Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Height difference correlation function

To quantify the roughness, we evaluate the height-difference correlation function. [Pg.63]

For the calculation of the response of the QCM, the height-height pair correlation function is needed [80]. When rough structures having different scales do not correlate, the total correlation function can be written in the form ... [Pg.131]

In order to compare the results from PD with the simulations, the input properties, and silo geometry have to be the same. As the results of PD in the previous section are based on a first order negative exponential correlation function, this function was used as well for the simulations. Three different input properties were used with different characteristic volumes (Vci) 40 and 400 m3. The silo volume was approximately 40,000 m3, with a height of 50 m and a diameter of 32 m. This relatively high silo was chosen because constant angles over the silo height are required (as indicated in Fig. 1) for a thorough comparison with PD. As the input properties are realizations of a stochastic process 400 repetitions were done per simulation. [Pg.298]

Figure 18.9 The grain height as a function of the grain diameter for three different precursor dilutions. The maximum grain height for larger grain diameters is correlated to the thickness of the amorphous film after the drying step. Figure 18.9 The grain height as a function of the grain diameter for three different precursor dilutions. The maximum grain height for larger grain diameters is correlated to the thickness of the amorphous film after the drying step.
Fig. 7.7 The G(r) s for 0.5 A (red) and 0.33 A (green) data compared with the weighted sums of the partial ptiir correlation functions of Ferlat et al. [4] (broken black lines). The weighted sum for 0.29 A is shown for comparison. It is important to note that no attempt to convolute the weighted partial pair correlation functions with an experimented resolution has been made. While the second petik height is in reasonable agreement, there is a significant difference in the first peak height for both wavelengths... Fig. 7.7 The G(r) s for 0.5 A (red) and 0.33 A (green) data compared with the weighted sums of the partial ptiir correlation functions of Ferlat et al. [4] (broken black lines). The weighted sum for 0.29 A is shown for comparison. It is important to note that no attempt to convolute the weighted partial pair correlation functions with an experimented resolution has been made. While the second petik height is in reasonable agreement, there is a significant difference in the first peak height for both wavelengths...
The structural properties of the NaCl solution calculated from this simulation are not significantly different from preceding ones. The characteristic distances an heights of the ion-water and water-water radial pair correlation function remain almost unchanged whether a temperature control mechanism is built... [Pg.16]

The mass-transfer coefficients depend on complex functions of diffii-sivity, viscosity, density, interfacial tension, and turbulence. Similarly, the mass-transfer area of the droplets depends on complex functions of viscosity, interfacial tension, density difference, extractor geometry, agitation intensity, agitator design, flow rates, and interfacial rag deposits. Only limited success has been achieved in correlating extractor performance with these basic principles. The lumped parameter deals directly with the ultimate design criterion, which is the height of an extraction tower. [Pg.1464]

Mass resolution describes the capability of an MS to distinguish ions with different m/z values. It is defined by the M/AM equation in which M is the m/z ratio of a mass peak and AM is the full width of a peak at half its maximum height. The mass resolution of an instrument often correlates with its accuracy. Mass range indicates the m/z range at which the mass analyzer best functions. For example, quadrupole mass analyzers exhibit a mass range of up to 4000 m/z, while the mass ranges of TOF extend up to 100,000. The operating principles of common MS instruments are discussed below. [Pg.381]


See other pages where Height difference correlation function is mentioned: [Pg.390]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.193]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.363 ]




SEARCH



Difference function

Functional different functionality

Functionality different

Height differences

© 2024 chempedia.info