Food intake, prediction

However, most patients are not sufficiently predictable in their schedule and food intake to allow tight glucose control with this approach. If the fasting glucose in the morning is too high, the evening NPH dose may be moved to bedtime (now three total injections per day). This may provide sufficient intensification of therapy for some patients. 

Fig. 2.15. EDI (Estimated Daily Intake) predicted from human body residues in Fig. 2.14 and ADI (Average Daily Intake) reported worldwide. ADI for Korean was predicted from average residues of individual food-groups in Table 2.7 (l)-(ll) in Fig. 2.14, (12) Charnley and Doull (2005), (13) Bocio and Domingo (2005), (14) Baars et al. (2004), (15) Darnerud et al. (2006), (16) this study, (17) Kiviranta et al. (2004), (18) Sasamoto et al. (2006), (19) Focant et al. (2002), (20) Tsutsumi et al. (2001), (21) Loutfy et al. (2006). Two dotted lines indicate tolerable daily intake (TDI) guidelines of WHO.

The glucose-insulin system has been presented in a context of classic control theory as a combination of a P1D control and predictive control. This context may be too simplified. With a network of sensors, a complex traffic of nutrients and metabolites, and day to day variations in food intake, it is difficult to assign a single controlled variable, like plasma glucose concentration, to the control system. Equally important variables could be intracellular glucose concentration, the flux of fatty acids and amino acids. 

Although formulation variables such as particle size and excipients have not been discussed here, they are highly relevant in practice. In addition, food can play an important role in oral absorption and thus bioavailability. Food may increase blood flow and thus limit the extent of first-pass effect. Bile secretion increases with food intake, which may enhance the solubility of lipophilic compounds. Attempts have been made to predict the effect of food on the extent of drug absorption [87]. Gastric emptying time is another factor, which depends on the type and the amount of food intake and physiopathology, among others. 

In the physiological context, the malonyl-CoA level is controlled by the activity of ACC, which is phosphorylated/inactivated by AMPK. Changes in hypothalamic AMPK activity are consistent with the predicted changes in the malonyl-CoA level and food intake. Furthermore, central administration of the AMP analog, AICAR (5 -aminoimidazole-... 

Formulation of a ration or diet requires knowledge of the nutrient requirements of the animal (discussed in this part) and the nutritional value of the foods (discussed in Part 3) and, in order to combine these two, the amount of foods the animal can consume. Therefore, Chapter 17 gives details of factors affecting food intake in both monogastrics and ruminants and the methods used to predict food intake. 

Jeff Hall used NIR to analyze the major components of human breast milk [179]. This application could help nutritionists determine (quickly) whether a nursing mother needs supplements for her child. Additional work has followed this preliminary study. A study by Corvaglia et al. [180] determined that using NIR to measure the protein intake of preterm babies fed with breast milk was a suitable method to determine if the infant received the recommended amount. In a similar fashion, but at a point of care rather than at the bedside, Sauer and Kim [181] used NIR to analyze the milk of mother of preterm babies to adjust their food intake. Even though the number of sample was limited, authors reported very good correlation between measured and predicted fat, carbohydrate, and protein content for independent samples. No report of mother-to-mother variability was made. 

Blummel, M. and E.R. 0rskov, 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting of food intake in cattle. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 40, 109-119. 

Long term recording of body weight and possibly body composition would result in data for the substrate flow to or from body stores. The dietary food intake can be assessed by questionnaires or prediction formulas, provided by earlier measurements. So energy expenditure and substrate oxidation rates can be calculated from energy and substrates balances. All these approaches would not need calorimetry at all it could however be used to verify some of the results of these methods. Body composition can be assessed by various established methods like dual energy X-ray analysis (DEXA), skin fold measurements, underwater weighing and body impedance measurements. 

The absorption and transport processes of many of the phytochemicals present in food are complex and not fully understood, and prediction of their bioavailability is problematic. This is particularly true of the lipid-soluble phytochemicals. In this chapter the measurement of carotenoid bioavailability will be discussed. The carotenoids serve as an excellent example of where too little understanding of food structure, the complexity of their behaviour in foods and human tissues, and the nature and cause of widely different individual response to similar intakes, can lead to misinterpretation of study results and confusion in our understanding of the relevance of these (and other) compounds to human health. 

The degree of confidence in the final estimation of risk depends on variability, uncertainty, and assumptions identified in all previous steps. The nature of the information available for risk characterization and the associated uncertainties can vary widely, and no single approach is suitable for all hazard and exposure scenarios. In cases in which risk characterization is concluded before human exposure occurs, for example, with food additives that require prior approval, both hazard identification and hazard characterization are largely dependent on animal experiments. And exposure is a theoretical estimate based on predicted uses or residue levels. In contrast, in cases of prior human exposure, hazard identification and hazard characterization may be based on studies in humans and exposure assessment can be based on real-life, actual intake measurements. The influence of estimates and assumptions can be evaluated by using sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. - Risk assessment procedures differ in a range of possible options from relatively unso-... 

---