Fluoxetine TCAs with

Decision analytic models have been constmcted to compare the costs of TCAs with those of SSRIs and other compounds. These comparisons have included imipramine or amitriptyline versus paroxetine or sertraline (Stewart, 1994) imipramine versus paroxetine Qonsson and Bebbington, 1994 McFarland, 1994 Lapierre et al, 1995) fluoxetine versus amitriptyline, clomipramine, doxepin and imipramine (Le Pen et al, 1994) venlafaxine versus amitriptyline, desipramine. 

Other Antidepressants. Antidepressant refinements for the next 30 years primarily consisted of the development of new TCAs. However, in 1988, a novel antidepressant class, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), was introduced in the United States. The chief innovation of the SSRIs was that they afforded the comparable effectiveness of the TCAs with fewer side effects and minimal toxicity. The debut of the SSRIs coincided with the reworking of the nosology of the anxiety disorders in DSM-III and DSM-IV. As a result, the SSRIs have been studied extensively in each of the respective anxiety disorders and in many cases have obtained FDA approval for the treatment of one or more of these anxiety syndromes. The SSRIs currently available in the United States include citalopram (Celexa), escitalo-pram (Lexapro), fluoxetine (Prozac), fluvoxamine (Luvox), paroxetine (Paxil), and sertraline (Zoloft). 

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Currently available selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) include fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, and citalopram. At present, expert opinion does not support the usefulness of these serotonergic compounds in the treatment of core ADHD symptoms (National Institute of Mental Health, 1996). Nevertheless, because of the high rates of comorbidity in ADHD, these compounds are frequently combined with effective anti-ADHD agents (see Combined Pharmacotherapy, below). Since many psychotropics are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system (Nemeroff et ah, 1996), which in turn can be inhibited by the SSRIs, caution should be exercised when combining agents, such as the TCAs, with SSRIs. 

To date, only one study has been completed with an antidepressant other than a TCA combined with an antipsychotic in the treatment of PMD. Rothschild and colleagues (1993) investigated the efficacy of fluoxetine and perphenazine in the treatment of PMD and found that approximately 73% of 30 patients who met DSM-III-R (American Psychiatric Association 1987) criteria for major depression with psychotic features had at least a 50% reduction on their Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores over 5 weeks. Furthermore, the combination of fluoxetine and perphenazine appeared to be better tolerated than the combination of TCAs with antipsychotics. Although there is no evidence that monotherapy with an antidepressant other than amoxapine is efficacious, the combination therapy with many antidepressants other than the TCAs may prove useful. 

Fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, duloxetine, and other CYP450 2D6 inhibitors may increase TCA concentrations Cimetidine may increase plasma concentrations of TCAs and cause anticholinergic symptoms Phenothiazines or haloperidol may raise TCA blood concentrations May alter effects of antihypertensive drugs may inhibit hypotensive effects of clonidine Use of TCAs with sympathomimetic agents may increase sympathetic activity Methylphenidate may inhibit metabolism of TCAs... 

Patients prescribed concomitant phenytoin or carbamazepine with fluoxetine may have increased anticonvulsant plasma concentrations and symptoms of toxicity. Markedly increased plasma concentrations of TCAs with resulting symptoms of toxicity have been reported in patients taking fluoxetine. 

The affinity data for the SSRIs show that the SSRIs, as a group, are very potent and selective inhibitors for SERT compared with their affinity for NE and dopamine reuptake transporters (Fig. 21.6) and are more potent inhibitors of 5-HT reuptake than are the tertiary amine TCAs, with the exoeption of clomipramine. None of the SSRIs has substantial effeot on the NET or dopamine transporter. Of the SSRIs, sertraline exhibits the most potent inhibition of dopamine reuptake transporter, although it is still 100 times less potent in terms of inhibiting the dopamine versus the SERT. Therefore, the plasma oonoentration of sertraline would have to be increased by as much as 100 times to inhibit the dopamine reuptake transporter. When drugs are this selective for the reuptake transporters, differences in potency become olinioally irrelevant, because the plasma concentration oan be dose-adjusted to achieve inhibition of the desired transporter without affecting the other transporters. Clomipramine displays less affinity for SERT than oitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, or sertraline does and is more potent than fluoxetine. In terms of the ability to inhibit the NET, the SSRIs are two to three times less potent than the SNRI TCA, desipramine. 

No major teratogenic effects have been identified with the SSRIs or TCAs. However, evaluations to date suggest a possible association of fluoxetine with low birth weight and respiratory distress. Another study reported a sixfold greater likelihood of the occurrence of persistent pulmonary hypertension of newborn infants exposed to an SSRI after the twentieth week of gestation. 

Antidepressants. In the early 1980s, the recognition that depression is a frequent comorbid feature of BN coupled with the observation that appetite changes are a common feature of depression led researchers to evaluate antidepressant treatment for BN. Since that time, a series of controlled studies have demonstrated efficacy for a wide assortment of antidepressants including the TCAs imipramine (Tofranil) and desipramine (Norpramin), the MAOl phenelzine (Nardil), the SSRl fluoxetine (Prozac), and the atypical antidepressants trazodone (Desyrel) and bupropion (Wellbutrin). Overall, approximately two-thirds of antidepressant-treated patients with bulimia experience symptomatic improvement while nearly one-third achieves complete remission of binging and purging. In addition, the improvement in the symptoms of BN is not dependent on the presence of comorbid depression. 

Serotonin-Boosting Antidepressants. Antidepressants that enhance serotonin activity in the brain have also been studied in ADHD. In particular, fluoxetine (Prozac) and the serotonin-selective TCA clomipramine (Anafranil) have been the most extensively evaluated, with mixed success. They provide some benefit for aggression and impulsivity but don t significantly improve the poor attention of ADHD. As a result, the SSRls and other serotonin-boosting antidepressants do not appear to be effective first-line treatments for ADHD. Conversely, depressed patients without ADHD often show improvements in symptoms of concentration and attention when treated with a SSRI. Although SSRls are not widely used in the treatment of ADHD, they may be worthy of consideration in ADHD patients whose impulsivity is not controlled by stimulants alone. Those with comorbid conduct disorder or ODD who are prone to agitation and at times violent outbursts may be helped by the addition of a SSRI. 

Changing a patient from one MAOI to another, or to a TCA, requires a "wash-out" period of at least 2 weeks to avoid the possibility of a drug interaction. There is evidence to suggest that a combination of an MAOI with clomipramine is more likely to produce serious adverse effects than occurs with other TCAs. Regarding the newer non-tricyclic antidepressants, it is recommended that a "wash-out" period of at least 5 weeks be given before a patient on fluoxetine is given an MAOI this is due to the very long half-life of the main fluoxetine metabolite norfluoxetine. 

The field of antidepressant research was revolutionized in the late 1980s by the introduction of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), exemplified by fluoxetine (9). In addition to their antidepressant action, SSRIs have also proven effective for a broad range of psychiatric illnesses, and, more importantly, they demonstrated an improved tolerability profile as compared to TCAs and MAOIs due to their increased selectivity. On the other hand, SSRIs proved inferior to TCAs and MAOIs in their reduced antidepressant effects, slower onset of action, lower remission rates, and decreased ability to control the physical symptoms associated with depression. 

SSRIs—fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, and paroxetine, more than sertraline and citalopram Inhibition of metabolism at CYP2D6 isoenzyme TCA toxicity due to up to 10-fold increase in TCA levels with coadministration Lower TCA dose Baumann, 1996... 

All SSRIs (e.g., Feonard et ah, 1997) and in particular fluoxetine, Fluvosamine and paroxetine are metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes. Therefore, it is important to be aware of the possibility that the therapeutic or toxic effects of other medications metabolized by the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme system can be increased. Substantial inhibition of these isoenzymes converts a normal metabolizer into a slow metabolizer with regard to this specific pathway. Inhibition of the hepatic oxidative isoenzymes has been associated with a reduction, to a varying extent, in the clearance of many therapeutic agents, including the TCAs, several neuroleptics, antiarrhythmics, theophy-lene, terfenadine, benzodiazepines, carbamazepine, and warfarin (for a complete list, see Nemeroff et ak, 1996). 

TCAs in more serious forms of depression such as melancholic or psychotic depression. Some studies have suggested that the SSRls do not work as well as the TCAs in melancholic depression (Roose et al. 1994]. Likewise, one study has suggested that venlafaxine, a drug with a mechanism of action similar to that of the TCAs, was superior to fluoxetine in the treatment of inpatients with melancholic depression (Clerc et al. 1994]. Still, other metaanalyses have failed to find a difference in the efficacy of SSRls versus TCAs in serious forms of depression [Nierenberg 1994]. Nonetheless, given that most studies have employed TCAs, and some debate exists about the utility of SSRls in severe subtypes, it may be prudent to start with a TCA in most patients until the debate is further resolved. For patients who present a significant suicide risk or who have not been able to tolerate TCAs, the SSRls in combination with a standard antipsychotic appears an effective option. 

There have been five double-blind studies comparing the antidepressant efficacy of different SSRIs versus different TCAs in patients with HDRS scores of 25 or more (122, 123,124, 125 and 126). Three of these studies permitted inclusion of both inpatients and outpatients ( 122, 123 and 124), whereas the other two were solely done in outpatients (125, 126). Three were placebo-controlled (1.23, 125,126). In these three studies, the SSRI (i.e., fluvoxamine, paroxetine, or sertraline) was either superior to both the f CA and placebo or was comparable with the TCA and superior to placebo. In the other two studies, the SSRI was not different from the TCA and there was no placebo control. There have also been four studies and one metaanalysis of European clinical trials which found no difference in antidepressant efficacy between several different SSRIs and several different tertiary amine TCAs in patients hospitalized for major depression ( 127,128, 129,130 and 131). Finally, there have been two relatively small studies showing that fluoxetine and fluvoxamine both had antidepressant efficacy superior to placebo in patients with melancholia ( 132, 133). Another larger study failed to find a difference between paroxetine and amitriptyline in treating such patients ( 134). 

Of interest, treatment with hypericum is more expensive than with TCAs. Although it is somewhat less expensive than fluoxetine and paroxetine, depending on the formulation of hypericum used, its cost is comparable with that of sertraline. 

There is a great disparity of current knowledge regarding the effects of antidepressants on GYP enzymes. There have been almost no studies to test the potential effects of TCAs, MAOIs, and trazodone on GYP enzymes. There has only been one study with bupropion but it demonstrated that bupropion produces substantial inhibition of GYP 2D6 comparable with the effect of fluoxetine and paroxetine. In contrast to studies in these antidepressants, there have been extensive in vitro and in vivo studies of SSRIs, nefazodone, and venlafaxine. 

In comparison with TCAs, SSRIs cause fewer pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions but some (i.e., fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, paroxetine) cause more CYP enzyme mediated pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Unlike TCAs, SSRIs do not potentiate alcohol and perhaps even slightly antagonize its acute CNS effects. Nevertheless, there are some important adverse interactions. 

Available evidence suggests that due to this better tolerability, SSRIs are the best choice for patients with PD ( 113). SSRIs also offer benefits of ease of dosing and no safety or dependence problems. This contrasts with the poor tolerance associated with TCAs and with dependence problems associated with BZDs ( 114). In addition, because of the longer half-life, fluoxetine at doses ranging from 10 to 60 mg administered once weekly appears to be an effective maintenance treatment for patients with PD whose successful initial treatment was with daily fluoxetine (115). 

MAOIs, TCAs, lithium, clomipramine (alone or with topical steroids), fluoxetine, and fluvoxamine may reduce the frequency and intensity of this disorder ( 210, 226, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260 and 261) however, controlled trials are needed to conclusively establish efficacy. Relapse after initial improvement has also been reported, however. Data also indicate that both trichotillomania and OCD may respond to venlafaxine ( 262, 263). For children, such treatments should be reserved for only those with the more severe, refractory forms. 

---