Environmental quality standards application

Regarding the specific issue of NP and NPEOs there is still some disparity between the USA and Europe. In Europe, voluntary bans in the industrial sector are in place and in household applications they are already forbidden, with environmental quality standards set at 1 pgL-1 levels. However, in the USA the situation is quite different with much milder measures being taken such as pollution prevention or source reduction efforts, as opposed to the outright APEO ban in Europe. 

The book is based on contributions from thirty-five scientists, regulators, and policy makers from eleven countries with individual expertise across disciplines such as risk assessment, environmental, health, economic, and social sciences. These scientists summarize current knowledge on aquatic and terrestrial environmental quality standards, placing these standards in a wider socioeconomic and regulatory context. The book explains how to derive environmental standards that are defensible from a scientific and socioeconomic perspective. Using multidisciplinary techniques applicable to water, sediments, and soils, the text demonstrates how to select the best form and derivation method relative to individual environmental standards. 

Wise SA (1993) Standard reference materials for the determination of trace organic constituents in environmental samples. In Barcelo D, ed. Environmental Analysis Techniques, Applications and Quality Assurance, pp 403-446. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Wise SA, and Schantz MM (1997) Standard reference materials for the determination of trace organic contaminants in environmental samples. In Clement R and Siu M, eds. Reference Materials for Environmental Analysis Making and Using Them, pp 143-186. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. 

At NSF, a great deal of work is done on the development and implementation of NSF standards and criteria for health-related equipment. The majority of NSF standards relate to water treatment and purification equipment, products for swimming pool applications, plastic pipe for potable water as well as drain, waste, and vent (DWV) uses, plumbing components for mobil homes and recreational vehicles, laboratory furniture, hospital cabinets, polyethylene refuse bags and containers, aerobic waste treatment plants, and other products related to environmental quality. 

The ways in which Environmental Quality and Human Health Standards are derived, and the frameworks within which they are used, differ between countries and regions, with standards derived, expressed, monitored, and implemented in different ways. To some extent, this diversity reflects genuine technical differences that must be taken into account in the development of standards for different compartments (e.g., water or soil) or for different receptors (e.g., humans, livestock, or flora and fauna). However, much standard setting has been developed in a piecemeal fashion with little consistency between schemes in the levels of protection sought, the selection of chemicals for which standards may be needed, the methods used to derive them, or the methods used to monitor compliance. These differences can lead to the implementation of substantially different values from the same empirical data, which must mean that their application is either over- or underprotective in at least some situations. 

There may be occasions when a standard is set at a concentration below current analytical limits of detection (LODs) or limits of quantification (LOQs). This could be because high uncertainty leads to the application of large assessment factors to toxicity data to derive a standard or because analytical techniques for a particular environmental matrix have higher LODs/LOQs than those available for the medium in which the standard was derived (e.g., sewage effluent versus laboratory water). An inability to measure concentrations of a chemical at the standard does not necessarily render the standard totally useless. For example, a water quality standard set in a receiving watercourse may be below the LOD/LOQ, but measurement of concentrations from an effluent may be above these limits. Appropriate modeling may allow good estimation of whether the standard in the watercourse has been exceeded. 

Offsets Policy Offsets were EPA s first application of the concept that one source could meet its environmental protection obligations by getting another source to assume additional control actions. In nonattainment areas, pollution from a proposed new source, even one that controls its emissions to the lowest possible level, would aggravate existing violations of ambient air-quality standards and trigger the statutory prohibition. The offsets policy provided these new sources with an alternative. The source could proceed with construction plans, provided that ... 

Affected Surface Water/Sediments Applicable water quality standards for classified surface water bodies. Review applicable environmental regulations. 

The safest and most convenient way of handling and processing red phosphorus (P-red), which is flammable in powder form, is the use of concentrates or masterbatches in a wide range of resin systems for a variety of applications. Quality standards are now being linked to the safety and environmental effects of the additives polymer compounds contain. Consequently the toxicity and environmental concerns about P-red have been under the spotlight recently. 

The ability to provide accurate and reliable data is central to the role of analytical chemists, not only in areas like the development and manufacture of drugs, food control or drinking water analysis, but also in the field of environmental chemistry, where there is an increasing need for certified laboratories (ISO 9000 standards). The quality of analytical data is a key factor in successfully identifying and monitoring contamination of environmental compartments. In this context, a large collection of methods applied to the routine analysis of prime environmental pollutants has been developed and validated, and adapted in nationally or internationally harmonised protocols (DIN, EPA). Information on method performance generally provides data on specificity, accuracy, precision (repeatability and reproducibility), limit of detection, sensitivity, applicability and practicability, as appropriate. 

---