Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Footprint sites

Chemical reagents have been used in solution to footprint sites of interaction in noncovalent complexes. Only a limited set of studies have been performed in the gas phase using ion—molecule reactions between a charged noncovalent complex and various neutral reagents [72,73]. They can be classified into two areas H/D exchange reactions [72] and ligand switching reactions [73]. Recent results in these two areas are discussed below. [Pg.117]

Particularly for jack-up rigs, site surveys may have to be carried out prior to each reemployment to ensure that the rig is positioned away from the previously formed footprints (depressions on the sea-bed left by the jack-up legs on a previous job). [Pg.44]

Equipment and Economics A veiy large electrodialysis plant would produce 500 /s of desalted water. A rather typical plant was built in 1993 to process 4700 mVday (54.4 /s). Capital costs for this plant, running on low-salinity brackish feed were 1,210,000 for all the process equipment, including pumps, membranes, instrumentation, and so on. Building and site preparation cost an additional 600,000. The building footprint is 300 itt. For plants above a threshold level of about 40 m Vday, process-equipment costs usually scale at around the 0.7 power, not too different from other process eqiiip-ment. On this basis, process equipment (excluding the ouilding) for a 2000 mVday plant would have a 1993 predicted cost of 665,000. [Pg.2034]

Site Size Most MF processes require a smaller footprint than competing processes. Reduction in total-area reqmremeuts are sometimes a decisive economic advantage for MF. It may be apparent that... [Pg.2046]

NO emissions did not exceed 2 ng Nm s and their measurement was only possible by chamber methods. The low NO emissions but high NjO emissions show that denitrification was the main source of NjO at this site. The discrepancies between the chamber and micrometeorological methods illustrated the need to define the flux-footprint of a micrometeorological measurement very carefully, and to use this information in the field to choose the locations in which chambers are placed. Without such an approach, the integration of results from chambers into estimates of field-scale emission remains an uncertain method. [Pg.79]

The civil stractures required for the plant may add significantly to cost. If the new plant, with its relatively small footprint, can be sited within an existing infrastracture, this will lead to significant savings. [Pg.319]

Rothmel, RK, DL Shinbarger, MR Parsek, TL Aldrich, AM Chakrabarty (1991) Functional analysis of the Pseudomonas putida regulatory protein CatR transcriptional studies and determination of the CatR DNA-binding site by hydroxyl-radical footprinting. J Bacterial 173 4717-4724. [Pg.397]

Site Size Most MF processes require a smaller footprint than competing processes. Reduction in total-area requirements are sometimes a decisive economic advantage for MF. It may be apparent that the floor-space costs in a pharmaceutical facility are high, but municipal facilities for water and sewage treatment are often located on expensive real estate, giving MF an opportunity despite its higher costs otherwise. [Pg.57]

Marker excision by site-specific recombination Very clean excision, small footprint Complex cloning procedure. Requires additional transgene encoding Cre recombinase 39... [Pg.257]

Chemical and hazardous materials industry infrastructure includes substantial facility and equipment investment it is highly capital intensive. Most chemical industry facilities contain very specialized process equipment that would be difficult to replace quickly. A good example is an oil refinery plant, where if the cracking facilities were destroyed they could not be replaced anytime soon. It is interesting to note that some chemical industry facilities (e.g., oil refineries) require large amounts of land (have a large footprint) but are typically staffed with few employees relative to on-site land requirements. [Pg.44]

The off-site consequence analysis must be reviewed and updated every five years. However, if process changes might reasonably be expected to cause the worst-case scenario footprint or signature to increase or decrease by a factor of two or more, then the OCA must be revised and the risk management plan must be resubmitted to USEPA or designated authority within six months. [Pg.75]

The 5 LTR has been extensively characterized in vitro, and binding sites for several cellular transcription factors have been identified using DNase I in vitro footprinting and gel retardation assays (Fig. Ic) (see for reviews Roebuck and Saifuddin, 1999 Pereira et ai, 2000 Rohr et al, 2003). [Pg.379]

The pilot and experimentation plant at the Pohla mine site was built in a eoncrete pond (part of the former mine operation), with a footprint of 475m and a total volume of 830m. After the installations were fitted, the usable volume was 415m. The installations divided the concrete pond into seven treatment basins (eells) whieh served various purposes ... [Pg.183]

Identification of the HupR binding site at the hupS promoter by DNase footprinting analysis... [Pg.7]

Sullivan D, Chiara DC, Cohen JB. 2002. Mapping the agonist binding site of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor by cysteine scanning mutagenesis antagonist footprint and secondary structure predictions. Mol Pharmacol 61 ... [Pg.453]

Hampel and Burke observed that protection of hammerhead backbone sites in Mg + solutions required assembly of the full ribozyme-substrate complex. In other words, testing of ribozyme or substrate separately in the hydroxyl footprinting assay showed essentially complete hydrolysis of all nucleotides (Figure 2B of reference 56). In contrast, the fully assembled ribozyme-substrate complex showed protection of nucleotides structurally near the densely packed three-helix junction of hammerhead constructs HH16, HHal, and RNA 6. Two of the ribozyme group of protected nucleotides (Gs, Ae) are part of the conserved uridine U-turn seen in all known hammerhead constructs. (See Figures 6.10,6.11, and 6.12.) The footprinting results are collected in Table 6.5. [Pg.290]


See other pages where Footprint sites is mentioned: [Pg.308]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.2194]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.912]    [Pg.937]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.1032]    [Pg.1032]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.292]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.308 ]




SEARCH



Footprinting

© 2024 chempedia.info