Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electron impact ionization experimental technique

Theoretical models of the electron impact ionization process have focused on the calculation of the ionization cross section and its energy dependence they are divided into quantum, semiclassical and semiempirical. Methods for the calculation of the ionization cross section and experimental techniques developed for the measurement of absolute ionization cross sections will be described in more detail below. Cross sections calculated using the semiempirical additivity method developed by Deutsch and Mark (DM) and their coworkers,12-14 the binary-encounter-Bethe (BEB) method of Kim and Rudd,15 16 and the electrostatic model (EM) developed by Vallance, Harland, and Maclagan17,18 are compared to each other and to experimental data. [Pg.321]

We review the general concept of ionization-cross-section measurements and describe briefly the two experimental techniques employed in the particular ionization-cross-section measurements discussed in this article. A comprehensive review of electron impact ionization is given in the book by Mark and Dunn (1985). [Pg.149]

Improvements in experimental technique and analysis will no doubt continue to be made with most emphasis on valence band spectra, and perhaps involving the measurement of other parameters simultaneously with ionization energies. For example, electron impact ionization experiments on gas molecules with determination of the kinematics of incident and emitted electrons can provide information on electron binding energies and on the momentum distribution of valence electrons,< > allowing a very severe test of theoretical descriptions. [Pg.190]

Among the possibilities available to postionize sputter-ejected neutral surface particles, electron impact ionization has been employed in a variety of experimental approaches. More recently, photoionization by resonant or nonresonant multiphoton absorption processes has been established as another very effective technique in SNMS. Other processes as Penning ionization or charge exchange play only a minor role in postionization for SNMS. [Pg.4670]

The apparatus and techniques of ion cyclotron resonance spectroscopy have been described in detail elsewhere. Ions are formed, either by electron impact from a volatile precursor, or by laser evaporation and ionization of a solid metal target (14), and allowed to interact with neutral reactants. Freiser and co-workers have refined this experimental methodology with the use of elegant collision induced dissociation experiments for reactant preparation and the selective introduction of neutral reactants using pulsed gas valves (15). Irradiation of the ions with either lasers or conventional light sources during selected portions of the trapped ion cycle makes it possible to study ion photochemical processes... [Pg.17]

General Methods. The instrument that will be used to execute the gas-phase experimental portion of the proposed research is a Finnigan 2001 dual-cell Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (FTMS or FTICR), equipped with both electron impact (FI) and electrospray ionization (FSl). FTMS is a high-resolution, high-sensitivity technique that allows the entrapment and detection of gas-phase species. Gas-phase ions are trapped in a magnetic field, much like a reactant sits in a flask in solution. The instrument is a mass spectrometer therefore, we will often refer to the mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio of ions, which is the method we use to identify species. (M-l) or (M-H) refers to a molecule M that has been deprotonated for example, HjO has an (M-f) ion of m/z 17 (HO ). [Pg.466]

Conventional electron impact or chemical ionization mass spectrometry requires that volatilization precede ionization and this is clearly a limiting factor in the analysis of many biochemically significant compounds. A newer ionization technique, field desorption (FD) (1, 2 ) removes this requirement and makes it possible to obtain mass spectrometric information on thermally unstable or non-volatile organic compounds such as glycoconjugates and salts. This development is particularly significant for those concerned with the analysis of glycolipids and we have therefore explored the suitability of field desorption mass spectrometry (FDMS) for this class of compounds. We have evaluated experimental procedures in order to enhance the efficiency of the ionization process and to maximize the information content of spectra obtained by this technique. [Pg.35]

Various ionization techniques applied in association with Py-GC/MS are reported in literature (see e.g. [12]). However, the most common ionization method is electron impact with the detection of positive ions (EI+). The chemical ionization (Cl) is sometimes used, but Cl spectra interpretation is difficult because of the lack of fragmentation and because the reproducibility in Cl is affected by the experimental conditions in which the spectra are generated. However, Cl spectra provide valuable information regarding the molecular mass of the analyte, and this can be very useful in combination with EI+ spectral information. [Pg.149]

As new values were obtained, atomic electron affinities were reviewed periodically beginning in 1953 [1-13]. All the available experimental, extrapolated, and theoretical values were tabulated in 1984 [7]. Presently, experimental values are available at the NIST website [12]. Prior to 1970 the majority of the values for the main group elements were determined by the Born Haber cycle, electron impact, or relative and absolute equilibrium surface ionization techniques. However, values for C, O, and S had been measured by photodetachment [1-3]. By the mid-1970s virtually all the Ea of the main group elements in the first three rows had been measured by photon methods [4-7]. By the early 1980s values were obtained for the transition elements by photon techniques [7, 8]. In the 1990s the values of Ca, Sr, and Ba were measured [9-13]. Recently, experimental values have been reported for Ce, Pr, Tm, and Lu [14-17],... [Pg.169]

Dupre C, Lahmam-Bennani A and Duguet A 1991 About some experimental aspects of double and triple coincidence techniques to study electron Impact double Ionizing processes Meas. Sci. Technol. 2 327... [Pg.1436]

Any technique for gas analysis can be applied to EGA. The most frequently used methods are mass spectroscopy (MS) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Many instrument manufacturers provide the ability to interface their TGAs with MS or FTIR (see Section 3.7, on instrumentation). Temporal resolution between the TGA and the MS or FTIR detector is an important feature, for example, in distinguishing absorbed water from water as a reaction product and in assigning a decomposition product to a specific mass loss. Each method has its experimental requirements, limitations, and advantages. Mass spectroscopy is a very sensitive technique that identifies volatile species by their mass-to-charge ratio, referred to as m/z. The evolution of the sum of all mJz species can be plotted and compared with the derivative TGA plot to ensure temporal resolution between the TGA and the mass spectrometer. The evolution of a specific mJz, associated with species such as water or formaldehyde, can show the distinct evolution of these compounds. The most common ionization is by 70eV electron impact (El), which operates... [Pg.249]


See other pages where Electron impact ionization experimental technique is mentioned: [Pg.534]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.757]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.872]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.139]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.27 , Pg.28 ]




SEARCH



Electron impact

Electron impact ionization

Electron impact technique

Electron techniques

Electronic ionizing techniques

Impact ionization

Ionization techniques

© 2024 chempedia.info