Factor classification

Suffix -mostim is used for macrophage colony-stiumulating foactors (M-CSF) Suffix -plestim is used for interleukin 3 (IL 3 factors classifed as pleiotropic colony-stimulating factors... 

The sense of smell can sometimes be of use in ascertaining that the TLV of a hazardous substance has been exceeded before it is too late. J.E. Amoore and E. Hautala (Journal of Applied ToxicologyS, No. 6 (1983) 272ff) have developed an Odor Safety Factor classification with five categories the have also compiled a list of mean odor limits for 214 volatile substances based on various sources. These limits indicate the atmospheric concentration at which 50% of the test subjects, having been given prior warning, were just able to identify the odor. 

The interactions between rates and efficiencies are complex, involving homeostatic mechanisms that influence an insect s behavior, physiology, growth and reproduction. These interactions are influenced by starvation, induction of preference, nutrients, allelochemics and various environmental (climatic) factors. Classification of a chemical as a repellent, deterrent, feeding suppressant, toxin or digestibility-reducer may be situation-dependent, dose-dependent, and involve chemicals, behavioral and physiological feedback systems (Blau et al., 1978 Duffey, 1977,1980 Reese, 1979 Grabstein and Scriber, 1981). 

Health and Safety Factors. Sulfur hexafluoride is a nonflammable, relatively unreactive gas that has been described as physiologically inert (54). The current OSHA standard maximum allowable concentration for human exposure in air is 6000 mg/m (1000 ppm) TWA (55). The Underwriters Laboratories classification is Toxicity Group VI. It should be noted, however, that breakdown products of SF, produced by electrical decomposition of the gas, are toxic. If SF is exposed to electrical arcing, provision should be made to absorb the toxic components by passing the gas over activated alumina, soda-lime, or molecular sieves (qv) (56). 

Health and Safety Factors (Toxicology). No special precautions are necessary in the handling of malonic acid beyond normal safe handling measures. Due to its acidity malonic acid is classified as a mild irritant (skin irritation, rabbits). The LD q value (oral, rats) for malonic acid is 2750 mg/kg. Transport classification RID/ADR, IMDG-Code, lATA/lCAO not restricted. 

Health and Safety Factors. Dimethyl malonate and diethyl malonate do not present any specific danger of health ha2ard if handled with the usual precautions. Nevertheless, inhalation and skin contact should be avoided. Dimethyl malonate has a LD q (oral, rats) of 4520 mg/kg and is classified as nonirritant (skin irritation, rabbits). Diethyl malonate has an LD q (oral, rats) greater than 5000 mg/kg and is also classified as nonirritant (skin irritation, rabbits). Transport classification for both esters is RID/ADR 3, IMDH-Code, lATA-ICAO not restricted. 

Health and Safety Factors. Handling of cyanoacetic acid and cyanoacetates do not present any specific danger or health hazard if handled with the usual precautions. Cyanoacetic acid is classified as a moderate irritant (skin irritation, rabbits) and has an LD q (oral, rats) of 1500 mg/kg. Methyl and ethyl cyanoacetate are both classified as slight irritants (skin irritation, rabbits) and have an LD q (oral, rats) of 3062 and 2820 mg/kg, respectively. Transport classification cyanoacetic acid RID/ADR 8 IMDG-Code 8 lATA/ICAO 6.1. Methyl and ethyl cyanoacetate RID/ADR 6.1 IMDG-Code 6.1 lATA/ICAO 6.1. 

Health and Safety Factors. Malononitrile is usually available as a soHdifted melt in plastic-Hned dmms. Remelting has to be done carefully because spontaneous decomposition can occur at elevated temperatures, particularly above 100°C, in the presence of impurities such as alkaHes, ammonium, and 2inc salts. Melting should be carried out by means of a water bath and only shordy before use. Occupational exposure to malononitrile mainly occurs by inhalation of vapors and absorption through the skin. Malononitrile has a recommended workplace exposure limit of 8 mg/m, an LD q (oral, rats) of 13.9 mg/kg, and is classified as slight irritant (skin irritation, rabbits). Transport classification RID/ADR 61, IMDG-Code 6.1, lATA/ICAO 6.1. 

There are three generally recognized classifications for sulfur vulcanization conventional, efficient (EV) cures, and semiefficient (semi-EV) cures. These differ primarily ki the type of sulfur cross-links that form, which ki turn significantly influences the vulcanizate properties (Eig. 8) (21). The term efficient refers to the number of sulfur atoms per cross-link an efficiency factor (E) has been proposed (20). 

Thus the factors vaiy with the type of processing, although the boundaries between the classifications are not clear-cut and considerable judgment is required in selection of the correct factor. 

These methods of classification are not mutually exclusive. Thus filters usually are divided first into the two groups of cake and clarifying equipment, then into groups of machines using the same land of driving force, then further into batch and continuous classes. This is the scheme of classification underlying the discussion of filters of this subsection. Within it, the other aspects of operating cycle, the nature of the sohds, and additional factors (e.g., types and classification of filter media) will be treated explicitly or implicitly. 

Comparisons (49) of measured concentrations of SFg tracer released from a 36-m stack, and those estimated by the PTMPT model for 133 data pairs over PasquiU stabilities varying from B through F, had a linear correlation coefficient of 0.81. Here 89% of the estimated values were within a factor of 3 of the measured concentrations. The calculations were most sensitive to the selection of stability class. Changing the stability classification by one varies the concentration by a factor of 2 to 4. 

The selection of the motor enclosure type involves not only economics but also assessment of two factors area hazard classification and other area operation conditions. 

Where any area is classified under more than one factor, the higher classification should prevail. 

Classification of accidents by safety function is the starting point for classification by mitigating system. Because of the factors listed below, classification by system usually produces more accident... 

TABLE 3.2 A Classification Structure of Performance Influencing Factors ... 

Management policies have an all pervasive effect on the activities of individuals at every level in the organization. The safety-related factors at the management level which have been considered in the organizational systems perspective in Chapter 2, will be summarized here to complete the general classification scheme of PIFs. 

Another way of classifying the various TA methods is in terms of the application areas in which they might be seen as most useful. Figure 4.15 provides such a classification in terms of seven human factors applications, namely ... 

---