Electrochemical detectors detection limits

Goodwin et al. [82] determined trace sulphides in turbid waters by a gas dialysis-ion chromatographic method. The sulphide is converted to hydrogen sulphide which is then isolated from the sample matrix by diffusion through a gas dialysis membrane and trapped in a dilute sodium hydroxide solution. A 200pL portion of this solution is injected into an ion chromatograph for determination with an electrochemical detector. Detection limits were >1.9ng/mL... 

HPLC with electrochemical detector detection limits (in fmol) NE, 80 E, 180 DA, 262... 

Electrochemical Detectors Another common group of HPLC detectors are those based on electrochemical measurements such as amperometry, voltammetry, coulometry, and conductivity. Figure 12.29b, for example, shows an amperometric flow cell. Effluent from the column passes over the working electrode, which is held at a potential favorable for oxidizing or reducing the analytes. The potential is held constant relative to a downstream reference electrode, and the current flowing between the working and auxiliary electrodes is measured. Detection limits for amperometric electrochemical detection are 10 pg-1 ng of injected analyte. 

For an analyte of molecular weight 5000 and good chromatographic conditions, most photometric detectors can be expected to provide detection limits of 2—5 ng. Improvement into the mid-picogram or lower range normally requires the use of more sensitive detection means such as fluorescence or electrochemical detectors. 

Post-column on-line derivatisation is carried out in a special reactor situated between the column and detector. A feature of this technique is that the derivatisation reaction need not go to completion provided it can be made reproducible. The reaction, however, needs to be fairly rapid at moderate temperatures and there should be no detector response to any excess reagent present. Clearly an advantage of post-column derivatisation is that ideally the separation and detection processes can be optimised separately. A problem which may arise, however, is that the most suitable eluant for the chromatographic separation rarely provides an ideal reaction medium for derivatisation this is particularly true for electrochemical detectors which operate correctly only within a limited range of pH, ionic strength and aqueous solvent composition. 

Depending on their conversion efficiency, electrochemical detectors can be divided into two categories those that electrolyze only a negligible fraction (0.1-5%) of the electroactive species passing through the detector (amperometric detectors), and those for which the conversion efficiency approaches 100% (coulo-metric detectors). Unfortunately, the increased conversion efficiency of the analyte is accompanied by a similar increase for the electrolyte (background) reactions, and no lowering of detection limits is reahzed. 

Instead of immobilizing the antibody onto the transducer, it is possible to use a bare (amperometric or potentiometric) electrode for probing enzyme immunoassay reactions (42). In this case, the content of the immunoassay reaction vessel is injected to an appropriate flow system containing an electrochemical detector, or the electrode can be inserted into the reaction vessel. Remarkably low (femtomolar) detection limits have been reported in connection with the use of the alkaline phosphatase label (43,44). This enzyme catalyzes the hydrolysis of phosphate esters to liberate easily oxidizable phenolic products. 

HPLC has been recommended as a cleanup and fiactionation procedure for food samples prior to analysis by GC/ECD (Gillespie and Walters 1986). The advantages over the AOAC-recommended Florisil colunrn are that it is faster, requires less solvent, and gives better resolution. HPLC coupled with various detectors MS, MS/MS, UV/electrochemical detector, or UV/polarographic detection has been tested as a rapid, simplified separation and detection system to replace GC (Betowski and Jones 1988 Clark et al. 1985 Koen and Huber 1970). Recoveries, detection limits, and precisions were generally good, but further work is needed before the techniques are adopted for general use. 

Bergstrom et al. [63] used HPLC for determination of penicillamine in body fluids. Proteins were precipitated from plasma and hemolyzed blood with trichloroacetic acid and metaphosphoric acid, respectively, and, after centrifugation, the supernatant solution was injected into the HPLC system via a 20-pL loop valve. Urine samples were directly injected after dilution with 0.4 M citric acid. Two columns (5 cm x 0.41 cm and 30 cm x 0.41 cm) packed with Zipax SCX (30 pm) were used as the guard and analytical columns, respectively. The mobile phase (2.5 mL/min) was deoxygenated 0.03 M citric acid-0.01 M Na2HP04 buffer, and use was made of an electrochemical detector equipped with a three-electrode thin-layer cell. The method was selective and sensitive for mercapto-compounds. Recoveries of penicillamine averaged 101% from plasma and 107% from urine, with coefficients of variation equal to 3.68 and 4.25%, respectively. The limits of detection for penicillamine were 0.5 pm and 3 pm in plasma and in urine, respectively. This method is selective and sensitive for sulfhydryl compounds. 

Aniline, methyl aniline, 1-naphthylamine, and diphenylamine at trace levels were determined using this technique and electrochemical detection. Two electrochemical detectors (a thin-layer, dual glassy-carbon electrode cell and a dual porous electrode system) were compared. The electrochemical behavior of the compounds was investigated using hydrodynamic and cyclic voltammetry. Detection limits of 15 and 1.5nmol/l were achieved using colourimetric and amperometric cells, respectively, when using an in-line preconcentration step. 

Fluorescence detection can be up to four orders of magnitude more sensitive than UV absorbance, especially where laser induced excitation is used, mass detection limits being as low as 10-20—10 21 mole. Pre- and post-column derivatization methods are being developed to extend the applicability of fluorescence detection to non-fluorescent substances. Several types of electrochemical and mass spectrometric detector have also been designed. Detector characteristics are summarized in Table 4.21. 

Several kinds of detection systems have been applied to CE [1,2,43]. Based on their specificity, they can be divided into bulk property and specific property detectors [43]. Bulk-property detectors measure the difference in a physical property of a solute relative to the background. Examples of such detectors are conductivity, refractive index, indirect methods, etc. The specific-property detectors measure a physico-chemical property, which is inherent to the solutes, e.g. UV absorption, fluorescence emission, mass spectrum, electrochemical, etc. These detectors usually minimize background signals, have wider linear ranges and are more sensitive. In Table 17.3, a general overview is given of the detection methods that are employed in CE with their detection limits (absolute and relative). 

Fluorescence detection, because of the limited number of molecules that fluoresce under specific excitation and emission wavelengths, is a reasonable alternative if the analyte fluoresces. Likewise, amperometric detection can provide greater selectivity and very good sensitivity if the analyte is readily electrochemically oxidized or reduced. Brunt (37) recently reviewed a wide variety of electrochemical detectors for HPLC. Bulk-property detectors (i.e., conductometric and capacitance detectors) and solute-property detectors (i.e., amperometric, coulo-metric, polarographic, and potentiometric detectors) were discussed. Many flow-cell designs were diagrammed, and commercial systems were discussed. 

---