Validation field

The laboratory-based assessment of toxicity using bioassays is limited not only by laboratory conditions but also by the type of species used. As a matter of practice, tests are conducted under controlled and standardized conditions of light, temperature, oxygen, pH, etc. so that the precision of the results obtained is reliable and so that control over variables such as volatilization and biodegradability is maintained (USEPA, 2002a,b). 

Most of these studies include field validation or the simulation of communities in mesocosms . There are, however, no clear guidelines to carry out these studies and therefore the possibilities for comparison are limited. In order to validate toxicity test results, some authors (Sanders, 1985 Cairns, 1986, 1988) have recommended the need to develop an appropriate experimental design, and the OECD (1992a) has established a number of principles and recommendations for these assays. According to Sprague (1995), there are two levels of validation procedures with varying degrees of complexity  

Verify the adequacy of the toxicity tests carried out under laboratory conditions. 

Select the study sites together with a control site. 

Check existing information about the site, including physical, chemical and biological data. 

---

In the past few years a variety of workshops and symposia have been held on the subjects of model verification, field validation, field testing, etc. of mathematical models for the fate and transport of chemicals in various environmental media. Following a decade of extensive model development in this area, the emphasis has clearly shifted to answering the questions "How good are these models ", "How well do they represent natural systems ", and "Can they be used for management and regulatory decision-making "... 

The process of field validation and testing of models was presented at the Pellston conference as a systematic analysis of errors (6. In any model calibration, verification or validation effort, the model user is continually faced with the need to analyze and explain differences (i.e., errors, in this discussion) between observed data and model predictions. This requires assessments of the accuracy and validity of observed model input data, parameter values, system representation, and observed output data. Figure 2 schematically compares the model and the natural system with regard to inputs, outputs, and sources of error. Clearly there are possible errors associated with each of the categories noted above, i.e., input, parameters, system representation, output. Differences in each of these categories can have dramatic impacts on the conclusions of the model validation process. 

Gobas FAPC, Pasternak JP, Lien K, Duncan RK (1998) Development and field validation of a multimedia exposure assessment model for waste load allocation in aquatic ecosystems application to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlo-rodibenzo-p-dioxin and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran in the Fraser river watershed. Environ Sci Technol 32(16) 2442-2449... 

Borders RA, Gluck SJ, Sowle WF, et al. 1986. Development and validation of personal monitoring methods for low levels of acrylonitrile in workplace atmosphere II. Thermal desorption and field validation. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 47 158-163. 

McLachlan, M.S., Welsch-Pausch, K. and Tolls, J. (1995) Field validation of a model of the uptake of gaseous SOC in Lolium multiflorum (Rye Grass). Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 1998-2004. 

McClain JS, Oris JT, Burton GA Jr, Lattier D (2003) Laboratory and field validation of multiple molecular biomarkers of contaminant exposure in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Environ Toxicol Chem 22 361-370... 

D. Validation of CFD Simulations for Packed Beds 1. Flow Field Validation... 

Persoone, G. Janssen, C.R. Field validation of predictions based on laboratory toxicity tests. In Freshwater Field Tests for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals Hill, I.A., Helmbach, F., Leeuwangh, P., Matthiessen, P., Eds. CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, EL, 1994 379-397. 

There is no general expression for the relaxation rate in the presence of a nonzero transversal field valid for all values of the relevant parameters [53], but Garanin et al. have derived a low-temperature formula valid for weak transversal fields [38], which can be used to determine the coefficient cx ... 

Once the desorption efficiency is determined, the effects of other factors can be examined by laboratory experimentation and field validation. 

In the second publication (Bombardier and Blaise, 2000), laboratory toxicity data derived from two larger projects conducted on freshwater sediments were integrated in the SED-TOX index and it was field validated using four benthic community metrics (species richness, number of taxa in the orders Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera, the Shannon-Wiener diversity index, and the ICI-SL which is a version of the Invertebrate Community Index modified for the St. Lawrence River). 

Knacker T, van Gestel CAM, Jones SE, Soares AMVM, SchallnaB H-J, Forster B, Edwards CA. 2004. Ring-testing and field-validation of a terrestrial model ecosystem (TME) an instrument for testing potentially harmful substances conceptual approach and study design. Ecotoxicol 13 9-27. 

Force field validation. In addition to ensuring that the force field reproduces results of QC calculations we have compared predictions of MD simulations using this force field with the available experimental data. Gas phase MD simulations using the quantum-chemistry based force field accurately reproduced the gas phase structure of DMNA as determined from electron diffraction studies. Liquid phase MD simulations of DMNA predicted the densities and solubility parameter as well as the activation energy and correlation times associated with molecular reorientation that are in good agreement with experimental data [34], As we will show in Section 4, comparison to structural and thermal data for the three pure crystalline polymorphs of HMX support the overall validity of our formulation and parameterization. 

Finley B, Fehling K, Falerios M, et al. 1993. Field validation for sampling and analysis of airborne hexavalent chromium. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 8(3) 191-200. 

Errors can be introduced through experimental design or the procedures used for measurement and sampling. Such errors can be reduced by adherence to good laboratory practices and adherence to established experimental protocols. Errors also can be introduced during simulation model development. Uncertainty in the development and use of models can be reduced through sensitivity analyses, comparison with similar models, and field validation. 

Roig B., Gonzalez C., Berho C., el al., 2006a. Project SWIFT-WFD Deliverable 44, Report of laboratory and field validations of screening tools in terms of performance criteria Recommendations for their further applications in water monitoring. Public report available at http //ww w. swift-wfd. com... 

Field validation in which the correlation between toxicity tests results and quality measurements in the receiving community is established. The degree of correlation is established by comparison of the results and therefore can be... 

Scientific field validation, in which strict scientific methods based on formal experiments are used to establish whether toxicity tests do in fact predict the effects of the toxicants on the community. Previously defined acceptability criteria are applied and, consequently, it is possible to establish the level of agreement between laboratory and field results. Under this type of validation it is important to follow a series of steps that can be performed one by one or, in some cases, simultaneously. 

Cairns Jr., J. (1988) What constitutes field validation of predictions based on laboratory evidence In Aquatic Toxicology andHazardAssessment, Adams, W.J., Chapman, G.A. and Landis, W.G. (eds), ASTM STP 971, pp. 361-368. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. 

Sanders, W.M. (1985) Field validation. In Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology Methods and Applications, Rand, G.M. and Petrocelli, S.E. (eds), pp. 601-618. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, DC. 

Gavi, E., Marchisio, D. L., Barresi, A. A., Olsen, M. G. Fox, R. O. 2010 Turbulent precipitation in micromixers CFD simulation and flow field validation. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 99, 1182-1193. 

ANDERSON Field Validation of Ground Water Models... 

---