EPA approval

Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is a solvent and coupling agent for a phosphate-type insecticide used to control the gypsy moth. Esters of tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol are used in preparations employed as insect repeUents. Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is also used as a solvent—carrier for an EPA-approved paper sHmicide formulation. In this appHcation, the exceptional solvent action of tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol prevents separation of the... 

Table 3. EPA Approved Oxygenated Compounds for Use in Unleaded Gasoline ...

Polyalurninum chloride products used in the treatment of potable (drinking) water must be approved by the National Sanitation Eoundation (NSE). NSE certification has superseded EPA approval. Aluminum chlorohydrate for topical use as an antiperspirant is regulated by PDA. 

States have made substantial recent progress in the adoption, and EPA approval, of toxic pollutant water-quahty standards. Furthermore, virtually all states have at least proposed new toxics criteria for priority toxic pollutants since Section 303 (c) (2) (B) was added to the CWA in February of 1987. Unfortunately, not all such state proposals address, in a comprehensive manner, the requirements or Section 303 (c) (2) (B). For example, some states have proposed to adopt criteria to protect aquatic hfe, but not human health other states have proposed human health criteria that do not address major exposure pathways (such as the combination of both fish consumption and drinking water). In addition, in some cases final adoption or proposed state toxics criteria that would be approved by EPA has been substantially delayed due to controversial and difficult issues associated with the toxic pollutant criteria adoption process. 

The states are required to submit to the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans, known as State Implementation Plans (SIP), showing how they will achieve the standards in their jurisdictions within a specified time period. If after that time period there are areas within the states where these standards have not been attained, the states are required to submit and obtain EPA approval of revised plans to achieve the standards in these "nonattainment" areas. EPA also designates certain areas where the standards are being met, but which have the potential for future nonattainment, as Air Quality Maintenance Areas (AQMA). Such regions have stricter requirements than attainment areas for the granting of permits for new sources of the pollutant not in attainment status. 

At the time of the Site I audit, only two established work zones remained on site an exehision zone eneompassing the waste treatment area and a elean zone eneompassing the remainder of the site. Aeeord-ing to the eontraetor s projeet manager, EPA approved this reduetion in site work zones. As a result of this zone designation, workers exit the exehision zone direetly into a elean zone, removing and disearding PPE in a barrel adjaeent to the operations trailer. 

Steveirs, R. K., R. J. Drago, and Y. Mamane. A Long Path Differential Optical Absorpnon Speerrometer and EPA-Approved Fixed-Point Methods Inrercomparison. Atmospheric Enro vanincnt 27B (1993), pp. 231-236. 

Mud Toxicity Test. Presently, the only toxicity test for drilling fluids having an EPA approval is the Mysid shrimp bioassay. The test was developed in the mid-1970s as a joint effort of the EPA and the oil industry. 

There is a discrepancy between the cyanide criteria for both aquatic and drinking water standards and the current analytical technology. The criteria are stated for free cyanide (which Includes hydrocyanic acid and the cyanide ion), but the EPA approved analytical methodology for total cyanide measures the free and combined forms (11). This test probably overestimates the potential toxicity. An alternative method (cyanides amenable to chlorination) measures those cyanide complexes which are readily dissociated, but does not measure the iron cyanide complexes which dissociate in sunlight. This method probably tends to underestimate the potential toxicity. Other methods have been proposed, but similar problems exist (12). The Department of Ecology used the EPA-approved APHA procedure which includes a distillation step for the quantification of total cyanide (13,14). A modification of the procedure which omits the distillation step was used for estimation of free cyanide. Later in the study, the Company used a microdiffusion method for free cyanide (15). 

Corrosive wastes are acidic or alkaline (basic) wastes which can readily corrode or dissolve flesh, metal, or other materials. They are also among the most common hazardous wastestreams. Waste sulfuric acid from automotive batteries is an example of a corrosive waste. U.S. EPA uses two criteria to identify corrosive hazardous wastes. The first is a pH test. Aqueous wastes with a pH greater than or equal to 12.5, or less than or equal to 2 are corrosive under U.S. EPA s rules. A waste may also be corrosive if it has the ability to corrode steel in a specific U.S. EPA-approved test protocol. 

In 1986, six states (California, Kentucky, Louisianan, Maryland, North Carolina, and South Carolina) had fully U.S. EPA-approved plans to control TRS at kraft pulp mills, two states had approved TRS standards but their compliance schedules had not yet been approved (Arkansas and Georgia), and... 

Recognized, acceptable, and when possible, U.S. EPA-approved air modeling is used to help screen and identify potentially impacted areas as mentioned previously. 

Approved Methods of Waste Disposal Decontamination of waste or excess material shall be accomplished according to procedures outlined above and can be destroyed by incineration in EPA approved incinerators according to appropriate provisions of federal, state, and local Resource Conservation Act (RCRA) regulations. Note Some decontamination solutions are hazardous waste according to RCRA regulations and must be disposed of according to these regulations. 

Waste Disposal Method Open pit burning or burying of VX or items containing or contaminated with VX in any quantity is prohibited. The detoxified VX(using procedures above) can be thermally destroyed by in a EPA approved incinerator according to appropriate provisions of Federal, State, or local Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations. 

WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD All decontaminated material should be collected, contained and chemically decontaminated or thermally decomposed in an EPA approved incinerator, which will filter or scrub toxic by-products from effluent air before discharge to the atmosphere. Any contaminated protective clothing should be decontaminated using HTH or bleach and analyzed to assure it is free of detectable contamination (3X) level. The clothing should then be sealed in plastic bags inside properly labeled drums and held for shipment back to the DA issue point. Decontamination of waste or excess material shall be accomplished in accordance with the procedures outlined above with the following exception ... 

DeVita and Crunkilton (1998) have examined QC associated with the use of SPMDs. The results of their study demonstrated that quality control measures applied to SPMD analysis met or surpassed conventional guidelines (EPA Method 610 for PAHs in water was used for this comparison) for precision and accuracy. This elevated level of data quality was achieved even though measurements of both overall precision and accuracy of SPMD data encompassed more steps (each with the potential for variability) than the conventional method. In summary, DeVita and Crunkilton (1998) found that QC measures could be used to validate data from the analysis of SPMDs used in the field. In view of the state of SPMD QC, it appears that the SPMD approach for monitoring hydrophobic organic contaminants is equivalent to some EPA-approved methods. 

Thomas and Delfino (1991) equilibrated contaminant-free groundwater collected from Gainesville, FL with individual fractions of three individual petroleum products at 24-25 °C for 24 h. The aqueous phase was analyzed for organic compounds via U.S. EPA approved test method 625. Average acenaphthene concentrations reported in water-soluble fractions of unleaded... 

Thomas and Delfino (1991) equilibrated contaminant-free groundwater collected from Gainesville, FL with individual fractions of three individual petroleum products at 24-25 °C for 24 h. The aqueous phase was analyzed for organic compounds via U.S. EPA approved test method 602. Average benzene concentrations reported in water-soluble fractions of unleaded gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel were 8.652, 0.349, and 0.200 mg/L, respectively. When the authors analyzed the aqueous-phase via U.S. EPA approved test method 610, average benzene concentrations in water-soluble fractions of unleaded gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel were lower, i.e., 1.107, 0.073, and 0.066 mg/L, respectively. 

When the authors analyzed the aqueous-phase via U.S. EPA approved test method 610, average 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene concentrations in water-soluble fractions of unleaded gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel were smaller, i.e., 742, 291, and 105 pg/L, respectively. 

These permit modifications were submitted to EPA from April 2000 through July 2000. Currently, two permit modifications are partially approved and awaiting final EPA approval. The remaining four permit modifications have been approved. Permit modifications need to be identified with sufficient lead time to allow EPA regulatory review, public comment, and the resolution of any EPA and/or public comments. Delays in the approval of permit modifications can delay the completion of closure. If the Army elects to implement an ECP prior to EPA approval, it does so at its own financial and/or schedule risk. Potential delays and... 

---