Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Procedural interpretation

Importantly, when interpreting the results obtained from a metabolic model, we always have to take into account the source and thus the reliability of the data that were used to parameterize these models. In the usual case that tissues and compartments are mixed in the sampling procedures, interpretation has to be limited to phenomena that are not influenced by the averaging effect. [Pg.148]

Although the immunofluorescence assay is a relatively simple procedure, interpretation is subjective and requires experience. The laboratory must also have the ability to grow HIV in cell culture. [Pg.222]

A textbook and standard reference designed to provide a thorough introduction to toxicology in the broadest sense. Strengths include coverage of methods, techniques, procedures, interpretation of data, and examination of controversial areas. [Pg.1421]

Test Type Cell Line or Animal Procedure Interpretation of Results... [Pg.343]

Horn-clause logic is known to be Turing-complete, that is, it provides a universal computing formalism. Horn clauses are closely related to conventional programming languages since they can be given a simple procedural interpretation. [Pg.226]

Procedural interpretation. Get the list of colors (called X), add black in front of it ([black x]), and sort this list. The sorted list is retmned as z. [Pg.227]

Since Horn clauses have a procedural interpretation, such a DCG implemented in Prolog yields a parser for the language described by the grammar. Since Prolog procedures are called in a depth-first fashion, such a parser is a recursive-descent, top-down parser. [Pg.236]

The control flow, deflned by a procedural interpretation of the initial Silage description of figure 1, results in an inefficient solution. Indeed, the inner loop of the double nested loop construct is the fastest one executed. This type of control flow definition corresponds to a column-wise ordering of b [] [] and r [] [] instance computations. In terms of storage requirements, this means that all 562 input signal instances of s [] are read in before they are consumed. The same is true for all 50 instances of r [0] [], which are produced before one instance is consumed. Furthermore, P intermediate signals r [] [] have to be alive in parallel. The same is true for the column of return[] values. [Pg.154]

ASTM G 32, Method for Vibratory Cavitation Erosion Test— This standard presents a test method for determining the susceptibility of an alloy in an electrolyte to cavitation damage using high-frequency vibration. In general, the rate of erosion is determined by weight loss of the specimen. The method contains terminology definitions, a description of the apparatus, test specimen dimensions and preparation, test conditions, test procedures, interpretation of residts, and report considerations. [Pg.179]

Spectrum interpretation is a two-track procedure (INTERPRET, Figure 9). On one track, the molecular formula and the collective spectral properties of the unknown are processed by PRUNE to give rise to the ACF shortlist, a subset of the exhaustive set of the uniformly sized, explicitly defined basic units of structure. PRUNE is modular in nature and tests each ACF in the exhaustive list for compatibility with the molecular formula and the observed spectral data. 2D NMR data, if entered, are also used in pruning. PRUNE also includes a self-consistency routine to eliminate structural contradictions among the ACFs of the shortlist. Since PRUNE is biased to retain an invalid ACF rather than risk deleting a valid ACF, it is common for an ACF shortlist to contain more invalid than valid fragments (see Section 4.3). The ACF shortlist can, but need not, be edited by the user. [Pg.2806]

Increasing mechanisation and automatisation of non-destructive inspection procedures lead to an increasing amount of data that is acquired in a short amount of time. This in turn creates a need for reliable automatic or automated data interpretation techniques. [Pg.97]

Using flaw visuahzation system data the strength and fracture mechanics estimations are carried out in accordance with defect assessment regulatory procedure M-02-91 [5]. Recently, the additions had been included in the procedure, concerning interpretation of expert flaw visualization sysf em data, computer modelling, residual stresses, in-site properties of metal, methods of fracture analysis. [Pg.196]

As a first step in the direction outlined here some manufacturers and BAM last year discussed the problems and the possible procedures of such a system of quality assurance. As a result of this meeting round robin tests for the harmonization of the measurements of film system parameters and a possible procedure of surveillance of the quality of film systems were proposed. Closely related to these the BAM offers to perform the classification of film systems. But as during the production of films variations of the properties of the different batches cannot be avoided, the results of measurements of films of a single batch will be restricted to this charge, while only the measurements and mean of several batches of a film type will give representative values of its properties. This fact is taken into account already in section 4 of the standard EN 584-1 which can be interpreted as a kind of continuous surveillance. In accordance with this standard a film system caimot be certified on the base of measurements of a single emulsion only. [Pg.553]

Procedure. Run one or more simultaneous equation programs to determine the C—C and C—H bond energies and interpret the results. The error veetor is the veetor of ealeulated values minus the veetor of bond enthalpies taken as tme from an aeeepted source. Caleulate the enor veetor using a standard souree of bond enthalpies (e.g., Laidler and Meiser, 1999 or Atkins, 1994). Expand the method for 2-butene (2-butene) = —11 kJ mol ] and so obtain the C—H, C—C,... [Pg.56]

In this formulation, the electron density is expressed as a linear combination of basis functions similar in mathematical form to HF orbitals. A determinant is then formed from these functions, called Kohn-Sham orbitals. It is the electron density from this determinant of orbitals that is used to compute the energy. This procedure is necessary because Fermion systems can only have electron densities that arise from an antisymmetric wave function. There has been some debate over the interpretation of Kohn-Sham orbitals. It is certain that they are not mathematically equivalent to either HF orbitals or natural orbitals from correlated calculations. However, Kohn-Sham orbitals do describe the behavior of electrons in a molecule, just as the other orbitals mentioned do. DFT orbital eigenvalues do not match the energies obtained from photoelectron spectroscopy experiments as well as HF orbital energies do. The questions still being debated are how to assign similarities and how to physically interpret the differences. [Pg.42]

An analytical procedure is often tested on materials of known composition. These materials may be pure substances, standard samples, or materials analyzed by some other more accurate method. Repeated determinations on a known material furnish data for both an estimate of the precision and a test for the presence of a constant error in the results. The standard deviation is found from Equation 12 (with the known composition replacing /x). A calculated value for t (Eq. 14) in excess of the appropriate value in Table 2.27 is interpreted as evidence of the presence of a constant error at the indicated level of significance. [Pg.198]

It would be difficult to over-estimate the extent to which the BET method has contributed to the development of those branches of physical chemistry such as heterogeneous catalysis, adsorption or particle size estimation, which involve finely divided or porous solids in all of these fields the BET surface area is a household phrase. But it is perhaps the very breadth of its scope which has led to a somewhat uncritical application of the method as a kind of infallible yardstick, and to a lack of appreciation of the nature of its basic assumptions or of the circumstances under which it may, or may not, be expected to yield a reliable result. This is particularly true of those solids which contain very fine pores and give rise to Langmuir-type isotherms, for the BET procedure may then give quite erroneous values for the surface area. If the pores are rather larger—tens to hundreds of Angstroms in width—the pore size distribution may be calculated from the adsorption isotherm of a vapour with the aid of the Kelvin equation, and within recent years a number of detailed procedures for carrying out the calculation have been put forward but all too often the limitations on the validity of the results, and the difficulty of interpretation in terms of the actual solid, tend to be insufficiently stressed or even entirely overlooked. And in the time-honoured method for the estimation of surface area from measurements of adsorption from solution, the complications introduced by... [Pg.292]

The procedure followed in collecting and analyzing samples and in interpreting the results of an analysis. [Pg.707]

Our objectives in this section are twofold to describe and analyze a mechanical model for a viscoelastic material, and to describe and interpret an experimental procedure used to study polymer samples. We shall begin with the model and then proceed to relate the two. Pay attention to the difference between the model and the actual observed behavior. [Pg.158]

The standard procedure is to measure D at several different initial concentrations, using the procedure just described, and then extrapolating the results to c = 0. We symbolize the resulting limiting value D°. This value can be interpreted in terms of Eq. (9.79), which is derived by assuming 7 -> 1 and therefore requires extreme dilution. It is apparent from Eqs. (9.79) and (9.5) that D° depends on the ratio T/770, as well as on the properties of the solute itself. In order to reduce experimental (subscript ex) values of D° to some standard condition (subscript s), it is conventional to write... [Pg.634]

This chapter is the narrowest in scope of any chapter in this book. In it we discuss a single experimental procedure and its interpretation. It is appropriate to examine light scattering in considerable detail, since the theory underlying this method is relatively unfamiliar to students and the interpretation yields information concerning a variety of polymer parameters. [Pg.659]

The GeneralNlotices. These are the basic requirements for the appheation and interpretation of the tests and specifications that foUow in the USP-NF. Many of the terms used in the text are defined, and the majority of procedural questions that may arise within the monograph for each substance are answered. [Pg.445]

Three basic approaches have been used to solve the equations of motion. For relatively simple configurations, direct solution is possible. For complex configurations, numerical methods can be employed. For many practical situations, particularly three-dimensional or one-of-a-kind configurations, scale modeling is employed and the results are interpreted in terms of dimensionless groups. This section outlines the procedures employed and the limitations of these approaches (see Computer-aided engineering (CAE)). [Pg.100]

Hazard analysis does have limitations. First, there can never be a guarantee that the method has identified all of the hazards, accident scenarios, and consequences. Second, the method is very sensitive to the assumptions made by the analysts prior to beginning the procedure. A different set of analysts might well lead to a different result. Third, the procedure is sensitive to the experience of the participants. Finally, the results are sometimes difficult to interpret and manage. [Pg.470]


See other pages where Procedural interpretation is mentioned: [Pg.267]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.1871]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.1871]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.1059]    [Pg.1638]    [Pg.1689]    [Pg.1769]    [Pg.726]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.526]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.151 ]




SEARCH



Experimental Procedures and Interpretation

Interpretation procedural steps

Skill 1.4 Understanding procedures for collecting and interpreting data to minimize bias

Standard Interpretation Procedure

© 2024 chempedia.info