Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Direct reaction field validation

In view of the approximations inherent in the derivation of the reaction field theory, it is not surprising that some instances are known in which a non-linear relationship exists between the solvent shift and dielectric constant in polar solvents. As pointed out by Buckingham, the reaction field model is only valid for a solute that reacts in no way with the solvent or with other solute molecules but simply presents a continuum of certain dielectric properties. Protons are normally on the surface of the molecule and are therefore exposed to direct contact with the surrounding molecules, so that the Onsager model is a poor approximation of the actual reaction field acting on a molecule. [Pg.92]

This reduction in the dipole moment of the transition state suggests the presence of CTTS, which is directed from the olefin to the thiyl radical (pcr)- This direction of is the same as that assumed by the substituent effects described in the previous sections. This conclusion was confirmed by Fong et al. by a plot of the values obtained by us against Taft s empirical solvent parameter [53]. Recently, Abe also used our rate parameters to confirm the validity of his new solvent parameters which are derived based on reaction field theory, from which information about the dipole moment and polarizability change with the reaction can be obtained [54],... [Pg.219]

The dynamical problem that we have to deal with here is much more complicated. We ignored the frequency dependence in in Eq. (9.14), but the solution is equally valid if we do take it into account. The equation can then be used to investigate what happens when the dipole itself becomes time-dependent, or suddenly changes in magnitude and direction. It is not just the energy due to the reaction field that plays a role in the dynamics we also need to consider the force or torque on the dipole if we want to change its magnitude or direction. In this case, we are not so much... [Pg.227]

This chapter has outlined specifically how quantitative data on somewhat idealized reaction systems can be used as a basis for demonstrating the validity of our empirical electronic models in the field of reactivity. The multiparameter statistical models derived for the systems studied (PA, acidity, etc.) have limited direct application in EROS themselves. The next section develops the theme of applying the models in a much more general way, leading up to general reactivity prediction in EROS itself. [Pg.59]

What has been presented above is a very elementary account of corrosion under super-ideal conditions. In a few cases, it does give a fairly good agreement with the observed rates of corrosion. Yet, in real systems, corrosion is nearly always too complex a phenomenon for the above simple treatment to be directly applicable. The simple version would be valid if there were no oxide films, if there were a negligible IR drop in the solution, if the corrosion potential dhigh-field approximations [cf. Eq. (12.28)] could be applied, and if the transfer coefficients of the metal-dissolution and electronation reactions were [cf. Eq. (12.25)]. However, the point of an introductory treatment is not to treat the details and the complex realities, but to present the idealized essence about an electrochemical mechanism that has substantial effects in the everyday world. [Pg.145]

The coefficient a in eqn. (27) is between 0.8 and 1.4 in most cases. For A2 reactions, a linear relationship between log k and H0 is not expected, but k is supposed to be directly proportional to the stoichiometric concentration of the strong acid [84]. The Zucker—Hammett hypothesis has been applied most successfully to the field of ester hydrolysis. It is not generally valid, however [13]. [Pg.19]

The linear response function [3], R(r, r ) = (hp(r)/hv(r ))N, is used to study the effect of varying v(r) at constant N. If the system is acted upon by a weak electric field, polarizability (a) may be used as a measure of the corresponding response. A minimum polarizability principle [17] may be stated as, the natural direction of evolution of any system is towards a state of minimum polarizability. Another important principle is that of maximum entropy [18] which states that, the most probable distribution is associated with the maximum value of the Shannon entropy of the information theory. Attempts have been made to provide formal proofs of these principles [19-21], The application of these concepts and related principles vis-a-vis their validity has been studied in the contexts of molecular vibrations and internal rotations [22], chemical reactions [23], hydrogen bonded complexes [24], electronic excitations [25], ion-atom collision [26], atom-field interaction [27], chaotic ionization [28], conservation of orbital symmetry [29], atomic shell structure [30], solvent effects [31], confined systems [32], electric field effects [33], and toxicity [34], In the present chapter, will restrict ourselves to mostly the work done by us. For an elegant review which showcases the contributions from active researchers in the field, see [4], Atomic units are used throughout this chapter unless otherwise specified. [Pg.270]

A pilot plant scale, tubular (annular configuration) photoreactor for the direct photolysis of 2,4-D was modeled (Martin etal, 1997). A tubular germicidal lamp was placed at the reactor centerline. This reactor can be used to test, with a very different reactor geometry, the kinetic expression previously developed in the cylindrical, batch laboratory reactor irradiated from its bottom and to validate the annular reactor modeling for the 2,4-D photolysis. Note that the radiation distribution and consequently the field of reaction rates in one and the other system are very different. [Pg.144]


See other pages where Direct reaction field validation is mentioned: [Pg.335]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.820]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.1042]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.1048]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.19]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.67 , Pg.74 , Pg.92 ]




SEARCH



Direct field

Direct reaction field

Direct reactions

Directed reactions

Direction field

Directional field

Field validation

Reaction direct reactions

Reaction direction

Reaction field

© 2024 chempedia.info