Hammett LFERs

We can gain some insight into the meaning of the Brfjnsted relationships by means of the following development. Let us write a Hammett LFER for the acid dissociation constants of a series of acid catalysts, namely, log (KJK ) = p ,uiiO- ... 

Various successful Hammett LFER correlations of rate and equilibrium constants0... 

Isokinetic relationship. Show and discuss whether the existence of an isokinetic relationship (Section 7.4) is a necessary condition for a Hammett LFER. 

On the other hand, reduction of (H20)5Cr(NC5H4X) by Ru(bpy)3 has an associated value for p of 1.1, the same as for the Co and Ru ammine complexes and therefore a similar mechanism. For other applications of Hammett LFER see Refs. 141-144. 

Substituent effects have been reported previously and work on this topic continues. The half wave potentials of a series of substituted benzyl chlorides and bromides gave excellent correlations with Hammett o- substituent constants48. The positive p values from these Hammett LFERs (p = 5.0 and 2.8, respectively for chlorides and bromides) suggest that the potential-determining electrochemical process involves the formation of radical anion intermediates. 

Hammett LFER. An LFER with broad implications was developed in the 1930s by Hammett (1937) to explain substituent effects on reactions of meta- or para-substituted benzene compounds. Hammett found that hydrolysis of substituted ethyl benzoates, ionization of substituted benzoic acids, and many related reactions are affected by nature and position of aromatic substituents, and that the effect could be predicted quantitatively. Using rate and equilibrium constants for ionization of benzoic acid as references, Hammett defined the LFER ... 

The Hammett LFER relates the dissodation constants of substituted benzoic acids to that of benzoic acid itself. Described in 1937, the original relationship was developed to explain the electronic effects of substituents on the strengths of m- and p-substituted benzoic acids. Then, the parameter cr was defined for m- and p-substituted acids as... 

A correlation approach based on the Hammett LFER, in which values of log( fN / fN ) were plotted against values for each of the XCsH4N-added nucleophiles and yielded linear relationships with p values of —1.0 for 4-nitro-2-methylpyridine Af-oxide and —2.6 for 4-methylpyridine A oxide. The significance of these reaction constants was discussed. 

Hammett [7] was the first to develop an approach that was later subsumed under Linear Free Energy Relationships (LFER). He showed that the addity constants of a... 

Linear Free Energy—Linear Solvation Energy Relationships. Linear free energy (LFER) and linear solvation energy (LSER) relationships are used to develop correlations between selected properties of similar compounds. These are fundamentally a collection of techniques whereby properties can be predicted from other properties for which linear dependency has been observed. Linear relationships include not only simple y = rax + b relationships, but also more compHcated expressions such as the Hammett equation (254) which correlates equiUbrium constants for ben2enes,... 

The classic example, and still the most useful one, of a LFER is the Hammett equation, which correlates rates and equilibria of many side-chain reactions of meta- and para-substituted aromatic compounds. The standard reaction is the aqueous ionization equilibrium at 25°C of meta- and para-substituted benzoic acids. 

The Hammett equation and LFER in general added no new concepts to the qualitative picture that had been built up of electronic effects in organic reactions, but they did provide a quantitative measure that had been lacking and that has been found very useful. Here we will describe the further development of ideas concerning the substituent constant. 

Taft began the LFER attack on steric effects as part of his separation of electronic and steric effects in aliphatic compounds, which is discussed in Section 7.3. For our present purposes we abstract from that treatment the portion relevant to aromatic substrates. Hammett p values for alkaline ester hydrolysis are in the range +2.2 to +2.8, whereas for acid ester hydrolysis p is close to zero (see Table 7-2). Taft, therefore, concluded that electronic effects of substituents are much greater in the alkaline than in the acid series and. in fact, that they are negligible in the acid series. This left the steric effect alone controlling relative reactivity in the acid series. A steric substituent constant was defined [by analogy with the definition of cr in Eq. (7-22)] by Eq. (7-43), where k is the rate constant for acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of an orr/to-substituted benzoate ester and k is the corresponding rate constant for the on/to-methyl ester note that CH3, not H, is the reference substituent. ... 

Table 7-8 lists these ortho E% constants. An LFER can now be written by analogy with the Hammett equation. 

Instead of the definition in Eq. (7-82), the selectivity is often written as log k,). Another way to consider a selectivity-reactivity relationship is to compare the relative effects of a series of substituents on a pair of reactions. This is what is done when Hammett plots are made for a pair of reactions and their p values are compared. The slope of an LEER is a function of the sensitivity of the process being correlated to structural or solvent changes. Thus, in a family of closely related LFERs, the one with the steepest slope is the most selective, and the one with the smallest slope is the least selective.Moreover, the intercept (or some arbitrarily selected abscissa value, usually log fco for fhe reference substituent) should be a measure of reactivity in each reaction series. Thus, a correlation should exist between the slopes (selectivity) and intercepts (reactivity) of a family of related LFERs. It has been suggested that the slopes and intercepts should be linearly related, but the conditions required for linearity are seldom met, and it is instead common to find only a rough correlation, indicative of normal selectivity-reactivity behavior. The Br nsted slopes, p, for the halogenation of a series of carbonyl compounds catalyzed by carboxylate ions show a smooth but nonlinear correlation with log... 

The second aspect is more fundamental. It is related to the very nature of chemistry (quantum chemistry is physics). Chemistry deals with fuzzy objects, like solvent or substituent effects, that are of paramount importance in tautomerism. These effects can be modeled using LFER (Linear Free Energy Relationships), like the famous Hammett and Taft equations, with considerable success. Quantum calculations apply to individual molecules and perturbations remain relatively difficult to consider (an exception is general solvation using an Onsager-type approach). However, preliminary attempts have been made to treat families of compounds in a variational way [81AQ(C)105]. 

Br0nsted s correlation was developed some years before Hammett s. Here we present a formulation that shows how both LFERs are related for general acid catalysts. For the sake of simplicity, we ignore the statistical factors of p and q. The Hammett equation applied to the values of bh is... 

LFER. Consider the rate of base hydrolysis of a series of ethyl benzoates given by d[C2HsOH]/dt = LfdALQ COOQHsHOH"]. Show that a plot of log Jfcx versus log Ka, where Ka is the ionization constant of the parent benzoic acid, should be linear, and relate its slope to that given by a conventional Hammett plot of log k versus a. 

The Hammett equation is the best-known example of a linear free-energy relationship (LFER), that is, an equation which implies a linear relationship between free energies of reaction or activation for two related processes48. It describes the influence of polar meta-or para-substituents on reactivity for side-chain reactions of benzene derivatives. 

Much effort has been devoted to the attempt to set up scales of a0 values of general applicability. Only very limited success has been achieved in this direction150 and it seems naive to suppose that any simple LFER analogous to the Hammett equation could be successful in connection with the orthos fleet, except in rather limited and special situations. On the whole the various essays at scales of o0 values have not involved sulfinyl or sulfonyl... 

The Hammett equation is a linear free energy relationship (LFER). This can be demonstrated as follows for the case of equilibrium constants (for rate constants a similar demonstration can be made with AG instead of AG). For each reaction, where X is any group,... 

The Hammett equation is not the only LFER." ° Some, like the Hammett equation, correlate structural changes in reactants, but the Grunwald-Winstein relationship (see p. 452) correlates changes in solvent and the Brpnsted relation (see p. 337) relates acidity to catalysis. The Taft equation is a structure-reactivity equation that correlates only field effects. ... 

Xrx is a parameter characterizing the homologous series RX. The values of /j,r are direct measures of the polar inductive effects of alkyl groups relative to that of methyl and correlate well with Taft s a values. Substituent-induced IP shifts can thus be handled by linear free energy relationships (LFER) of the Hammett pcr-type. 

Three types of the LFERs may be distinguished. The first group (A) includes expressions valid for a specific type of compound and certain processes. They are based on well-defined reference processes, which serve for the determination of the values of the constants These LFERs usually are named after the authors who have introduced them (Hammett, Taft, Brown, etc.), and special symbols for the parameters a and p are used (see Table I). The advantage of these established LFERs is the availability of... 

The broad applicability of LFERs for heterogeneous catalytic reactions has been demonstrated independently by Kraus (23) and Yoneda (24-27). The first author concentrated mostly on the established relationships such as the Hammett and Taft equations, whereas Yoneda has concentrated particularly on correlations with reactivity indices and other quantities. Since then, LFERs have been widely applied to heterogeneous catalytic reactions, and experience has been gained as to the suitability of each different type. An important step has been made toward an interpretation of the slopes of linear correlations (parameter a in Eq. 3) as the quantities that are closely connected with reaction mechanisms. 

What is the molecular significance of LFER parameters such as the Bronsted parameter, a, or the Hammett p parameter ... 

---