Environmental impacts landscape

Many factors affect the mechanisms and kinetics of sorption and transport processes. For instance, differences in the chemical stmcture and properties, ie, ionizahility, solubiUty in water, vapor pressure, and polarity, between pesticides affect their behavior in the environment through effects on sorption and transport processes. Differences in soil properties, ie, pH and percentage of organic carbon and clay contents, and soil conditions, ie, moisture content and landscape position climatic conditions, ie, temperature, precipitation, and radiation and cultural practices, ie, crop and tillage, can all modify the behavior of the pesticide in soils. Persistence of a pesticide in soil is a consequence of a complex interaction of processes. Because the persistence of a pesticide can govern its availabiUty and efficacy for pest control, as weU as its potential for adverse environmental impacts, knowledge of the basic processes is necessary if the benefits of the pesticide ate to be maximized. 

Although the experts assessments vary enormously by country, the mean values show that the most important subjects with respect to the environmental impacts of organic farming are landscape, soil, ground and surface water and biodiversity. Climate as well as air and energy uses are, however, assessed to be of only minor importance. Only two experts identified animal health and welfare to be of special importance for organic farming in this context. 

Reenberg, A. and Baudry, J. 1999. Land use and landscape changes - the challenge of comparative analysis of rural areas in Europe. In Kronert, R., Baudry, J., Bowler, I.R. and Reenberg, A. (eds) Land Use Changes and Their Environmental Impact in Rural Areas in Europe. Man and the Biosphere Series Volume 24. UNESCO, Paris, and Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth. 

Sulfur and nitrogen oxides are not the only output from coal combustion that may leave a detectible environmental impact. Particulate matter (fly ash) is also released during coal combustion and can be detected near coal-fired power plants (Flanders, 1999 Godbeer and Swain, 1995 Kapicka et al, 1999). The focus of the present study was to test whether these particulate emissions have produced a detectible impact on the geochemical landscape downwind from power plants. It is already known that atmospheric inputs can be detected in lake and reservoir sediments (Locke and Bertine, 1986 Norton, 1986), and we sought to further test whether atmospheric coal fly ash inputs could be identified and quantified. 

These published studies have recognised wool and meat as the co-products for sheep production systems of interest. However, sheep systems in some regions also provide milk with high economic value for human food. It is also recognised that sheep can provide other functions that can potentially be accounted for, thereby reducing the environmental impacts allocated to wool. For example, RipoU-Bosch et al. (2013) studied sheep systems in Spain and noted that the benefits of sheep to ecosystem services (e.g. conservation of biodiversity and landscapes) were important in extensive mid-high altitude natural/seminatural areas and allocated up to one-half of total GHG emissions to these ecosystem services based on an economic approach. 

Reduce the environmental impact on the landscape of roads, paths, gardens and so on. 

The totem of the comparison between natural and anthropic environment shows two empty landscapes which visitors are invited to fill in using the elements we made available. For the natural environment it is possible to pick out some dangerous elements to be stuck on the picture (ferocious animals, lightning, forces of nature, etc.). For the anthropic environment, man s transformations are valued with pros and cons (industry, breeding farms, woods, galleries, streets, skyscrapers, etc.). Here usually discussions concerning the environmental impact of every single person s daily habits are run. 

Forestry research embraces both the monitoring of environmental impacts on forest ecosystems as well as the impact of forestry on surrounding landscapes, in particular on water catchments. Studies carried out have analysed soil to monitor the effects of acid rain on forest nutrition in relation to observed disease sus ceptibility in trees from different geographical loca tions. It is postulated that immobilization of essential plant nutrients such as calcium and magnesium oc curs in soil where toxic aluminium becomes increas ingly mobile owing to the reduced soil pH attributed to acid rain. Routine monitoring of water catchments that surround forestry follows the level of movement of both nutrient elements (N and P) and other forest exudates (Mn, Cu, Zn, Sr and Ba) in run-off. Both F AAS and GF AAS are used in these analyses and offer acceptable sensitivity and precision. 

A comparison between nanofiltration and pellet softening [combined with granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption for organics removal] was made by Sombekke et al. (1997), based on a hfe-cycle analysis (LCA). Both treatment schemes were found to have a comparable impact, except that NF was advantageous for quality and health aspects. Other positive aspects for NF were the investments and costs, and the impact on the landscape. The main environmental impact for both alternatives is caused by the use of energy. The Water Supply Company of Overijssel (WMO), The Netherlands, decided to extend current treatment capacity with nanofiltration on the basis of this LCA. 

---