Environmental standards drinking water

Standards and Regulations Regarding Metals and Their Compounds in Environmental Materials, Drinking Water, Food, Feeding-stuff, Consumer Products, and Other Materials... 

Today resource limitations have caused the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to reassess schedules for new rules. A 1987 USEPA survey indicated there were approximately 202,000 public water systems in the United States. About 29 percent of these were community water systems, which serve approximately 90 percent of the population. Of the 58,908 community systems that serve about 226 million people, 51,552 were classified as "small" or "very small." Each of these systems at an average serves a population of fewer than 3300 people. The total population served by these systems is approximately 25 million people. These figures provide us with a magnitude of scale in meeting drinking water demands in the United States. Compliance with drinking water standards is not... 

EPA. 2000a. Drinking water standards and health advisories. Office of Water. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 822-B-OO-OO1. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Health Advisory— An estimate of acceptable drinking water levels for a chemical substance based on health effects information. A health advisory is not a legally enforceable federal standard, but serves as technical guidance to assist federal, state, and local officials. 

EPA 822-B-OO-OOl, US Environmental Protection Agency, Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories, Office of Water, Washington, DC (2000). 

Water for injection (WFI) is the most widely used solvent for parenteral preparations. The USP requirements for WFI and purified water have been recently updated to replace the traditional wet and colorimetric analytical methods with the more modern and cost-effective methods of conductivity and total organic carbon. Water for injection must be prepared and stored in a manner to ensure purity and freedom from pyrogens. The most common means of obtaining WFI is by the distillation of deionized water. This is the only method of preparation permitted by the European Pharmacopoeia (EP). In contrast, the USP and the Japanese Pharmacopeias also permit reverse osmosis to be used. The USP has also recently broadened its definition of source water to include not only the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Primary Drinking Water Standards, but also comparable regulations of the European Union or Japan. 

FSTRAC. 1995. Summary of state and federal drinking water standards and guidelines. U S. Environmental Protection Agency. Contaminant Policy and Communications Subcommittee. Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). September 12, 1995. 

The Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, and the EPA has sampled 308 former USDA/CCC grain storage facilities. These efforts revealed 80 locations (26%) had detections of carbon tetrachloride, with 35 (11%) of these locations exceeding the drinking water standard of five micro grams per liter. 

FSTRAC. 1990. Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Chemical Communication Subcommittee, Federal and State Toxicology and Regulatory Alliance Committee (FSTRAC), Washington, DC. 

The ability to provide accurate and reliable data is central to the role of analytical chemists, not only in areas like the development and manufacture of drugs, food control or drinking water analysis, but also in the field of environmental chemistry, where there is an increasing need for certified laboratories (ISO 9000 standards). The quality of analytical data is a key factor in successfully identifying and monitoring contamination of environmental compartments. In this context, a large collection of methods applied to the routine analysis of prime environmental pollutants has been developed and validated, and adapted in nationally or internationally harmonised protocols (DIN, EPA). Information on method performance generally provides data on specificity, accuracy, precision (repeatability and reproducibility), limit of detection, sensitivity, applicability and practicability, as appropriate. 

The most cost-effective, technically feasible remediation procedures are not always in agreement with regulatory controls. Environmental regulations, by their very nature, must be applicable for a wide variety of settings and must protect the overall environment. In past years remediation standards were established as general numerical concentrations usually based on drinking water standards or other health-related criteria borrowed from related public health fields. This type of remediation was often generic, not site specific. 

---