Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Functional different functionality

Unfortunately, many commonly used methods for parameter estimation give only estimates for the parameters and no measures of their uncertainty. This is usually accomplished by calculation of the dependent variable at each experimental point, summation of the squared differences between the calculated and measured values, and adjustment of parameters to minimize this sum. Such methods routinely ignore errors in the measured independent variables. For example, in vapor-liquid equilibrium data reduction, errors in the liquid-phase mole fraction and temperature measurements are often assumed to be absent. The total pressure is calculated as a function of the estimated parameters, the measured temperature, and the measured liquid-phase mole fraction. [Pg.97]

The sum of the squared differences between calculated and measures pressures is minimized as a function of model parameters. This method, often called Barker s method (Barker, 1953), ignores information contained in vapor-phase mole fraction measurements such information is normally only used for consistency tests, as discussed by Van Ness et al. (1973). Nevertheless, when high-quality experimental data are available. Barker s method often gives excellent results (Abbott and Van Ness, 1975). [Pg.97]

Equations (7-8) and (7-9) are then used to calculate the compositions, which are normalized and used in the thermodynamic subroutines to find new equilibrium ratios,. These values are then used in the next Newton-Raphson iteration. The iterative process continues until the magnitude of the objective function 1g is less than a convergence criterion, e. If initial estimates of x, y, and a are not provided externally (for instance from previous calculations of the same separation under slightly different conditions), they are taken to be... [Pg.121]

In the case of the adiabatic flash, application of a two-dimensional Newton-Raphson iteration to the objective functions represented by Equations (7-13) and (7-14), with Q/F = 0, is used to provide new estimates of a and T simultaneously. The derivatives with respect to a in the Jacobian matrix are found analytically while those with respect to T are found by finite-difference approximation... [Pg.121]

Subroutine FUNDR. This subroutine calculates the required derivatives for REGRES by central difference, using EVAL to calculate the objective functions. [Pg.218]

Value of the objective function [(7-23) or (7-24)] at T + AT used for finite difference approximation of the derivative. [Pg.327]

The wave function T i oo ( = 11 / = 0, w = 0) corresponds to a spherical electronic distribution around the nucleus and is an example of an s orbital. Solutions of other wave functions may be described in terms of p and d orbitals, atomic radii Half the closest distance of approach of atoms in the structure of the elements. This is easily defined for regular structures, e.g. close-packed metals, but is less easy to define in elements with irregular structures, e.g. As. The values may differ between allo-tropes (e.g. C-C 1 -54 A in diamond and 1 -42 A in planes of graphite). Atomic radii are very different from ionic and covalent radii. [Pg.45]

Two molecules of vitamin A are formed from one molecule of -carotene. Vitamin A crystallizes in pale yellow needles m.p. 64 C. It is optically inactive. It is unstable in solution when heated in air, but comparatively stable without aeration. Vitamin A is manufactured by extraction from fish-liver oils and by synthesis from / -ionone. The role of vitamin A in vision seems to be different from its systemic function. See also relincne and rhodopsin. [Pg.422]

Apolar stationary phases having no dipolar moments, that is their center of gravities of their positive and negative electric charges coincide. With this type of compound, the components elute as a function of their increasing boiiing points. The time difference between the moment of injection and the moment the component leaves the column is called the retention time. [Pg.21]

This technique is based on the selectivity of a solvent for different families or individual components in a mixture. Solvent extraction can be either analytical or preparatory in function. [Pg.24]

This relation is used only for temperatures greater than 0°C. The average error is about 5 kJ/kg. Figure 4.5 gives the enthalpy for petroleum fractions whose is 11.8 as a function of temperature. For K, factors different from 11.8, a correction identical to that used for Cpi is used (to... [Pg.124]

At low temperatures, using the original function/(T ) could lead to greater error. In Tables 4.11 and 4.12, the results obtained by the Soave method are compared with fitted curves published by the DIPPR for hexane and hexadecane. Note that the differences are less than 5% between the normal boiling point and the critical point but that they are greater at low temperature. The original form of the Soave equation should be used with caution when the vapor pressure of the components is less than 0.1 bar. In these conditions, it leads to underestimating the values for equilibrium coefficients for these components. [Pg.157]

The most important curve is the TBP distillation, properly defined as T = f (% volume or weight). Figure 8.4 shows the distillation curves for an Arabian Light crude. The chart is used to obtain yields for the different cuts as a function of the selected distillation range. [Pg.333]

Two types of compounds having different functions are used detergents and dispersants. [Pg.358]

The function of offshore production facilities are very much the same as those described for land operations. An offshore production platform is rather like a gathering station hydrocarbons have to be collected, processed and evacuated for further treatment or storage. However, the design and layout of the offshore facilities are very different from those on land for the following reasons ... [Pg.264]

In the work presented here, a slightly different two-parameter transient model has been used. Instead of specifying a center frequency b and the bandwidth parameter a of the amplitude function A(t) = 6 , a simple band pass signal with lower and upper cut off frequencies and fup was employed. This implicitly defined a center frequency / and amplitude function A t). An example of a transient prototype both in the time and frequency domain is found in Figure 1. [Pg.90]

Auto-correlation and Inter-correlation Functions allow a good discrimination between these two types of defects by quantifying the resemblance between the different echoes and their derivatives. [Pg.226]

This correction function was calculated for different kinds of excitation coils, like circular coils without ferrite core, spiral coils, double-D coils and a sheet inducer. For this purpose the eddy current density was determined for frequencies between 10 and 1000 Hz and for depths between 0 and 30 mm. [Pg.256]

Fig. 2.2 Correcting function e for a real penetration depth, calculated by 3D-FEMfor different coils and frequencies. Fig. 2.2 Correcting function e for a real penetration depth, calculated by 3D-FEMfor different coils and frequencies.
In Fig. 3a,b are shown respectively the modulus of the measured magnetic induction and the computed one. In Fig. 3c,d we compare the modulus and the Lissajous curves on a line j/ = 0. The results show a good agreement between simulated data and experimental data for the modulus. We can see a difference between the two curves in Fig. 3d this one can issue from the Born approximation. These results would be improved if we take into account the angle of inclination of the sensor. This work, which is one of our future developpements, makes necessary to calculate the radial component of the magnetic field due to the presence of flaw. This implies the calculation of a new Green s function. [Pg.330]

So, a comparison of different types of magnetic field sensors is possible by using the impulse response function. High amplitude and small width of this bell-formed function represent a high local resolution and a high signal-to-noise-characteristic of a sensor system. On the other hand the impulse response can be used for calculation of an unknown output. In a next step it will be shown a solution of an inverse eddy-current testing problem. [Pg.372]


See other pages where Functional different functionality is mentioned: [Pg.90]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.372]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.67 ]




SEARCH



Antibiotics different functions

Atomic coordinates difference function

Atomic force microscopy work-function difference

Bond dissociation wave function differences

Chemical Interactions to the Adhesion Between Evaporated Metals and Functional Croups of Different Types at Polymer Surfaces

Chemoselective Functionalization of Different Carbonyl Group

Constitutional isomers with different functional groups

Difference decay function

Difference distribution function

Difference function

Difference function

Difference function, atomic pair correlation

Difference pair correlation function

Difference pair-distribution function

Difference work function

Electron-density difference function

Examples of Functional Materials with Different Defect Structures

Fukui function finite difference approximations

Fukui function finite difference method

Function difference Green

Functionality different

Functionality different

Height difference correlation function

Interactive difference function

Monomer Different functionality

Monomers with Different Functional Groups

Physico-Chemical and Functional Differences of Polysaccharides

Potentials, Surface Potential Differences, and the Thermionic Work Function

Response time as a function of the thermal driving force for an idealized heat exchanger at different hold-up values

Silk fibers with different functions

Similarity of structure functions associated with different overlaps, scaling law

Viscometric functions Normal stress differences)

Wave function difference

© 2024 chempedia.info