hydration to protein folding thermodynamics. II. The entropy and Gibbs energy of hydration. y(9wra z/ of Molecular Biology 232 660-679. 

AH and AS to various notional subprocesses such as bond dissociation energies, ionization energies, electron affinities, heats and entropies of hydration, etc., which themselves have empirically observed values that are difficult to compute ab initio. 

The fact that both heats of formation and equilibrium pressures of the hydrates of spherical molecules correctly follow from one model must mean that the L-J-D theory gives a good account of the entropy associated with the motions of these solutes in the cavities of a clathrate. That the heat of formation of ethane hydrate is predicted correctly, whereas the theoretical value of its vapor pressure is too low, is a further indication that the latter discrepancy must be ascribed to hindered rotation of the ethane molecules in their cavities. 

K. S. Pitzer and L. V. Coulter. "The Heat Capacities. Entropies and Heats of Solution of Anhydrous Sodium Sulfate and of Sodium Sulfate Decahydrate. The Application of the Third Law of Thermodynamics to Hydrated Crystals". J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 60. 1310-1313 (1938). 

G. Brodale and W. F. Giauque, "The Heat of Hydration of Sodium Sulfate. Low Temperature Heat Capacity and Entropy of Sodium Sulfate Decahydrate", J. Am. Chem. Soc., 80, 2042-2044 (1958). 

The difference in these patterns probably reflects that the hydrate entropies are related simply to the net positive charge on the cationic species (i.e., +2 for Pu022) while the hydrolysis reaction is the result of interaction of a water molecule with the metal atom itself — i.e., Pu in Pu022. If this is a valid explanation, the hydrolysis order indicates that the charge on Pu in Pu022 is actually between +3 and +4 and probably about +3.3. 

C and 2.4 — 5.3 for Ae hydration of arylpropiolic acids at 25°C in 50% sulfuric acid. The rates of both reactions give a linear correlation when plotted against Ho, with a slope of near unity and both reactions have comparable high negative entropies of activation. 

---