Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Equipment performance

Performance in Colter. The modified monomer should perform well ia commercial deposition equipment. Performance considerations iaclude the growth rate of the coating, the uniformity of thickness of the coating over the chamber volume, and the efficiency with which the dimer is converted to useful coatings on the substrates. [Pg.429]

Thermodynamic principles govern all air conditioning processes (see Heat exchange technology, heat transfer). Of particular importance are specific thermodynamic appHcations both to equipment performance which influences the energy consumption of a system and to the properties of moist air which determine air conditioning capacity. The concentration of moist air defines a system s load. [Pg.352]

Statistical Control. Statistical quahty control (SQC) is the apphcation of statistical techniques to analytical data. Statistical process control (SPC) is the real-time apphcation of statistics to process or equipment performance. Apphed to QC lab instmmentation or methods, SPC can demonstrate the stabihty and precision of the measurement technique. The SQC of lot data can be used to show the stabihty of the production process. Without such evidence of statistical control, the quahty of the lab data is unknown and can result in production challenging adverse test results. Also, without control, measurement bias cannot be determined and the results derived from different labs cannot be compared (27). [Pg.367]

Sedimentation Equipment. Centrifugal sedimentation equipment is usually characterized by limiting flow rates and theoretical settling capabihties. Feed rates in industrial appHcations may be dictated by Hquid handling capacities, separating capacities, or physical characteristics of the soHds. Sedimentation equipment performance is illustrated in Figure 8 on the basis of nominal clarified effluent flow rates and the appHcable values. The... [Pg.405]

Fig. 8. Sedimentation equipment performance where the particles have a A5 value of 1.0 g/cm and a viscosity, p., value of 1 mPa-s(=cP). The value of is twice the settling velocity at G = 1, and Q = overflow discharge rate in measurements given. Fig. 8. Sedimentation equipment performance where the particles have a A5 value of 1.0 g/cm and a viscosity, p., value of 1 mPa-s(=cP). The value of is twice the settling velocity at G = 1, and Q = overflow discharge rate in measurements given.
Collapse of vapor bubbles once they reach zones where the pressure exceeds the vapor pressure can cause objectionable noise and vibration and extensive erosion or pitting of the boundaiy materials. The critical cavitation number at inception of cavitation, denoted <7, is useful in correlating equipment performance data ... [Pg.670]

Even when a total system analysis is unnecessai y, the methodology of mathematical modeling is useful, because by considering each component of a system as a block of a flow sheet, the interrelationships become much clearer. Additional alternatives often become apparent, as does the need for more equipment-performance data. [Pg.1911]

First, any analysis must be coupled with a technically correct interpretation of the equipment performance soundly rooted in the fundamentals of mass, heat, and momentum transfer rate processes and thermodynamics. Pseudotechnical explanations must not be substituted for sound fundamentals. Even when the development of a relational model is the goal of the analysis, the fundamentals must be at the forefront. [Pg.2551]

The second classification is the physical model. Examples are the rigorous modiiles found in chemical-process simulators. In sequential modular simulators, distillation and kinetic reactors are two important examples. Compared to relational models, physical models purport to represent the ac tual material, energy, equilibrium, and rate processes present in the unit. They rarely, however, include any equipment constraints as part of the model. Despite their complexity, adjustable parameters oearing some relation to theoiy (e.g., tray efficiency) are required such that the output is properly related to the input and specifications. These modds provide more accurate predictions of output based on input and specifications. However, the interactions between the model parameters and database parameters compromise the relationships between input and output. The nonlinearities of equipment performance are not included and, consequently, significant extrapolations result in large errors. Despite their greater complexity, they should be considered to be approximate as well. [Pg.2555]

Required Sensitivity This is difficult to establish a priori. It is important to recognize that no matter the sophistication, the model will not be an absolute representation of the unit. The confidence in the model is compromised by the parameter estimates that, in theoiy, represent a limitation in the equipment performance but actually embody a host of limitations. Three principal limitations affecting the accuracy of model parameters are ... [Pg.2555]

This matrix will contain information regarding loading characteristics such as flooding hmits, exchanger areas, pump curves, reactor volumes, and the like. While this matrix may be adjusted during the course of model development, it is a boundary on any possible interpretation of the measurements. For example, distillation-column performance markedly deteriorates as flood is approached. Flooding represents a boundary. These boundaries and nonlinearities in equipment performance must be accounted for. [Pg.2560]

Measurement versus Equipment Performance Pumps that are in reasonable condition typically operate within 5 percent of their pump curve. Consequently, pressures and flows that are inconsistent with the pump curve imply that the indicated flow and/or pressure are incorrecl . Figure 30-16 shows a single impeller curve plotted as head versus flow. The point shown is inconsistent with the pump operation. Therefore, that pair of flow and pressure measurements is not validated and should not be used in the subsequent steps. [Pg.2566]

If your facilrty has several pieces of equipment performing a similar service, you may combine the reporting for such equipment on a single line. It is not necessary to enter four lines of data to cover four scrubber units, for example, if all four are treating wastes of similar character (e.g., sulfuric acid mist emissions), have similar influent concentrations, and have similar removal efficiencies. If, however, any of these parameters differ from one unit to the next, each scrubber must be listed separately. [Pg.47]

From a broader perspective, the Abnormal Situation Management Consortium is working to apply human factors theory and expert system technology to improve personnel and equipment performance during abnormal conditions. In addition to reduced risk, economic improvements in equipment reliability and capacity are expected (Rothenberg and Nimmo, 1996). [Pg.108]

HAZSEC generates two types of records. The first page is the log sheet with the time, date, rc% ision number, team leader, and team members. This page also contains a section that describes the part of the plant design under investigation, and a statement of the design intent, i.e., the expected equipment performance under normal and accident conditions. The pages that follow repeat this... [Pg.87]

Regular Measures to secure that system and equipment performance are Energy audits... [Pg.19]

The technology in the fume capture field Is not well developed, and performances of many capture systems are low and typically may be in the 30% to 60% range. There is a paucity of fundamental research and development in the fume capture field. In contrast, hundreds of million of dollars have iteen spent on research and development activities in the gas-cleaning area, which is mature and well developed. It is not uncommon to specify and to measure gas-cleaning equipment performances of over 99.9% colleaion efficiency. As shown in Eq. (13.75), the ovcTall fume control system performance is determined by the product of the capture efficiency and the gas-cleaning efficiency. This equation clearly shows the need to improve the efficiency of capture of the fume at the source in order to obtain significant improvements in the overall fume control system performance. [Pg.1274]

The European Reliability Data System An Organized Information Exchange on the Operation of European Nuclear Reactors Nuclear Comprehensive records on equipment failure,frequency, modes, unusual events, and plant production U.S. European nuclear reactor data on equipment performance, repair and maintenance 65. [Pg.60]

The German Gesellschaft fur Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) has a private arrangement with Rheinische Westalisches Elekrizitatswerke (RWE) to compile reliability data from an operating power plant, Biblis B. The data base contains failure rate, maintenance, and operational event data. External event data (floods, earthquake, fire, etc.) are compiled through a separate utility-sponsored data base. The data base provides information on repair and maintenance, and equipment performance. [Pg.66]

Event An occurrence involving equipment performance or human action, or an occurrence external to the system that causes system upset. In this book, an event is associated with an incident either as the cause or a contributing cause of the incident or as a response to the initiating event. [Pg.286]

The chapters are developed by design function and not in accordance with previously suggested standards for unit operations. In fact, some of the chapters use the same principles, but require different interpretations that take into account the process and the function the equipment performs in the process. [Pg.644]

Miyauchi and Vermeulen (M7, M8) have presented a mathematical analysis of the effect upon equipment performance of axial mixing in two-phase continuous flow operations, such as absorption and extraction. Their solutions are based, in one case, upon a simplified diffusion model that assumes a mean axial dispersion coefficient and a mean flow velocity for... [Pg.86]

Solutions for diffusion with and without chemical reaction in continuous systems have been reported elsewhere (G2, G6). In general, all the parameters in this model can be determined or estimated, and the theoretical expressions may assist in the interpretation of mass-transfer data and the prediction of equipment performance. [Pg.359]

These parameters can be determined and predicted, and the theoretical expressions may thus assist in interpretation of mass-transfer data and in prediction of equipment performance. The case of mass transfer without chemical reaction is reported elsewhere (G5). [Pg.369]

Devices used in combination with other devices or equipment Performance of the overall system must be considered... [Pg.169]


See other pages where Equipment performance is mentioned: [Pg.325]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.1427]    [Pg.2270]    [Pg.2544]    [Pg.2546]    [Pg.2547]    [Pg.2551]    [Pg.2556]    [Pg.2578]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.25]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 ]




SEARCH



Applications and Performance of Equipment

Equipment Performance Assumptions

Equipment Performance Tests

Equipment Sterilization Performance Qualification Protocol

Equipment Sterilization Performance Qualification Summary Report

Equipment and Some General Remarks Concerning Performance of the Procedures

Equipment design, performance-influencing factors

Equipment performance testing

Equipment performance tests, example

Extraction equipment performance comparison

Filtration equipment application and performance

Grinding and crushing equipment performance

High-performance liquid chromatography column-packing equipment

High-performance liquid chromatography equipment

High-performance liquid chromatography equipment used

High-performance liquid equipment

Ion exchange equipment performance, Uranium recovery

Performance Qualification of Computerized Equipment

Performance personal protective equipment

Qualification equipment performance test

Reactor equipment performance

Reactor equipment performance bubble columns

© 2024 chempedia.info