Heavy metals specific substances

All purity specifications normally list identity tests, an assay, further criteria like loss on drying, general maximum levels for heavy metals and substance-specific limits of byproducts. 

Light stabilizers are divided into three categories UV absorbers, free radical terminators, and quenchers (2). The UV absorbers will absorb the UV radiation to prevent the formation of free radicals. Hindered-amine light stabilizers (HALS) terminate the free radicals. They are more expensive than UV absorbers. The third category of light stabilizers are quenchers that are often represented by nickel complexes. Because of toxicity of heavy metals and substances of concern (SOCs) specification from OEMs and government regulations, quenchers are not as widely used. 

Because they are weak acids or bases, the iadicators may affect the pH of the sample, especially ia the case of a poorly buffered solution. Variations in the ionic strength or solvent composition, or both, also can produce large uncertainties in pH measurements, presumably caused by changes in the equihbria of the indicator species. Specific chemical reactions also may occur between solutes in the sample and the indicator species to produce appreciable pH errors. Examples of such interferences include binding of the indicator forms by proteins and colloidal substances and direct reaction with sample components, eg, oxidising agents and heavy-metal ions. 

Pollution of soils and waters by human activities is an important and widespread problem. This pollution by, organic and inorganic substances can affect individual organisms, human populations, and ecosystems, each in its own unique way. In particular former military installations, often used for weapons production and nuclear power plants represent a ongoing and substantial threat to environment and human health because of the specific pollutants that can be released Solvents, explosives, fuels, radionuclides, heavy metals, and metalloids all have been identified in the environment around these installations. Remediation technologies for these contaminated sites have been developed based on conventional systems utilising physical and chemical treatments, such as excavation and incineration, pump-and-treat methods, ultraviolet oxidation, soil washing, etc. 

The drug substance in qnestion was known to degrade via an oxidative pathway that in solntion is enhanced by low pH and levels of heavy metals in the presence of oxygen. Two specific impurities 3,5-dihydroxybenzaldhyde and l-tert-bntyl 4,6,8-trihydroxytetrahydroiso-quinoline were known to increase nnder these conditions (Figure 5) and these were the same two that cansed the validation to fail. 

In conclusion, the authors of the cited studies all agree that further research into environmental risk assessment of hospital effluents, incorporating different types of substances used in care and diagnostic activities, as well as cleaning operations (pharmaceuticals, detergents, disinfectants, heavy metals, macropollutants), is vital. Moreover, further studies need to be focussed on evaluating the risk posed by pollutant mixtures, and work is needed to validate the predictive models proposed thus far [19, 49], to evaluate chronic toxicity due to PhCs and then-mixtures and to provide experimental data pertaining to specific case studies. 

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and radioactive substances, predominantly emitted by industrial sources, are not specific to any type of farming activity. As with heavy metals, similar levels of contamination are to be expected in organic and conventional food sources. 

Specific considerations of metabolism and accumulation are not necessary in the application of a TTC provided that the substances are not likely to show very large species differences in accumulations such as, e.g., polyhalogenated-dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls and related compounds, as well as nonessential heavy metals in elemental, ionic or organic forms. Such substances are known to accumulate in the body, and the traditionally employed safety factors (Section 5.2.1) may not be high enough to account for species differences in rates of elimination of such chemicals. Therefore, the TTC approach should not be used for such substances. 

In JP monographs, the specification value and testing procedure are described as a comparative limit test for the quantity of heavy metals that exist in drug substances as inorganic impurities. The permissible limit on the ppm scale for heavy metals (as Pb) is prescribed as the specification value. From the development stage to the establishment of the limit test method for a monograph, the validation in place has to be done for both the quantitative method for actual measurement and the comparative limit method with the control solution. However, the quantitative procedure has not been stated in the section on the heavy metals limit test in the JP s General Tests and other Japanese official... 

In this chapter, validation studies for developing the quantitative and JP limit test methods for heavy metals described in Specifications and Testing Methods of the drug substance section are described. Procedures to evaluate validation characteristics concerning the validation items of each test method are described. Table 7.1 summarizes the validation characteristics required by JP for testing of impurities. 

The quantitation of heavy metals in a drug substance is a method to determine the quantity of lead by determining the intensity of coloring with sodium sulfide based on the absorbance at 400 nm by spectrophotometry. It is a prerequisite to set up the limit test according to the JP requirements. With regard to validation characteristics of the quantitation method, specificity is not required because of... 

Accuracy. In the quantitative method that is used to measure the heavy metal quantity in the drug substance, the accuracy is usually represented by the recovery rate obtained from a spiked recovery test where lead is added to the samples. Since the heavy metals limit test specified in monograph specifications is a test where the intensity of coloring of the samples with sodium sulfide is compared with that of the control solution, it is necessary to confirm that heavy metal components can be detected fully in the process of test solution preparation. The Heavy Metals Limit Test in JP specifies four preparation methods for the test solutions. An appropriate method will be selected and used for further testing. The test method that gives the best recovery rate is to be adopted. The procedure is as follows ... 

Many countries have also established specific regulations to protect children from exposure to certain environmental hazards, including toxic chemicals. Examples include banning of heavy metals in toys, strict limit setting for persistent toxic substances in baby foods, and the setting of environmental limit values derived on the basis of infants sensitivities (e.g. nitrates in drinking-water). In the United States, concerns about children s special vulnerabilities... 

Heavy Metals Limits (Policy) The Committee on Food Chemicals Codex notes the importance of providing limits for individual heavy metals as required by the source and composition of individual food additives. Thus, it has decided to remove from most monographs the general heavy metals (as lead) limits and tests and, based on the current level and availability of scientific information and on the policy stated below, to replace them with limits and tests for specific heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, and mercury as may be relevant to each substance. 

Revision Description revised Heavy Metals (as Pb) and Ultraviolet Absorbance specifications and determinations deleted Tridodecylamine specification revised Readily Carbonizable Substances test replaced Residue on Ignition test reworded. ... 

---