Exposure estimates reliability

NOAEL (no-observed-adverse-effect level) is defined as the highest dose at which no adverse effects are observed in the most susceptible animal species. The NOAEL is used as a basis for setting human safety standards for acceptable daily intakes (ADIs), taking into account uncertainty factors for extrapolation from animals to humans and inter-individual variabilities of humans. The adequacy of any margin of safety or margin of exposure must consider the nature and quality of the available hazard identification and dose-response data and the reliability and relevance of the exposure estimations. In some cases, no adverse endpoint can be identified such as for many naturally occurring compounds that are widespread in foods. In that case, an ADI Not Specified is assigned. ... 

Immunotoxicology data most often available for use in risk assessment is derived from experimental animal studies. Although animal models provide an opportunity to establish more reliable exposure estimates and conduct more informative tests than human studies, the level of accuracy that can be achieved using such data in extrapolating to humans is often a matter of debate. In immunotoxicology testing, a set of tests usually referred to... 

Exposure estimates should be developed by collecting all necessary information (including that obtained from analogous situations or from models), evaluating the information (in terms of its quality, reliability, etc.), thus enabling reasoned estimates of exposure to be derived. These estimates should preferably be supported by a description of any uncertainties relevant to the estimate. 

Studies of the inhalation toxicity of cresols have not been adequately detailed. The exposures involved mixtures of vapors and aerosols that were not characterized sufficiently to estimate exposure levels reliably. Furthermore, methods for evaluating the toxicological end points were not adequately described. Therefore, no LSE table or figure containing levels of significant exposure was constructed for this route. Nevertheless, certain general conclusions can be drawn from the reports regarding the toxic potential of inhaled cresols. These are discussed below. 

Nowadays, highly sophisticated modelling approaches are available, which allow assessing PM at high spatial and temporal resolution, as needed for human exposure estimation. Thus no new models need to be developed (models predicting transport and transformation of aerosols in the atmosphere are available). Instead, methods need to be devised which are able to reduce uncertainty of modelled outputs. The respective results made available for a certain use allows understanding if answers to specific user questions can or cannot be supplied reliably. 

As shown along this chapter, a reliable air quality model is a valuable tool for human exposure studies, once modelled concentrations at different spatial scales and time resolutions allow to better characterising the air quality at the microenvironments visited by a target population, rather than monitoring values that are site and time specific. Moreover, air quality and exposure modelling approach considers the contribution of indoor environments, where people spend most of their time, to the exposure estimation. 

These factors typically converge as a sum of products or quotients to define a distribution of population exposure or a range of individual exposures. The reliability of population exposure estimates will depend strongly on the quantity and accuracy of the obtainable data associated with these five links. 

Validation is the process by which the reliability and relevance of a particular approach, method or assessment are established for a defined purpose (IPCS, 2004). Uncertainty analysis can contribute to this, by indicating the reliability of the exposure estimate (how different the true exposure might be) and hence its usefulness for decision-making. 

Physical and Chemical Properties. Several important physical properties of 2-butoxyethanol and 2-butoxyethanol acetate have yet to be experimentally determined. These include their octanol-water and soil-water partition coefficients, Henry s law constants, and bioconcentration factors in aquatic organisms. These data are important in estimating the fate of tlie released compounds in the environment and in determining the potential for human exposure. However, reliable estimated values for these parameters are available (ASTER 1995a, 1995b Howard 1993 HSDB 1995 Lyman et al. 1982) and there is no critical need for experimental confirmation of the estimated values. 

Comparison of the ratings of experienced raters with previously recorded industrial hygiene measurements for occupations in Australia Estimation of the levels of exposure misclassification by expert assessment in a study of lung cancer in central and eastern Europe and Liverpool Application of Bayesian framework for retrospective exposure assessment of workers in a nickel smelter Determination of the level of information required by industrial hygienists to develop reliable exposure estimates Explanation of new framework to obtain exposure estimates through the Bayesiem approach Validation of a new method for structured subjective assessment of past concentration... 

Determination of reliable indoor exposure estimates includes considerable uncertainty and reliance on unfounded conjecture [2], Routine exposure estimates have ranged from toxicologically negligible levels to amounts that would produce frank systemic toxicity if they ever occurred. 

Reliable lifetime TDI values cannot be derived, since long-term studies at the appropriate doses and in the appropriate species are not available. Medium-term exposure TDIs for the estimation of risk were estimated (as the chlorides) as 0.0012 mg/kg body weight for monomethyltin and dimethyltin based on neurotoxicity, 0.003 mg/kg body weight for dibutyltin based on immunotoxicity, and 0.002 mg/kg body weight for dioctyltin, also based on immunotoxicity. No reliable TDI could be derived for monobutyltin or monooctyltin. 

Estimates of exposure levels posing minimal risk to humans (Minimal Risk Levels or MRLs) have been made for methyl parathion. An MRL is defined as an estimate of daily human exposure to a substance that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of adverse effects (noncarcinogenic) over a specified duration of exposure. MRLs are derived when reliable and sufficient data exist to identify the target organ(s) of effect or the most sensitive health effect(s) for a specific duration within a given route of exposure. MRLs are based on noncancerous health effects only and do not consider carcinogenic effects. MRLs can be derived for acute, intermediate, and chronic duration exposures for inhalation and oral routes. Appropriate methodology does not exist to develop MRLs for dermal exposure. 

Tables (3-1, 3-2, and 3-3) and figures (3-1 and 3-2) are used to summarize health effects and illustrate graphically levels of exposure associated with those effects. These levels cover health effects observed at increasing dose concentrations and durations, differences in response by species, minimal risk levels (MRLs) to humans for noncancer end points, and EPA s estimated range associated with an upper- bound individual lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 10,000,000. Use the LSE tables and figures for a quick review of the health effects and to locate data for a specific exposure scenario. The LSE tables and figures should always be used in conjunction with the text. All entries in these tables and figures represent studies that provide reliable, quantitative estimates of No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Levels (NOAELs), Lowest-Observed-Adverse-Effect Levels (LOAELs), or Cancer Effect Levels (CELs).

Reliable evaluation of the potential for human exposure to endosulfan depends in part on the reliability of supporting analytical data from environmental samples and biological specimens. In reviewing data on endosulfan levels monitored or estimated in the environment, it should also be noted that the amount of chemical identified analytically is not necessarily equivalent to the amount that is bioavailable. 

As(III), As(V), monomethyl arsonic acid, and dimethylarsenic acid, which gives a quick and reliable estimation of exposure to inorganic arsenic. 

In some cases it is possible to differentiate between the various alkyl substituents. Primary, secondary and tertiary nitrates and nitrites all show clearly different infrared absorptions. The spectra of acid fluorides can be used to differentiate chain-end groups from pendant acid groups. Furthermore, the loss of all -OH species upon sulfur tetrafluoride exposure allows the reliable estimation of ketones, esters and lactones without the complication of hydrogen-bonding induced shifts in the spectra. Preliminary results from the use of these reactions to characterize y-ray oxidized polyethylene and polypropylene are used to illustrate the scope of the methods. 

---