Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Feed conversion, predicted

The dehydrogenation of ethane (A) to ethene (B) is conducted in a 0.5-m3 PFR. The reaction is first-order with respect to A, with a rate constant of 15.2 min-1 at 725°C. The feed contains pure ethane at 725°C, 400 kPa, and a flow rate of 1. 0 kmol min-1. Compare the conversion predicted if isothermal, isobaric conditions are assumed with that if the pressure drop is accounted for with isothermal flow. The diameter of the reactor tube is 0.076 m, and the viscosity of the gas is 2.5 X 10-5 Pa s. [Pg.379]

As can be seen, the pyrolysis model consists of two parts—a kinetic-feed decomposition model (Equation 10) and an analytic-yield prediction model (Equation 9). The model parameters are the product stoichiometries, S , and the decomposition rate constant, k. In addition, estimation of the decomposition rate constant requires a knowledge of the feed conversion, X. [Pg.144]

Figure 4. Predicted vs. actual feed conversion. Feed (O n-heptane, ( ) i-pentane, (A) cyclohexane (open symbols are literature data). Figure 4. Predicted vs. actual feed conversion. Feed (O n-heptane, ( ) i-pentane, (A) cyclohexane (open symbols are literature data).
FIGURE 3.11 Proliie of rate of methane disappearance dependence upon steam feed partial pressure and the corresponding exit methane conversion predicted by a one-dimensional heterogeneous model, operating conditions are given as follows tube length/O.D./LD. 11.95/ 0.102/0.0795 m feed composition for point a (mol%) 12.98,... [Pg.52]

The Need for Increased Surveillance of the Exposure of Man to lonophores. From the lipid soluhllity of monensln and other lonophores, we would predict they should have no trouble equilibrating across biological membrane systems including the gut. This Is certainly the case for the two diverse species observed, the dog, a carnivore, and the rabbit, a herbivore. Accordingly, we infer that there Is ample opportunity for monensln and other carboxylic lonophores administered orally to livestock to distribute systemically and exert a pharmacological effect on the recipient animal. Furthermore, the resultant physiological effects may be part of the mechanism by which lonophores produce their Improved feed conversion efficiency. [Pg.19]

Based on the excellent results of pond trials in 1991, aU US shrimp ponds were stocked with High Health PL in 1992. Total production of the US industry doubled as a direct result of this innovation. Use of High Health shrimp in commercial farms increased production and survival, improved feed conversion ratio (FCR) and narrowed harvest size distribution all of which contributed to increased profitability. In addition to increased production, use of High Health shrimp reduced incidence of shrimp disease. It was predicted that the shrimp farming problems that were solved by use of SPF shrimp in the US industry could be duplicated elsewhere (Wyban et al., 1992). [Pg.332]

The three-way converter. Since the concentration of NO is very small, the heat generated by the reduction reaction is expected to have a minor effect on temperature and conversion predictions (Chen et al. (1988)). Owing to the absence of accurate data on NO, reduction kinetics, a preliminary approach to three-way catalytic converters consists of simulating only oxidation reactions under stoichiometric conditions. The standard parameters used in the simulations are given in Table 6 except that the feed mole fraction of O2 and N2 are now 0.01225... [Pg.570]

Parameter Estimation Relational and physical models require adjustable parameters to match the predicted output (e.g., distillate composition, tower profiles, and reactor conversions) to the operating specifications (e.g., distillation material and energy balance) and the unit input, feed compositions, conditions, and flows. The physical-model adjustable parameters bear a loose tie to theory with the limitations discussed in previous sections. The relational models have no tie to theory or the internal equipment processes. The purpose of this interpretation procedure is to develop estimates for these parameters. It is these parameters hnked with the model that provide a mathematical representation of the unit that can be used in fault detection, control, and design. [Pg.2573]

The models presented correctly predict blend time and reaction product distribution. The reaction model correctly predicts the effects of scale, impeller speed, and feed location. This shows that such models can provide valuable tools for designing chemical reactors. Process problems may be avoided by using CFM early in the design stage. When designing an industrial chemical reactor it is recommended that the values of the model constants are determined on a laboratory scale. The reaction model constants can then be used to optimize the product conversion on the production scale varying agitator speed and feed position. [Pg.807]

One final point should be made. The observation of significant solvent effects on kp in homopolymerization and on reactivity ratios in copolymerization (Section 8.3.1) calls into question the methods for reactivity ratio measurement which rely on evaluation of the polymer composition for various monomer feed ratios (Section 7.3.2). If solvent effects arc significant, it would seem to follow that reactivity ratios in bulk copolymerization should be a function of the feed composition.138 Moreover, since the reaction medium alters with conversion, the reactivity ratios may also vary with conversion. Thus the two most common sources of data used in reactivity ratio determination (i.e. low conversion composition measurements and composition conversion measurements) are potentially flawed. A corollary of this statement also provides one explanation for any failure of reactivity ratios to predict copolymer composition at high conversion. The effect of solvents on radical copolymerization remains an area in need of further research. [Pg.361]

Transfer constants of the macromonomers arc typically low (-0.5, Section 6.2.3.4) and it is necessary to use starved feed conditions to achieve low dispersities and to make block copolymers. Best results have been achieved using emulsion polymerization380 395 where rates of termination are lowered by compartmentalization effects. A one-pot process where macromonomers were made by catalytic chain transfer was developed.380" 95 Molecular weights up to 28000 that increase linearly with conversion as predicted by eq. 16, dispersities that decrease with conversion down to MJM< 1.3 and block purities >90% can be achieved.311 1 395 Surfactant-frcc emulsion polymerizations were made possible by use of a MAA macromonomer as the initial RAFT agent to create self-stabilizing lattices . [Pg.502]

The inlet monomer concentration was varied sinusoidally to determine the effect of these changes on Dp, the time-averaged polydispersity, when compared with the steady-state case. For the unsteady state CSTR, the pseudo steady-state assumption for active centres was used to simplify computations. In both of the mechanisms considered, D increases with respect to the steady-state value (for constant conversion and number average chain length y ) as the frequency of the oscillation in the monomer feed concentration is decreased. The maximum deviation in D thus occurs as lo 0. However, it was predicted that the value of D could only be increased by 10-325S with respect to the steady state depending on reaction mechanism and the amplitude of the oscillating feed. Laurence and Vasudevan (12) considered a reaction with combination termination and no chain transfer. [Pg.254]

Two different eigperimental runs, with high concentration of styrene and acrylonitrile in the feed, are now examined without any further parameter adjustment, i. e. in a conplete predictive way. In Figures 7 to 10, overall conversion and polymer coiposltion are shown as a function of time, for the following two initial conposition A=H 20 gr, S=60 and S=H=20 gr, A=60 gr. [Pg.393]

When the set-points for M and conversion are changed again at 600 min the controller predictively increases both the feed flow rate and jacket inlet temperature. Conversion decrrases due to the incaease of feed flow rate but the feed flow rate reaches its upper bound very quickly. Therefore, both inputs are decreased and these bring the conversion and My, to their respective set-points through interactive dynamics. When compared with the other... [Pg.864]

The calculated conversions presented in Table VIII used Eq. (57). They are quite remarkable. They reproduce experimental trends of lower conversion and higher peak bed temperature as the S02 content in the feed increases. Bunimovich et al. (1995) compared simulated and experimental conversion and peak bed temperature data for full-scale commercial plants and large-scale pilot plants using the model given in Table IX and the steady-state kinetic model [Eq. (57)]. Although the time-average plant performance was predicted closely, limiting cycle period predicted by the... [Pg.238]

For a single continuous reactor, the model predicted the expected oscillatory behaviour. The oscillations disappeared when a seeded feed stream was used. Figure 5c shows a single CSTR behaviour when different start-up conditions are applied. The solid line corresponds to the reactor starting up full of water. The expected overshoot, when the reactor starts full of the emulsion recipe, is correctly predicted by the model and furthermore the model numerical predictions (conversion — 25%, diameter - 1500 A) are in a reasonable range. [Pg.229]

However, the detailed description of the FT product distribution together with the reactant conversion is a very important task for the industrial practice, being an essential prerequisite for the industrialization of the process. In this work, a detailed kinetic model developed for the FTS over a cobalt-based catalyst is presented that represents an evolution of the model published previously by some of us.10 Such a model has been obtained on the basis of experimental data collected in a fixed bed microreactor under conditions relevant to industrial operations (temperature, 210-235°C pressure, 8-25 bar H2/CO feed molar ratio, 1.8-2.7 gas hourly space velocity, (GHSV) 2,000-7,000 cm3 (STP)/h/gcatalyst), and it is able to predict at the same time both the CO and H2 conversions and the hydrocarbon distribution up to a carbon number of 49. The model does not presently include the formation of alcohols and C02, whose selectivity is very low in the FTS on cobalt-based catalysts. [Pg.295]

A reactor converts an organic compound to product P by heating the material in the presence of an additive A. The additive can be injected into the reactor, and steam can be injected into a heating coil inside the reactor to provide heat. Some conversion can be obtained by heating without addition of A, and vice versa. In order to predict the yield of P, Yp (lb mole product per lb mole feed), as a function of the mole fraction of A, XA, and the steam addition S (in lb/lb mole feed), the following data were obtained. [Pg.79]

Natural gas is reacted with steam on an Ni-based catalyst in a primary reformer to produce syngas at a residence time of several seconds, with an H2 CO ratio of 3 according to reaction (9.1). Reformed gas is obtained at about 930 °C and pressures of 15-30 bar. The CH4 conversion is typically 90-92% and the composition of the primary reformer outlet stream approaches that predicted by thermodynamic equilibrium for a CH4 H20 = 1 3 feed. A secondary autothermal reformer is placed just at the exit of the primary reformer in which the unconverted CH4 is reacted with O2 at the top of a refractory lined tube. The mixture is then equilibrated on an Ni catalyst located below the oxidation zone [21]. The main limit of the SR reaction is thermodynamics, which determines very high conversions only at temperatures above 900 °C. The catalyst activity is important but not decisive, with the heat transfer coefficient of the internal tube wall being the rate-limiting parameter [19, 20]. [Pg.291]

For a given feed (fixed C o, . ) and using conversion of key component as a measure of the composition and extent of reaction, the versus T plot has the general shape shown in Fig. 9.3. This plot can be prepared either from a thermodynamically consistent rate expression for the reaction (the rate must be zero at equilibrium) or by interpolating from a given set of kinetic data in conjunction with thermodynamic information on the equilibrium. Naturally, the reliability of all the calculations and predictions that follow are directly dependent on the accuracy of this chart. Hence, it is imperative to obtain good kinetic data to construct this chart. [Pg.215]

One interesting characteristic of this type of reactor is that the maximum temperature of the products can be above the adiabatic temperature predicted for reactant temperatures before heat exchange. Heat is retained in the reactor by preheating the feed, and temperatures in some situations can be many hundreds of degrees above adiabatic. This can be useful in combustors for pollution abatement where dilute hydrocarbons need to be heated to high temperatures to cause ignition and attain high conversion with short residence times. [Pg.238]


See other pages where Feed conversion, predicted is mentioned: [Pg.67]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.864]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.189]   


SEARCH



Predicting conversions

© 2024 chempedia.info