Environment exposures from chemicals

When EPA updated the LVE regulations in 1995, it added a new exemption for chemicals with low environmental releases and low human exposures during their life cycles as part of its overall pollution prevention strategy. The principal focus of the LoREX exemption was on release and exposure, not on toxicity.The rationale for the exemption was to encourage companies to develop manufacturing, processing, use, and disposal techniques that minimize exposures from chemicals to people and the environment. To REX chemicals undergo a shortened thirty day review period and are not subject to user fees. 

Refer to the handbook s Glossary. The definitions provided are universally recognized. Many of these terms are not just pertinent to inhalation hazards. It would be remiss not to mention other risks beyond inhalation from chemical exposure in a work environment and to the general public. 

Half-lives span a very wide range (Table 17.5). Consider strontium-90, for which the half-life is 28 a. This nuclide is present in nuclear fallout, the fine dust that settles from clouds of airborne particles after the explosion of a nuclear bomb, and may also be present in the accidental release of radioactive materials into the air. Because it is chemically very similar to calcium, strontium may accompany that element through the environment and become incorporated into bones once there, it continues to emit radiation for many years. About 10 half-lives (for strontium-90, 280 a) must pass before the activity of a sample has fallen to 1/1000 of its initial value. Iodine-131, which was released in the accidental fire at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, has a half-life of only 8.05 d, but it accumulates in the thyroid gland. Several cases of thyroid cancer have been linked to iodine-131 exposure from the accident. Plutonium-239 has a half-life of 24 ka (24000 years). Consequently, very long term storage facilities are required for plutonium waste, and land contaminated with plutonium cannot be inhabited again for thousands of years without expensive remediation efforts. 

Although the likelihood for biologically harm has not been assessed fully, for most EDCs the exposure concentrations in ambient environments (away from hotspots of chemical discharges) would suggest that they are insufficient to do so. Exceptions to this inclnde the case studies detailed in the previous section. It should, however, also be emphasized that most studies on the effects of EDCs under controlled laboratory conditions have not considered long-term chronic exposures encompassing full life cycles, and some wildlife species are exposed lifelong to some of the EDCs described earlier. 

Another negative consequence of pesticide use is that special means must be used to protect harvests from unwanted pesticide actions adsorbents, plant antidotes, microbiological detoxification means, etc. This does not only make agricultural production more expensive, but also increases the agricultural environment s exposure to chemicals, an altogether more serious consideration [3]. 

Carcinogenicity is one of the toxicological endpoints that pose the highest concern for human health. Nowadays, protection against cancer resulting from exposure to chemicals in the environment is a critical goal in public health management. 

When a chemical is released from a large area, such as an industrial plant, or from a container, such as a drum or bottle, it enters the environment as a chemical emission. This emission, which is also called a release, does not always lead to exposure. You can be exposed to a chemical only when you come into contact with the chemical. You may be exposed to it in the environment by breathing, eating, or drinking substances containing the chemical or from skin contact with it. 

People without MCS can become aware of the segment of the population that has become hidden from them because of industrial culture s refusal to moderate its rush to economic growth through exploitation of the environment. Rather than being a negligible small number, a rural household study showed that one third of the population reports some illness from chemical exposures, and four percent of people report becoming ill every single day from chemicals. This amounts to over 11 million people in the U.S. alone who suffer daily from chemically induced symptoms. Two other studies document MCS as a worldwide problem. 

The Office of Toxic Substances has assembled a team of multi-disciplined scientists to review each of these PMNs and assess the potential risks to human health and the environment posed by commercial manufacture and sale. These assessments are based upon limited firm data on the specific chemical, comparison with structurally similar chemicals of known toxicity, plus estimates of exposure from calculations of the potential number of people involved in manufacturing and processing operations and in consumer use. Most PMNs contain elementary data on physical and chemical properties and obvious acute health effect such as skin... 

The EU policy on chemical substances aims to provide an appropriate balance between protection of human health and environment from undesirable exposure to chemicals and the need for continued chemical innovation so that the citizens of the EU can reahze the potential benefits (EU 2006c). 

Current knowledge about the combined toxicological effects that may occur from exposures to different chemicals in mixtures is outlined in this chapter. Special attention is paid to the low levels of exposures normally encountered from the unintended, indirect exposure to chemical mixtures through food and environment. It should be recognized that it has not been possible to cover all possible combined exposures to chemicals in this book. 

Probably the greatest concern in the workplaces is solvent exposure from cleaning agents or chemical processes. Farmers and pesticide workers can also be exposed to compounds clearly designed to affect the nervous system. The outdoor environment can contain elevated levels of a number of persistent chemicals that can adversely affect the nervous system, such as lead, mercury, and chlorinated pesticides. 

LaKind JS, Berlin CM, Naiman DQ (2001) Infant exposure to chemicals in breast milk in the United States what we need to learn from a breast monitoring program. Environ Health Perspect, 109(1) 75-88. 

A key question here is whether the actual conditions of use will be those that are specified in the exposure scenario. For industrial uses of chemicals, where people have access to safety data sheets and are governed by health and safety and pollution control legislation, there is some hope that people will use the chemical in the way that the exposure scenario envisages. Even here, however, there are bound to be departures from the exposure scenario conditions people will not always wear protective equipment, or follow instructions, and accidents are bound to happen. Consumers, on the other hand, will usually not even know what chemicals a product contains, let alone have access to the details of the exposure scenario. Even if they had, there is no way that their following it and acting in the way it envisages could be enforced. There are therefore major uncertainties as to whether the exposure estimates derived from the exposure scenarios really represent the actual exposure of people and the environment to a chemical. 

Ideally, the levels of exposure to the safer chemical that are needed to cause the unwanted effect should be much higher than the exposure levels that are anticipated to occur from the intended use of the chemical, its release into the environment, or from waste management activities involving the chemical. If the level of exposure needed for the safer chemical to cause such an effect is very large, the safer chemical may be said to be safe for all practical purposes. 

---