Effect Analysis Example

Because of the underlying statistical processes used with control charts, the safety manager can identify safety performance problems when they become statistically significant. The safety manager can also use control charts to implement continual improvement programs related to safety activities. 

---

FIGURE F.1 Failure mode and effects analysis example. (Software example courtesy of Dyadem.)... 

A risk assessment analyses systems at two levels. The first level defines the functions the system must perform to respond successfully to an accident. The second level identifies the hardware for the systems use. The hardware identification (in the top event statement) describes minimum system operability and system boundaries (interfaces). Experience shows that the interfaces between a frontline system and its support systems are important to the system cs aluaiion and require a formal search to document the interactions. Such is facilitated by a failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA). Table S.4.4-2 is an example of an interaction FMEA for the interlace and support requirements for system operation. 

Other important considerations in the design of an IRS are the data storage and analysis requirements. These need to be considered early in the design of the system if it is to be used to research and display trends effectively. For example, in addition to the answers to specific questions, the accident data analyst may wish to make use of free text descriptions of the circumstances of the accident. This implies that a text-based retrieval system will be required. 

Very specific forms of low pH localized corrosion may develop in large high heat-flux WT boilers. Where subsequent analysis work is undertaken, the results usually provide the basis for a traceable chain of cause and effect. An example of such a chain of cause and effect is detailed in an interesting corrosion case history provided by Maringer, Saavedra, Selby, and Haberman, and published by Tall Oaks Publishing, Inc. A synopsis is provided below (with kind permission of Tall Oaks Publishing). 

In order to associate a number to represent the utility of these four outcomes we have to choose between several types of economic evaluations, basically between cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis and cost-benefit analysis. The first of these is ruled out because it measures the health outcome in natural units. Given that the side effects of drags are of a varied nature, we need to be able to aggregate the different seriousness of these side effects in order to obtain a single utility, at least for the NSEA event. Furthermore, this utility must be comparable with that of, for example, the SER event. This is not possible with cost-effectivity. If we chose cost-utility, the utility associated with each event would be measured in QALYs gained or lost in each option. As QALYs are a universal measure of health benefit, cost-utility analysis could be appropriate for this type of decision. Lastly, cost-benefit analysis would also be appropriate, as it measures the utilities associated with each outcome in monetary terms, which reflect the willingness to pay for one of the outcomes in terms of safety and effectiveness. 

Of course the structural changes represented in Table 1 are much more complex than the simple bond angle plus electronic effect analysis reveals. For example, solvation of the carbene may depend on the details of its structure, and solvation undoubtedly influences chemical and physical properties (Langan et al., 1984). Nonetheless, it is possible to develop a good grasp of the most important properties of aromatic carbenes from the simple considerations described above. Before we proceed to examine these relationships in more detail, the carbene properties of interest must be identified, and the experimental procedures available for measurement of these properties must be critically considered. 

Quantitative analysis of Auger spectra is quite possible, but less straightforward than in XPS. The main reason is that the effective intensity of primary electrons in the sample may be higher than that of the primary beam, because of backscattering effects. For example, the Auger yield measured from a thin film of... 

These special analyses are prepared from the quantifiable risk analysis and a total risk scenario can be presented which depicts the estimated incident effects. An example is shown in Table 8. 

The PHA procedure can be conducted using various methodologies. For example, the checklist analysis discussed earlier is an effective methodology. In addition, Pareto analysis, relative ranking, pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA), change analysis, failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), fault tree analysis, event tree analysis, event and CF charting, PrHA, what-if analysis, and HAZOP can be used in conducting the PHA. 

Randomization If one is concerned about time-dependent effects (for example, analyzer response drift, or chemical aging effects in the calibration standards), then the order of preparation and analysis of calibration samples in the design should be randomized. 

The example above shows the severity of the problem that arises from the presence of mercury in natural gas. Not only is it necessary to determine the levels of mercury present, but also to remove the majority of the mercury prior to any contact with aluminium reactors. The latter of course, further compounds the problem, because if 90% or more of the mercury has been removed, then to determine the remaining mercury is even more difficult. An effective analysis system will he able to measure mercury in its organic and inorganic forms and to do so very quickly. If a mercury removal bed is losing its efficiency then it is imperative to stop the process as soon as possible. In addition, these systems are expensive to operate and it is uneconomic to switch to a new unit if the original still has some life left in it. 

Other examples of inductive tools that have limited application in incident investigation include failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), hazard and operability study (HAZOP), and event tree analysis (ETA). These are detailed in the CCPS book, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures... 

Propane Tank Root Cause Analysis Example -Propane Tank Cause and Effect Chart (CEC)... 

What aspects of chemical structure control the rate and mechanism by which a chemical reaction takes place Chemists have long sought good answers to this question, in terms of structure-reactivity correlations, both qualitative and quantitative. When chemists have analyzed the factors that affect reactivity, however, almost invariably the solvent has been, at first, regarded as a minor perturbation in the analysis. Unless there is some overwhelming effect, for example, the millionfold rate increase seen for some reactions such as ... 

The most common practice in cost-effectiveness analysis involving a drug is to use average wholesale price (AWP) as the measure of cost from a societal perspective. Here is a classic example. The well-regarded Gold et al. (1996) book on methods for cost-effectiveness analysis presents some worked examples of analysis done from a societal perspective. One is the study by Stinnett et al. (1996) on the cost effectiveness of dietary and pharmacologic therapy for cholesterol reduction. The authors stated that they use a societal perspective. 

An even less complex approach than cost-benefit or cost-effectiveness analysis would be simply to enumerate the costs involved in medical care and to ignore the outcomes that result from that care. This approach is known as cost-identification analysis. By performing cost-identification analysis, the researcher can determine alternative ways of providing a service. The analysis might be expressed in terms of the cost per unit of service provided. For example, a cost-identification study might measure the cost of a course of antibiotic treatment, but it would not calculate the clinical outcomes (cost-effectiveness... 

The filter material of choice is a thin teflon membrane since it minimizes artifact formation and maximizes analytical sensitivity by X-ray fluorescence analysis. Although X-ray fluorescence (XRF) may not be the only analytical technique used, it is generally accepted as being the most cost effective analysis for source apportionment. ( 2) Its background and therefore, analytical sensitivity, is dependent on the filters surface density. The analytical sensitivity of XRF for aerosols deposited on a stretched teflon membrane with a density of about 0.3 to 0.4 mg/cm, for example, is about three times greater than an aerosol deposited on a cellulose based filter with a surface density of about 4 mg/cm. This difference can be translated into either more information for the same analytical costs or the same information for a lower analysis cost. 

In a series of papers, Northrop (1981, 2001) clearly explained these difficulties with many examples based on the isotope effect analysis and suggested that the concept of rate-limiting step is "outmoded". Nevertheless, the main idea of limiting is so attractive that Northrop s arguments stimulated the search for modification and improvement of the main concept. 

An obvious approach to the problem of conformational analysis in these complexes is the use of NMR spectroscopy. However, several general problems immediately arise, namely, that most metal ions have nuclear spin, many are labile to substitution of the ligands, and they are frequently paramagnetic. In addition the ligands often contain N14. All these properties potentially hinder the observation of fine structure and thus the analysis of the NMR spectra. However, in some complexes the problems are either eliminated or reduced. For example Co(III) compounds are usually diamagnetic and inert to substitution, and in some complexes the ligand-proton fine structure is observed to be relatively uncomplicated by Co or N quad-rupole relaxation effects, for example, (CoEDTA)", Fig. 18. 

UG pairs provide a very small amount of stabilization to an RNA double helix, while the presence of unpaired bases has a destabilizing effect. The most stable hairpin loops contain four or five bases. Depending upon whether the loop is "closed" by CG or AU, the helix is destabilized by 20-30 kj/mol. "Bulge loops," which protrude from one side of a helix, have a smaller destabilizing effect. An example of the way in which Table 5-2 can be used to estimate the energies of formation of a loop in a straight-chain RNA is illustrated in Fig. 5-9. Similar analysis of base pairing in DNA can also be done.53 55... 

---