Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

HPLC method development mobile phase selection

To apply a screening approach to proactive method development, analyses of selectivity samples under a variety of mobile phase conditions are conducted on different HPLC columns. HPLC columns should be as orthogonaT as possible and variations in solvent composition should be designed to maximize the probability of selectivity differences. Alternate separation techniques, such as ion exchange chromatography (IC), supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), or capillary electrophoresis (CE) may also be used to obtain orthogonality. [Pg.153]

A typical example of HPLC method development and validation was provided by Boneschans et al. [9]. They developed an HPLC method for piroxicam benzoate and its major hydrolytic degradation products, piroxicam and benzoic acid. The authors utilised a robust stationary phase (Phenomenex Luna, Cig), with an optimised mobile phase comprising of acetonitrile/water/acetic acid (45/7/8 v/v), and a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. The operating pH of the mobile phase (pH 2.45) was selected on the basis that it is ca. 2 pH units from the pKa of the drug, and hence reasonably insensitive to changes in mobile-phase preparation. The injection volume was 20 pi with a detection wavelength of 254 nm. They utihsed... [Pg.22]

A well-defined method development plan with clear aim of analysis is critical to the success for fast and effective method development. The general approach for the method development for the separation of pharmaceutical compounds was discussed, emphasizing that modifications in the mobile phase (organic and pH) play a dramatic role on the separation selectivity. The knowledge of the Ka of the primary compound is of utmost importance prior to the commencement of HPLC method development. Moreover, pH screening experiments can help to discern the ionizable nature of the other impurities (i.e., synthetic by-products, metabolites, degradation products, etc.) in the mixture. [Pg.451]

This chapter provides an overview of modern HPLC method development and discusses approaches for initial method development (column, detector, and mobile phase selection), method optimization to improve resolution, and emerging method development trends. The focus is on reversed-phase methods for quantitative analysis of small organic molecules since RPLC accounts for 60-80% of these applications. Several case studies on pharmaceutical impurity testing are presented to illustrate the method development process. For a detailed treatment of this subject and examples of other sample types, the reader is referred to the classic book on general HPLC method development by L. Snyder et al.1 and book chapters2,3 on pharmaceutical method development by H. Rasmussen et al. Other resources include computer-based training4 and training courses.5... [Pg.194]

The major contrast with GC is that the mobile phase eluent strength (affecting k ) and the relative selectivity between analytes (a) can both be readUy varied. In GC the carrier gas composition has practically no effect on selectivity, and varying temperature affects only k. The large number and range of parameters to be evaluated to optimize the eluent composition makes HPLC method development more complex. Every benefit comes with its own price ... [Pg.805]

For more information on selecting stationary and mobile phases, see L. R. Snyder. J. J. Kirkland, and J. L Giaich. Practical HPLC Method Development, 2nd ed-. New York Wiley, 1997. [Pg.950]

In the development of a SE-HPLC method the variables that may be manipulated and optimized are the column (matrix type, particle and pore size, and physical dimension), buffer system (type and ionic strength), pH, and solubility additives (e.g., organic solvents, detergents). Once a column and mobile phase system have been selected the system parameters of protein load (amount of material and volume) and flow rate should also be optimized. A beneficial approach to the development of a SE-HPLC method is to optimize the multiple variables by the use of statistical experimental design. Also, information about the physical and chemical properties such as pH or ionic strength, solubility, and especially conditions that promote aggregation can be applied to the development of a SE-HPLC assay. Typical problems encountered during the development of a SE-HPLC assay are protein insolubility and column stationary phase... [Pg.534]

Procedures used vary from trial-and-error methods to more sophisticated approaches including the window diagram, the simplex method, the PRISMA method, chemometric method, or computer-assisted methods. Many of these procedures were originally developed for HPLC and were apphed to TLC with appropriate changes in methodology. In the majority of the procedures, a set of solvents is selected as components of the mobile phase and one of the mentioned procedures is then used to optimize their relative proportions. Chemometric methods make possible to choose the minimum number of chromatographic systems needed to perform the best separation. [Pg.95]

The PRISMA model was developed by Nyiredy for solvent optimization in TLC and HPLC [142,168-171]. The PRISMA model consists of three parts the selection of the chromatographic system, optimization of the selected mobile phases, and the selection of the development method. Since silica is the most widely used stationary phase in TLC, the optimization procedure always starts with this phase, although the method is equally applicable to all chemically bonded phases in the normal or reversed-phase mode. For the selection of suitable solvents the first experiments are carried out on TLC plates in unsaturated... [Pg.866]

The silanol induced peak tailing is also a function of the pH of the mobile phase. It is much less pronounced at acidic pH than at neutral pH. Therefore many of the older HPLC methods use acidified mobile phases. However, pH is an important and very valuable tool in methods development. The selectivity of a separation of ionizable compounds is best adjusted by a manipulation of the pH value. The retention factor of the non-ionized form of an analyte is often by a factor of 30 larger than the one of the ionized form, and it can be adjusted to any value in between by careful control of the mobile phase pH. This control must include a good buffering capacity of the buffer to avoid random fluctuations of retention times. [Pg.102]


See other pages where HPLC method development mobile phase selection is mentioned: [Pg.1439]    [Pg.1299]    [Pg.1367]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.1438]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.929]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.1366]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.1161]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.529]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.200 , Pg.201 , Pg.202 , Pg.203 ]




SEARCH



Developer selectivity

Development phases

HPLC methods

HPLC methods development

Method development

Method phase

Method selection

Method selectivity

Mobile phase selection

Mobile phase selectivity

Mobile selection

Mobility methods

Mobility selectivity

Phase selection

Phase selectivity

SELECT method

Selective development

Selective methods

Selectivity HPLC development

Selectivity development

Selectivity method development

© 2024 chempedia.info