Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electrospray sensitivity

Electrospray alone is a reasonably sensitive technique for use with many classes of compounds. Spectacular, unprecedented results have been obtained with accurate mass measurement of high-... [Pg.59]

The Z-spray inlet causes ions and neutrals to follow different paths after they have been formed from the electrically charged spray produced from a narrow inlet tube. The ions can be drawn into a mass analyzer after most of the solvent has evaporated away. The inlet derives its name from the Z-shaped trajectory taken by the ions, which ensures that there is little buildup of products on the narrow skimmer entrance into the mass spectrometer analyzer region. Consequently, in contrast to a conventional electrospray source, the skimmer does not need to be cleaned frequently and the sensitivity and performance of the instrument remain constant for long periods of time. [Pg.69]

Under many experimental conditions, the mass spectrometer functions as a mass-sensitive detector, while in others, with LC-MS using electrospray ionization being a good example, it can behave as a concentration-sensitive detector. The reasons for this behaviour are beyond the scope of this present book (interested readers should consult the text by Cole [8]) but reinforce the need to ensure that adequate calibration and standardization procedures are incorporated into any quantitative methodology to ensure the validity of any results obtained. [Pg.34]

The electrospray process is susceptible to competition/suppression effects. All polar/ionic species in the solution being sprayed, whether derived from the analyte or not, e.g. buffer, additives, etc., are potentially capable of being ionized. The best analytical sensitivity will therefore be obtained from a solution containing a single analyte, when competition is not possible, at the lowest flow rate (see Section 4.7.1 above) and with the narrowest diameter electrospray capillary. [Pg.164]

Factors may be classified as quantitative when they take particular values, e.g. concentration or temperature, or qualitative when their presence or absence is of interest. As mentioned previously, for an LC-MS experiment the factors could include the composition of the mobile phase employed, its pH and flow rate [3], the nature and concentration of any mobile-phase additive, e.g. buffer or ion-pair reagent, the make-up of the solution in which the sample is injected [4], the ionization technique, spray voltage for electrospray, nebulizer temperature for APCI, nebulizing gas pressure, mass spectrometer source temperature, cone voltage in the mass spectrometer source, and the nature and pressure of gas in the collision cell if MS-MS is employed. For quantification, the assessment of results is likely to be on the basis of the selectivity and sensitivity of the analysis, i.e. the chromatographic separation and the maximum production of molecular species or product ions if MS-MS is employed. [Pg.189]

In this study, the effect of mobile-phase flow rate, or more accurately, the rate of flow of liquid into the LC-MS interface, was not considered but as has been pointed out earlier in Sections 4.7 and 4.8, this is of great importance. In particular, it determines whether electrospray ionization functions as a concentration-or mass-flow-sensitive detector and may have a significant effect on the overall sensitivity obtained. Both of these are of great importance when considering the development of a quantitative analytical method. [Pg.192]

In general terms, electrospray ionization is considered to be concentration-sensitive at Tow flow rates and mass-flow-sensitive at high flow rates, while APCI is considered to be mass-flow-sensitive. Low and high are both subjective terms and require investigation as part of method validation. [Pg.192]

A method has been reported for the quantification of five fungicides (shown in Figure 5.39) used to control post-harvest decay in citrus fruits to ensure that unacceptable levels of these are not present in fruit entering the food chain [26]. A survey of the literature showed that previously [27] APCl and electrospray ionization (ESI) had been compared for the analysis of ten pesticides, including two of the five of interest, i.e. carbendazim and thiabendazole, and since it was found that APCl was more sensitive for some of these and had direct flow rate compatibility with the HPLC system being used, APCl was chosen as the basis for method development. [Pg.246]

The fact that APCl and electrospray are soft ionization techniques is often advantageous because the molecular ion alone, in conjunction with HPLC separation, often provides adequate selectivity and sensitivity to allow an analytical method to be developed. Again, method development is important, particularly when more than one analyte is to be determined, when the effect of experimental parameters, such as pH, flow rate, etc., is not likely to be the same for each. Electrospray, in particular, is susceptible to matrix effects and the method of standard additions is often required to provide adequate accuracy and precision. [Pg.290]

The most recent progress in MS analysis of chlorophylls has been obtained with the development of atmospheric ionization methods such as atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCl) and electrospray ionization (ESI). These techniques have demonstrated much more sensitivity than thermospray ionization, detecting chloro-... [Pg.438]

The method for chloroacetanilide soil metabolites in water determines concentrations of ethanesulfonic acid (ESA) and oxanilic acid (OXA) metabolites of alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor in surface water and groundwater samples by direct aqueous injection LC/MS/MS. After injection, compounds are separated by reversed-phase HPLC and introduced into the mass spectrometer with a TurboIonSpray atmospheric pressure ionization (API) interface. Using direct aqueous injection without prior SPE and/or concentration minimizes losses and greatly simplifies the analytical procedure. Standard addition experiments can be used to check for matrix effects. With multiple-reaction monitoring in the negative electrospray ionization mode, LC/MS/MS provides superior specificity and sensitivity compared with conventional liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) or liquid chromatography/ultraviolet detection (LC/UV), and the need for a confirmatory method is eliminated. In summary,... [Pg.349]

LC/MS/MS. LC/MS/MS is used for separation and quantitation of the metabolites. Using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in the negative ion electrospray ionization (ESI) mode, LC/MS/MS gives superior specificity and sensitivity to conventional liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) techniques. The improved specificity eliminates interferences typically found in LC/MS or liquid chro-matography/ultraviolet (LC/UV) analyses. Data acquisition is accomplished with a data system that provides complete instmment control of the mass spectrometer. [Pg.383]

A triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer with an electrospray interface is recommended for achieving the best sensitivity and selectivity in the quantitative determination of sulfonylurea herbicides. Ion trap mass spectrometers may also be used, but reduced sensitivity may be observed, in addition to more severe matrix suppression due to the increased need for sample concentration or to the space charge effect. Also, we have observed that two parent to daughter transitions cannot be obtained for some of the sulfonylurea compounds when ion traps are used in the MS/MS mode. Most electrospray LC/MS and LC/MS/MS analyses of sulfonylureas have been done in the positive ion mode with acidic HPLC mobile phases. The formation of (M - - H)+ ions in solution and in the gas phase under these conditions is favorable, and fragmentation or formation of undesirable adducts can easily be minimized. Owing to the acid-base nature of these molecules, negative ionization can also be used, with the formation of (M - H) ions at mobile phase pH values of approximately 5-7, but the sensitivity is often reduced as compared with the positive ion mode. [Pg.402]

Optimized to provide maximum response for the (M + H)+ ion this process is usually automated. Then, the settings for the collision cell are optimized to produce maximum response of one or two characteristic daughter ions. Most modern instruments allow this to be done automatically. In general, sulfonylureas are very amenable to positive ion electrospray MS and MS/MS analysis, with excellent sensitivity compared with most other agrochemicals, and optimal responses can be easily obtained by proficient operators. [Pg.403]

For HPLC/MS/MS analysis, a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer with an electrospray interface is recommended for achieving the best sensitivity and speciflcity in the quantitative determination of oxime carbamates and their metabolites. This allows... [Pg.1148]


See other pages where Electrospray sensitivity is mentioned: [Pg.515]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.1029]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.769]    [Pg.821]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.1146]    [Pg.1148]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.61]   


SEARCH



Electrospray interface sensitivity

Sensitivity electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy

© 2024 chempedia.info