Models field validation

The models you use to portray failures that lead to accidents, and the models you use to propagate their effects, are attempts to approximate reality. Models of accident sequences (although mathematically rigorous) cannot be demonstrated to be exact because you can never precisely identify all of the factors that contribute to an accident of interest. Likewise, most consequence models are at best correlations derived from limited experimental evidence. Even if the models are validated through field experiments for some specific situations, you can never validate them for all possibilities, and the question of model appropriateness will always exist. 

For applications in the field of micro reaction engineering, the conclusion may be drawn that the Navier-Stokes equation and other continuum models are valid in many cases, as Knudsen numbers greater than 10 are rarely obtained. However, it might be necessary to use slip boimdaty conditions. The first theoretical investigations on slip flow of gases were carried out in the 19th century by Maxwell and von Smoluchowski. The basic concept relies on a so-called slip length L, which relates the local shear strain to the relative flow velocity at the wall ... 

In the past few years a variety of workshops and symposia have been held on the subjects of model verification, field validation, field testing, etc. of mathematical models for the fate and transport of chemicals in various environmental media. Following a decade of extensive model development in this area, the emphasis has clearly shifted to answering the questions "How good are these models ", "How well do they represent natural systems ", and "Can they be used for management and regulatory decision-making "... 

The process of field validation and testing of models was presented at the Pellston conference as a systematic analysis of errors (6. In any model calibration, verification or validation effort, the model user is continually faced with the need to analyze and explain differences (i.e., errors, in this discussion) between observed data and model predictions. This requires assessments of the accuracy and validity of observed model input data, parameter values, system representation, and observed output data. Figure 2 schematically compares the model and the natural system with regard to inputs, outputs, and sources of error. Clearly there are possible errors associated with each of the categories noted above, i.e., input, parameters, system representation, output. Differences in each of these categories can have dramatic impacts on the conclusions of the model validation process. 

Gobas FAPC, Pasternak JP, Lien K, Duncan RK (1998) Development and field validation of a multimedia exposure assessment model for waste load allocation in aquatic ecosystems application to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlo-rodibenzo-p-dioxin and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran in the Fraser river watershed. Environ Sci Technol 32(16) 2442-2449... 

Previously derived results for the charge-density profile and polarization profile in this model solution, valid only for small fields, were used. Although these did not consider the penetration of the electrons into the solution, the change in the field is small. A Harrison-type pseudopotential84 was used to represent the effect of core electrons of the solution species on the metal electrons. 

McLachlan, M.S., Welsch-Pausch, K. and Tolls, J. (1995) Field validation of a model of the uptake of gaseous SOC in Lolium multiflorum (Rye Grass). Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 1998-2004. 

Atmospheric Dispersion Models Atmospheric dispersion models generally fall into the categories discussed below. Regardless of the modeling approach, models should be verified that the appropriate physical phenomena are being modeled and validated by comparison with relevant data (at field and laboratory scale). The choice of modeling techniques may be influenced by the expected distance to the level of concern. 

Two main aspects of the HDW approach are important for the present discussion. One aspect is that the model is valid only in the absence of orbital angular momentum contributions to the system, so that its use has been broadly restricted to (say) binuclear complexes of iron(LLl), octahedral nickel(II), or distorted octahedral copper(II). The other aspect concerns the fact that the parameter is a global parameter of the system sequestering many contributions from various ligands and orbitals and, in this respect, may be compared with how Dq in ligand-field theory represents the net effect of electrostatic and covalent (o and rr) effects in the tjg — eg orbital splitting. Attempts to localize our conception of the exchange phenomenon have been made by various... 

Results from a quasi steady-state model (QSSM) valid for long crystals and a constant melt level (if some form of automatic replenishment of melt to the crucible exists) verified the correlation (equation 39) for the dependence of the radius on the growth rate (144) and predicted changes in the radius, the shape of the melt-crystal interface (which is a measure of radial temperature gradients in the crystal), and the axial temperature field with important control parameters like the heater temperature and the level of melt in the crucible. Processing strategies for holding the radius and solid-... 

Further, the validation of a model needs the definition of the criterion for establishing that a model has been validated. How well should a model predict effects precisely, and what are the bounds between which one calls a model (sufficiently) valid It also needs the definition of the context against which a model is to be considered valid. For example, validation of the SSD model has generally been based on whether the so-called hazardous concentration for 5% of the species (HC5) is a concentration that is conservative (sufficiently protective) compared to the no-effect concentration in multispecies mesocosm or field tests. In that sense, the model has performed well for both aquatic and terrestrial systems (e.g., Emans et al. 1993 Okkerman et al. 1993 Posthuma et al. 1998 Versteeg et al. 1999 van den Brink... 

Knacker T, van Gestel CAM, Jones SE, Soares AMVM, SchallnaB H-J, Forster B, Edwards CA. 2004. Ring-testing and field-validation of a terrestrial model ecosystem (TME) an instrument for testing potentially harmful substances conceptual approach and study design. Ecotoxicol 13 9-27. 

The calculation of crystal field parameters from B" from a microscopic theory is very difficult and had limited success. For rare earth compounds a good deal of work and a semi-empirical understanding of the crystal field parameters have been achieved. Even here there are no successful ab initio calculations. It is surprising that the point charge model is valid in some rare earth compounds. 

Errors can be introduced through experimental design or the procedures used for measurement and sampling. Such errors can be reduced by adherence to good laboratory practices and adherence to established experimental protocols. Errors also can be introduced during simulation model development. Uncertainty in the development and use of models can be reduced through sensitivity analyses, comparison with similar models, and field validation. 

Since —ih2d/dQa is decoupled from the rest of the Floquet Hamiltonian, it acts trivially and can be omitted. This effective model is valid only if two different frequencies are assumed. The derivative term represents the relative number of photon pairs, one otj photon minus one 002 photon. Thus the absorption of one effective photon of frequency 8 in the effective model (312) corresponds in the complete model (304) to the absorption of one photon of frequency G>i and the emission of one photon of frequency 002- If the two laser fields are counterpropagating, perpendicularly to the atomic beam, this double photon exchange results in a net transfer of momentum to the atom of + 0)2)/ c which manifests as a deflection of the beam. 

ANDERSON Field Validation of Ground Water Models... 

Examples of model calibration are cited in (11) and (12) and an example of an attempt to field validate a model is discussed in (13). An example of a two-dimensional model application for a case in which the field data were insufficent for calculating reliable vertical averages and were also insufficient for defining the areal extent of the plume, is presented below. 

---