FMECA method

Materials and substances that are not regulated have been particularly at fault in food alerts and product recalls. This is why the inertia principles applied to plastics have been proposed to be generalized to all materials through an FMECA method presented in section 13.3.3. Its main benefit is to integrate within a unique approach assemblies of materials and components, which must comply with different regulations. 

Knowing that no analytical solution exists to this problem in the case of more than two layers or a mixed Robin boundary condition as shown in equation [13.1], we can find a complete numerical implementation in [NGU 13] with a detailed physical formulation in [VIT 1 la, VIT 07b]. In order to be concise, only the material balance at equihbrium for an assembly composed of n components or layers is presented. This type of formttlation coupled with transport equations, initial and boimdary conditions, forms ad hoc the basis of the FMECA method presented in section 13.3.3. 

The solution lies In applying the principles of quality assurance analysis to the machine from a safety point of view, that Is to apply the FMECA method to the safety plan (FAILURE MODES, EFFECTS, CRITICALITY ANALYSIS). 

FMECA results a team of scientists performed a systematical risk analysis of the most important components using the FMECA method. In total, 29 potential failures were identified and their relative priorities for applying measures were determined. Seven of these failure modes are only influencing the operability itself and are not relevant form a safety point of view. From the remaining 22 failure modes, 6 are related to mechanical operations and the remaining 16 are indirectly related to the hazardous properties of the solvents. Since those properties are not directly evaluated by the procedure, the relative importance and magnitude of the effects remain unclear after the FMECA analysis. 

Table 3. Comparison of the risk priorities in example 2 using LARA and FMECA method.

Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) method. 

FMECA is an extended version of FMEA. More specifically, when FMEA is extended to categorize or group each potential failure effect in regard to its level of severity (this includes documenting critical and catastrophic failures), the method is referred to as FMECA. The FMECA method was... 

The FMECA method requires the assessor to have a clear understanding of the function of each component along with all the associated inputs and outputs. The failure modes (deviations from design intent) are then investigated and the FMECA form is completed for each module. In this case the forms also... 

FMEA Failure mode and effect analysis the steps involving risk to measurement of the criticality of causes (frequency multiplied by severity) FMEA a simplified approach to the FMECA method which can be used in the absence of quemtified data processes... 

We previously encountered failure modes and effects (FMEA) and failure modes effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) as qualitative methods for accident analysis. These tabular methods for reliability analysis may be made quantitative by associating failure rates with the parts in a systems model to estimate the system reliability. FMEA/FMECA may be applied in design or operational phases (ANSI/IEEE Std 352-1975, MIL-STD-1543 and MIL-STD-1629A). Typical headings in the F.Mld. A identify the system and component under analysis, failure modes, the ef fect i>f failure, an estimale of how critical apart is, the estimated probability of the failure, mitigaturs and IHissihiy die support systems. The style and contents of a FMEA are flexible and depend upon the. ilitcLiives of the analyst. 

The assembly process (Figure 10-1) brings together all of the assessment tasks to provide the risk, its significance, how it was found, its sensitivity to uncertainties, confidence limits, and how it may be reduced by system improvements. Not all PSAs use fault trees and event trees. This is especially true of chemical PSAs that may rely on HAZOP or FMEA/FMECAs. Nevertheless the objectives are the same accident identification, analysis and evaluation. Figure 10-1 assumes fault tree and event tree techniques which should be replaced by the equivalent methods that are used. 

Failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) This method tabulates a list of equipment in the process along with all the possible failure modes for each item. The effect of a particular failure is considered with respect to the process. 

From those techniques given in Table 1 my personal preference is for failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA). This technique can be applied to both equipment and facilities and can be used to methodically break down the analysis of a complex process into a series of manageable steps. It is a powerful tool for summarizing the important modes of failure, the factors that may cause these failures, and their likely effects. It also incorporates the degree of severity of the consequences, their respective probabilities of occurrence, and their detectability. It must be stressed, however, that the outcome of the risk assessment process should be independent of the tool used and must be able to address all of the risks associated with the instrument that is being assessed. 

To identify the hazards of the EUC in all modes of operation, the event sequences leading to the hazards, and the EUC risks associated with the hazards have to be analyzed (methods are well known like FTA, FMEA, FMECA, etc.)... 

This leads us to the notion of detectability - the extent to which we are able to identify deviation from the system s requirements or normal operation. Such is the importance of detectability that in some systematic methods of hazard identification such as FMECA detectability is included in the calculation of risk itself (see Sect. 13.6.1). In this way the lack of detectability is given an equal weight to likelihood and severity in deriving the Risk Priority Number, the main driver for prioritising corrective actions. 

One hazards analysis technique used to analyze equipment items is FMEA. The method examines the ways in which an equipment item can fail (its failure modes) and examinees the effects or consequences of such failures. If the criticality of each failure is to be considered, then the method becomes a Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality (FMECA) Analysis. The consequences can be to do with safety, reliability, or environmental performance. 

A methodical examination of a process, plant and procedure which identifies hazards, assesses risks and proposes measures which will reduce risks to an acceptable level. (May use inter alia Hazops. Fault Tree Analysis, Check-lists, Event Tree Analysis. FMECA, etc). 

The most careful and consolidated risk analysis methods, as FTA, ETA, FMEA/FMECA, have serious problems with the possibility of finding the data which analysis are based on. 

HSE assessments have a long tradition within the oil-and gas industry. These assessments use a wide range of methodologies, from the strict quantitative methods such as QRA (Quantitative Risk Analysis) and FMECA (Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis) to the more qualitative methods such as HAZOP (HAZard OPerability analysis). Most methods combine qualitative and quantitative data and approaches. For example, an FMECA basically uses generic failure data, expert judgments are likewise important. 

Used originally as a reliability tool, the FMEA is now often used to identify and prioritize safety problems associated with hardware failures. This is usually done by including a risk assessment code (RAC) in the analysis (Table 14-1). (Note When a RAC or other method of quantifying is used to identify critical safety items, some organizations and analysts call the technique failure mode and effects criticality analysis [FMECA].)... 

The hazard identification and evaluation of a complex process by means of a diagram or model that provides a comprehensive, overall view of the process, including its principal elements and the ways in which they are interrelated. There are four principal methods of analysis failure mode and effect, fault tree, THERP, and cost-benefit analysis. Each has a number of variations, and more than one may be combined in a single analysis. See also Cost-Benefit Analysis Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA/FMECA) Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) THERP (Technique for Human Error Rate Probability). 

FMEA is a method widely used in the industrial sector to perform reliability and safety analyses of engineering systems. It is a powerful tool used to perform analysis of each potential failure mode in a system to determine the effects of such failure modes on the total system [1,2]. When FMEA is extended to classify the effect of each potential failure according to its severity, it is called failure mode effects and criticality analysis (FMECA). 

FMEA is an analytical method used to identify potential problems in the product and in its process of development. It is an inductive method used for identification of hazards of a system with single point failure. When criticality analysis is added with FMEA it is known as failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA). It was used as early as 1950 in reliability engineering. FMEA/FMECA is mainly used for manufacturing, product development, etc. 

Detection is related to causes of failure and controls, as shown in Fig. IV/2.1-1. Thus there are two ways to look at it preventive and detection control. In prevention, with the help of existing controls, failure modes are prevented, whereas the other way detects the failure and takes corrective action before it reaches the customer (see Fig. IV/2.2.1-1). FMEA/FMECA identifies the method by which occurrence of failures/failure modes is detected by the operating personnel. Audio... 

L. S. Lipol, J. Haq, Risk analysis method FMEA/FMECA in the organizations. International... 

When the analysis includes evaluation of the criticality of the various failures, this method is referred to as Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). 

A failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) (or its simpler form, FMEA) is a systematic method of identif5dng a system failure modes. FMEA is implemented by considering each equipment item and associated systems in the plant, detailing the possible failure modes (e.g. leak or break in the case of pressure equipment), and determining their resulting effect on the rest of the system. The analysis is more concerned with specif5ung the likely effects and criticality of different modes of failure rather than the mechanisms or events leading to a specific failure [11]. 

A very important and powerful reliability analysis tool is the FMECA. FMECA identifies all potential weaknesses of a system by systematically identifying all the potential failure modes, their causes, failure frequencies, effects of the failure modes to the item, system and aircraft, severities of those effects, detection method of the failures and finally possible compensating provisions of the failures. There are several different standards and guidelines available which outlines how a EMECA can be performed and documented. Eor the aircraft programs MIL-STD-1629 A can be used as a reference and can be tailored in accordance with the program needs. (Department of Defense 1998) Steps to be followed while performing a EMECA, is shown in Figure 4. 

System safety is a discipline which identifies potential hazards and provides controls and certain counter measures by applying several safety assessment methods. System safety requires equipment MTBF data and FMECA Report findings in order to complete the Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)s and System Safety Assessments (SSA)s. A FMECA may be used to supplement the FTA by providing a complementary list of failure effects from the bottom up. 

FMECA is a good tool to assess the testability parameters of a system. Dormant failures list with severity information is provided to testability engineers via engineering coordination memos as well as FMECA reports. Testability engineers use failure detection method and failure rate columns of FMECA in order to calculate Fault Detection Rate (FDR) and Fault Isolation Rate (FIR) of a system. And also perform necessary revisions in order to lessen the number of dormant failures by taking into account the failure severities. 

In this section, the Method for Error Deduction and Incident Analysis (MEDIA) methodology is applied to human and organizational factors assessment. A combination of Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and MEDIA will be presented for pigging operations. Risk quantification of this assessment is based on the results of statistical analysis of past accidents as explained in section 2. 

FMECA sheet is slightly modified in order to use MEDIA along with conventional method for risk analysis as shown in Table 8. 

Technology assessment (Westrum 1991) aims considering the potential consequences of new technological system. Several methods and tools exist to support such assessment. In the context of safety and security, brainstorming, expert groups and traditional risk assessment methods such as FMECA (Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis) are often used with the purpose of identifying potential risks related to the adoption of a new technology. 

Risk assessment. Traditional risk assessment processes based on different methods (FMECA, HAZOP, THERP, CREAM, etc.). 

---