Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Formaldehyde transfer coefficient

Overall heat transfer coefficient Mass feeding rate Ammonia feed mass fraction Formaldehyde charge fraction Exothermic heat of reaction... [Pg.432]

The value of the transfer coefficient a is usually 0.50. In the electrochemical oxidation of an organic molecule the transfer coefficient a may be considerably less than 0.50. One example is the oxidation of formaldehyde in electroless deposition of copper. [Pg.168]

Therefore, the chapter is mainly focused on the design of model-based control approaches. Namely, a controller-observer control strategy is considered, where an observer is designed to estimate the heat released by the reaction, together with a cascade temperature control scheme. The performance of this control strategy are further improved by introducing an adaptive estimation of the heat transfer coefficient. Finally, the application of the proposed methods to the phenol-formaldehyde reaction studied in the previous chapters is presented. [Pg.6]

In cooperation with DSM, MCN developed a method of measurement for the determination of the formaldehyde release from particle board, based on a theorie for mass transfer, implying that under steady state conditions the emission of formaldehyde of a given particle board can and should be defined by two parameters of the particular board. These two parameters are (1) Ce defined as the equilibrium formaldehyde concentration (with ventilation rate 0") and (2) kgg defined as the overall mass transfer coefficient of the board. In (ideal mixed) climate rooms the stationary formaldehyde... [Pg.125]

One of the important parameters in producing urea formaldehyde resins with a low formaldehyde level, is the so called molar ratio. Table III shows that the parameter Cg is closely related to the molar ratio, which varies from 0.70 to 1.30. The mass transfer coefficient is not related to the molar ratio, while this parameter in principle is only related to the nature of the surface. [Pg.133]

Figure 9 illustrates the effect of veneering on formaldehyde emission of particleboard. For the veneering the same type of resin was used as in the production of the particleboard. Pressing conditions are not comparable. Veneering has increased the equilibrium value a little, from 0.48 to 0.56 mg/m. The mass transfer coefficient however, decreased very much. The mass transfer resistance shows an increase from 2,400 sec/m to 11,000 sec/m. In the case at issue, the formaldehyde concentration, at a loading factor of 1 m /m of the veneered particleboard, is below that of the bare particleboard, only at a ventilation rate in excess of 0.2 per hour. [Pg.137]

After a few hours of circulating, different steady state concentrations are in fact found in the two burettes. In other words, one particleboard continually absorbs formaldehyde from the other. In this case particleboard 1 absorbs formaldehyde from particleboard 2. Table VIII shows the formaldehyde emission parameters of the two boards. Especially the equilibrium values are different, the mass transfer coefficients do not differ much. [Pg.138]

The amount of formaldehyde per unit of time emitted to the air, is proportional to the installed surface (A) and the concentration gradient (Cg - Cg) with kgg (mass transfer coefficient) as the proportional coefficient. [Pg.140]

The concentration of formaldehyde in the air of a room containing particleboards, will depend on the content of formaldehyde in the boards and on the rate of its release. The formaldehyde content of a particleboard is determined by the binder used to manufacture the board and a number of production parameters. The release rate is affected by the temperature and the relative humidity of the surrounding air, but also by some of the physical properties of the board. The most important one probably is the diffusion resistance of the surface layer, which may be expressed by means of a mass transfer coefficient. [Pg.203]

If the mass transfer coefficient is sufficiently low, the emission will be so slow that the ventilation can manage to remove the formaldehyde at almost the same rate as it is liberated, resulting in a very low formaldehyde concentration in the air. This presentation deals with what can be achieved in terms of reduced mass transfer coefficient and emission rate by applying some sort of diffusion barrier to the surface of the particleboard. The diffusion barriers studied comprise overlays or surface finishes commonly applied when particleboard is used as a building material, such as wall paper, painting and floor covering, but even overlays that are used by the furniture and joinery industries, such as veneers, melamine facing and resin saturated paper foils (finish foils). [Pg.204]

In a ventilated system the exhaust air will remove some of the emitted formaldehyde, and a steady state concentration will be established. The steady state concentration will be lower than the equilibrium concentration. How much lower, will depend on the ventilation rate, the particleboard loading and the mass transfer coefficient. [Pg.205]

The Bell method can be used to determine the equilibrium concentration of formaldehyde, C in the model above. When the formaldehyde concentration in the Bell system is plotted against time, the initial slope of the resulting curve can be used to determine the mass transfer coefficient, kg in the same model. [Pg.205]

Reduce the mass transfer coefficient, kg, i.e. the rate of formaldehyde transfer from the particleboard surface into the room air, without C being affected. This mechanism is likely for coatings and overlays which present a physical restriction to the formaldehyde diffusion, but do not react with formaldehyde. [Pg.206]

Our work shows that all the finishes and overlays that we have tested, reduce the mass transfer coefficient and lower the rate of formaldehyde emission. [Pg.208]

Some of the overlays that are common in the woodworking industries involve the use of a formaldehyde-based adhesive. In such cases the adhesive can increase the emission potential so that, at least for a period of time, some of the gain due to a reduced mass transfer coefficient is lost. [Pg.208]

Phenol Formaldehyde (PF). Phenol formaldehyde is known for its high strength, stiffness, hardness and its low tendency to creep. It is also known for its high toughness, and depending on its reinforcement, it will also exhibit high toughness at low temperatures. PF also has a low coefficient of thermal expansion. Phenol formaldehyde can be compression molded, transfer molded and injection-compression molded. Typical applications for phenol formaldehyde include distributor caps, pulleys, pump components, handles for irons, etc. It should not be used in direct contact with food. [Pg.31]

This compound oxidizes in a flow system at temperatures as low as 120 °C and possesses a region of negative temperature coefficient between about 330 and 370 °C. Products include acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, formic acid and peroxides. Below 250 °C, acetaldehyde is the sole non-peroxidic organic product [95]. This is formed by a 1 5 intramolecular H-transfer followed by j3-scission. [Pg.474]

Although formaldehyde is found in remote areas, it probably is not transported there but is generated from longer-lived precursors that have been transported there (NRC 1981). Formaldehyde is soluble and will transfer into rain and surface water. Based upon the Henry s law constant for formaldehyde, volatilization from water is not expected to be significant. No experimental data were found concerning the adsorption of formaldehyde to soil, but because of the low octanol/water partition coefficient (log K,=0. 5) (SRC 1995b), little adsorption to soil or sediment is expected to occur. No evidence of bioaccumulation has been found. [Pg.305]

Partition of the reaction products of the above reaction between CCl.-iF and 80% methanol involved shaking a portion of the supernatant at —78°C. with an equal volume of 80% methanol precooled to —78°C. The aqueous layer, on separation, was rapidly transferred to and mixed with an equal volume of CCbF at —78°C. On separation of the two layers, 2-ml. aliquots were removed from each and analyzed for peracid, acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, acetone, and formaldehyde in the usual way. The temperature was maintained as close to —78°C. as possible until the analysis stage was reached. The procedure was repeated with CC1 F solutions of the authentic compounds under identical conditions, and partition coefficients were compared. [Pg.6]

Because formaldehyde is volatile, its residues coefficient should be less than 1. At present, the law of skin absorption of formaldehyde is stiU unclear and both the percentage of transferred to a human body and residues coefficient take on the values 1, which makes the risk increases. [Pg.122]


See other pages where Formaldehyde transfer coefficient is mentioned: [Pg.168]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.976]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.121]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.93 , Pg.129 ]




SEARCH



Formaldehyde coefficients

Formaldehyde transfer

© 2024 chempedia.info