Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

First catalyst particles

Reactants must diffuse through the network of pores of a catalyst particle to reach the internal area, and the products must diffuse back. The optimum porosity of a catalyst particle is deterrnined by tradeoffs making the pores smaller increases the surface area and thereby increases the activity of the catalyst, but this gain is offset by the increased resistance to transport in the smaller pores increasing the pore volume to create larger pores for faster transport is compensated by a loss of physical strength. A simple quantitative development (46—48) follows for a first-order, isothermal, irreversible catalytic reaction in a spherical, porous catalyst particle. [Pg.171]

Concentration gradient inside the catalyst particle. The continuity statement, at the catalyst surface, is similar to Pick s first law for diffiasion. The reaction rate is equal to the diffusion rate at the outside layer of the catalyst... [Pg.78]

The term, metal dusting, was first used about this time to describe the phenomenon associated with hydrocarbon processing. Butane dehydrogenation plant personnel noted how iron oxide and coke radiated outward through catalyst particles from a metal contaminant which acted as a nucleating point. The metal had deteriorated and appeared to have turned to dust. The phenomenon has been called catastrophic carburization and metal deterioration in a high temperature carbonaceous environment, but the term most commonly used today is metal dusting. [Pg.262]

Other workers do the opposite and add catalyst to the solvent (which again may be cooled) after first sweeping the flask with inert gas to remove air. It appears that if catalyst and solvent are mixed without removal of air (which is certainly not advised) fires are more likely to occur when catalyst is added to the solvent. Catalyst particles falling through organic vapor cannot be eflectively cooled and may enter the liquid glowing. On the other hand, when solvent is added rapidly to the catalyst, any tendency of the catalyst to heat is limited by quenching with a massive amount of liquid. [Pg.13]

As our first approach to the model, we considered the controlling step to be the mass transfer from gas to liquid, the mass transfer from liquid to catalyst, or the catalytic surface reaction step. The other steps were eliminated since convective transport with small catalyst particles and high local mixing should offer virtually no resistance to the overall reaction scheme. Mathematical models were constructed for each of these three steps. [Pg.162]

A first-order chemical reaction takes place in a reactor in which the catalyst pellets are platelets of thickness 5 mm. The effective diffusivity De for the reactants in the catalyst particle is I0"5 m2/s and the first-order rate constant k is 14.4 s . [Pg.644]

Solve the above equation for a first-order reaction under steady-state conditions, and obtain an expression for the mass transfer rate per unit area at the surface of a catalyst particle which is in the form of a thin platelet of thickness 2L. [Pg.861]

Consider a nonporous catalyst particle where the active surface is all external. There is obviously no pore resistance, but a film resistance to mass transfer can still exist. Determine the isothermal effectiveness factor for first-order kinetics. [Pg.379]

Most of the actual reactions involve a three-phase process gas, liquid, and solid catalysts are present. Internal and external mass transfer limitations in porous catalyst layers play a central role in three-phase processes. The governing phenomena are well known since the days of Thiele [43] and Frank-Kamenetskii [44], but transport phenomena coupled to chemical reactions are not frequently used for complex organic systems, but simple - often too simple - tests based on the use of first-order Thiele modulus and Biot number are used. Instead, complete numerical simulations are preferable to reveal the role of mass and heat transfer at the phase boundaries and inside the porous catalyst particles. [Pg.170]

Figure 10.5 shows the basic concept of the particle-level MR that gives (i) selective addition of reactants to the reaction zone and (ii) selective removal of products from the reaction zone. In the first case, if the diffusivity of one reactant (A) is much higher than that of the other components (B), the reactant (A) selectively diffuses into a catalyst particle through a membrane. Undesired reactions or the adsorption of poisons on the catalysts can be prevented. In the second case, the reaction has a hmited yield or is selectivity controlled by thermodynamics. The selective removal of the desired product from the catalyst particle gives enhancement of selectivity when the diffusivity of one product (R) is much greater than that of the other products (S). [Pg.218]

We start with an ideal, porous, spherical catalyst particle of radius R. The catalyst is isothermal and we consider a reaction involving a single reactant. Diffusion is described macroscopically by the first and second laws of Pick, stating that... [Pg.207]

In this exercise we shall estimate the influence of transport limitations when testing an ammonia catalyst such as that described in Exercise 5.1 by estimating the effectiveness factor e. We are aware that the radius of the catalyst particles is essential so the fused and reduced catalyst is crushed into small particles. A fraction with a narrow distribution of = 0.2 mm is used for the experiment. We shall assume that the particles are ideally spherical. The effective diffusion constant is not easily accessible but we assume that it is approximately a factor of 100 lower than the free diffusion, which is in the proximity of 0.4 cm s . A test is then made with a stoichiometric mixture of N2/H2 at 4 bar under the assumption that the process is far from equilibrium and first order in nitrogen. The reaction is planned to run at 600 K, and from fundamental studies on a single crystal the TOP is roughly 0.05 per iron atom in the surface. From Exercise 5.1 we utilize that 1 g of reduced catalyst has a volume of 0.2 cm g , that the pore volume constitutes 0.1 cm g and that the total surface area, which we will assume is the pore area, is 29 m g , and that of this is the 18 m g- is the pure iron Fe(lOO) surface. Note that there is some dispute as to which are the active sites on iron (a dispute that we disregard here). [Pg.430]

These issues are really major ones in research laboratories dealing with specialty chemicals and first level scale-up. Filterability can be a problem with M catalysts supported on classic materials such as carbon, owing to their tendency to pulverisation to give nanometer-sized catalyst particles that turn out to be very difficult to be recovered and successfully reused. [Pg.206]

The simplest case is represented by curve 1. The activity depends linearly on the number of unpoisoned active sites. The interpretation of curves 2 and 3 is less obvious. In the former case the interpretation might be that the least active sites are poisoned first, whereas in the latter case the most active sites are poisoned preferentially. Mass-transfer limitations also play a role in poisoning behaviour. If, for example, the poison is deposited in the outer shell of the catalyst particles, a decrease in catalytic activity can be expected as qualitatively described by curve 3 in Fig. 3.37. [Pg.92]

For catalytic reactions carried out in the presence of a heterogeneous catalyst, the observed reaction rate could be determined by the rate of mass transfer from the bulk of the reaction mixture and the outer surface of the catalyst particles or the rate of diffusion of reactants within the catalyst pores. Consider a simple first order reaction its rate must be related to the concentration of species S at the outer surface of the catalyst as follows ... [Pg.280]

Two ways to reduce the diffusion length in TBRs are 1) use of smaller catalyst particles, or 2) use of an egg-shell catalyst. The first remedy, however, will increase pressure drop until it becomes unacceptable, and the second reduces the catalyst load in the reaction zone, making the loads of the TBR and the MR comparable. For instance, the volumetric catalyst load for a bed of 1 mm spherical particles with a 0.1 mm thick layer of active material is 0.27. The corresponding load for a monolithic catalyst made from a commercial cordierite structure (square cells, 400 cpsi, wall thickness 0.15 mm), also with a 0.1 mm thick layer of active material, is 0.25. [Pg.391]

Batchwise operating three-phase reactors are frequently used in the production of fine and specialty chemicals, such as ingredients in drags, perfumes and alimentary products. Large-scale chemical industry, on the other hand, is often used with continuous reactors. As we developed a parallel screening system for catalytic three-phase processes, the first decision concerned the operation mode batchwise or continuous. We decided for a continuous reactor system. Batchwise operated parallel sluny reactors are conunercially available, but it is in many cases difficult to reveal catalyst deactivation from batch experiments. In addition, investigation of the effect of catalyst particle size on the overall activity and product distribution is easier in a continuous device. [Pg.419]

Quantitative analytical treatments of the effects of mass transfer and reaction within a porous structure were apparently first carried out by Thiele (20) in the United States, Dam-kohler (21) in Germany, and Zeldovitch (22) in Russia, all working independently and reporting their results between 1937 and 1939. Since these early publications, a number of different research groups have extended and further developed the analysis. Of particular note are the efforts of Wheeler (23-24), Weisz (25-28), Wicke (29-32), and Aris (33-36). In recent years, several individuals have also extended the treatment to include enzymes immobilized in porous media or within permselective membranes. The important consequence of these analyses is the development of a technique that can be used to analyze quantitatively the factors that determine the effectiveness with which the surface area of a porous catalyst is used. For this purpose we define an effectiveness factor rj for a catalyst particle as... [Pg.438]

Effectiveness factor plot for spherical catalyst particles based on effective diffusivities (first-order reaction). [Pg.450]

Dessalces, G., Kolenda, F., andReymond, J. P., Attrition Evaluation for Catalysts used in Fluidized or Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactors, AIChE Preprints of the First Int. Particle Technol. Forum, II 190, Denver, Colorado (1994)... [Pg.487]

As shown in Figure 15.10, the baseline flux, without 1-hexadecene addition, stabilized to 0.30 lpm/m2 at 473 K with a TMP of 1.4 bar. Similar to previous filtration runs using an activated ultrafine iron catalyst slurry, the duration of the induction period for the catalyst particles and membrane was approximately 48 h TOS. Initially, the appearance of permeate was bright white. With the first dosage... [Pg.283]


See other pages where First catalyst particles is mentioned: [Pg.176]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.163]   


SEARCH



Catalyst particles

© 2024 chempedia.info