Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusivities structure effect

Theoretical models available in the literature consider the electron loss, the counter-ion diffusion, or the nucleation process as the rate-limiting steps they follow traditional electrochemical models and avoid any structural treatment of the electrode. Our approach relies on the electro-chemically stimulated conformational relaxation control of the process. Although these conformational movements179 are present at any moment of the oxidation process (as proved by the experimental determination of the volume change or the continuous movements of artificial muscles), in order to be able to quantify them, we need to isolate them from either the electrons transfers, the counter-ion diffusion, or the solvent interchange we need electrochemical experiments in which the kinetics are under conformational relaxation control. Once the electrochemistry of these structural effects is quantified, we can again include the other components of the electrochemical reaction to obtain a complete description of electrochemical oxidation. [Pg.374]

The interpretation of these unconventional conduction properties is still a challenge for condensed matter physicists. Several models have been proposed including thermally activated hopping [10] band structure effects due to small density of states and narrow pseudo-gap [11,12] or anomalous quantum diffusion [13,14]. Yet all these models are difficult to compare in a quantitative way with experiments. [Pg.536]

The reactivity of a surface depends on many factors. These include the adsorption energies of chemical species and their dissociation behavior, their diffusion on the surface, the adatom-adatom interactions, the active sites where a chemical reaction can occur, and the desorption behavior of a new chemical species formed on the surface. The site specificity depends on at least three factors the atomic configuration of the surface, the electronic structures of the surface, and the localized surface field. In atom-probe experiments, the desorption sites can be revealed by a timegated image of an imaging atom-probe as well as by an aiming study with a probe-hole atom-probe, the electronic structure effect of a chemical reaction can be investigated by the emitter material specificity, and the surface field can be modified by the applied field. [Pg.297]

Rejection of protein adsorption to the outermost grafted surface is attributed to a steric hinderance effect due to the tethered chains. A grafted surface in contact with an aqueous medium, a good solvent of the chains, has been identified to have a diffuse structure [57,151,152]. Reversible deformation of the tethered... [Pg.24]

The support has an internal pore structure (i.e., pore volume and pore size distribution) that facilitates transport of reactants (products) into (out of) the particle. Low pore volume and small pores limit the accessibility of the internal surface because of increased diffusion resistance. Diffusion of products outward also is decreased, and this may cause product degradation or catalyst fouling within the catalyst particle. As discussed in Sec. 7, the effectiveness factor Tj is the ratio of the actual reaction rate to the rate in the absence of any diffusion limitations. When the rate of reaction greatly exceeds the rate of diffusion, the effectiveness factor is low and the internal volume of the catalyst pellet is not utilized for catalysis. In such cases, expensive catalytic metals are best placed as a shell around the pellet. The rate of diffusion may be increased by optimizing the pore structure to provide larger pores (or macropores) that transport the reactants (products) into (out of) the pellet and smaller pores (micropores) that provide the internal surface area needed for effective catalyst dispersion. Micropores typically have volume-averaged diameters of 50 to... [Pg.25]

Diffusion or secondary structural effects during electrophoresis... [Pg.272]

The prediction of the parameter values for mass transport through porous materials is too difficult, because we do not know how to take into account the complicated pore geometry as it is in reality. Thus, data for the effective diffusivity or effective molecular and Knudsen diffusivities and the permeability are still more accurately determined experimentally. Experiments of this kind also provide valuable information on the porous structure, such as the average pore size and pore size distribution. [Pg.81]

In general, for each acid HA, the HA-(H20) -Wm model reaction system (MRS) comprises a HA (H20) core reaction system (CRS), described quantum chemically, embedded in a cluster of Wm classical, polarizable waters of fixed internal structure (effective fragment potentials, EFPs) [27]. The CRS is treated at the Hartree-Fock (HF) level of theory, with the SBK [28] effective core potential basis set complemented by appropriate polarization and diffused functions. The W-waters not only provide solvation at a low computational cost they also prevent the unwanted collapse of the CRS towards structures typical of small gas phase clusters by enforcing natural constraints representative of the H-bonded network of a surface environment. In particular, the structure of the Wm cluster equilibrates to the CRS structure along the whole reaction path, without any constraints on its shape other than those resulting from the fixed internal structure of the W-waters. [Pg.389]

Rates of reaction between acids and hydroxyl ions are found to follow a similar pattern to rates of reaction between bases and hydrogen ions, in that they are diffusion-controlled on condition that the bond being formed is stronger than the bond being broken, and there are no complicating factors. Variations in the rate coefficients can be explained in terms of steric effects, ionic charge effects, solvent structure effects and intramolecular hydrogen-bond effects. A short list of rate coefficients for... [Pg.211]

There are three basic distinct types of phenomena that may be responsible for intrinsic instabilities of premixed flames with one-step chemistry body-force effects, hydrodynamic effects and diffusive-thermal effects. Cellular flames—flames that spontaneously take on a nonplanar shape—often have structures affected most strongly by diffusive-thermal... [Pg.349]

For the SCR of NO with propane, that is in the absence of diffusion limiting structural effects, Cu-Al-MCM-41 (Si/Al=30) catalyst results substantially less active and selective than Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst with similar Cu content and Si/Al atomic ratio. Moreover, the presence of extra-framework aluminium lowers the selectivity to CO2. These results indicate that Cu-Al-MCM-41 catalysts are not suitable for NO SCR reactions with hydrocarbons. [Pg.584]

The presence of a static encephalopathy (defined as focal or diffuse structural brain lesions associated with mild to moderately severe cognitive dysfunction) was associated with a greater risk of toxicity after rapid switch-over to a carbamazepine dosage designed to yield a plasma concentration of 10 pg/ml (76). Moderately severe to severe adverse effects in the 11 patients in either subgroup included sedation, ataxia, and confusion. [Pg.633]

These results hence show that grafting leads to the preservation of the zeolitic structure under acidic conditions, probably by means of both hydrophobic and diffusion limitation effects. [Pg.292]


See other pages where Diffusivities structure effect is mentioned: [Pg.538]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.2398]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.538]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.268 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion effective

Diffusion effects diffusivity

Effective diffusivities

Effective diffusivity

Structural diffusion

© 2024 chempedia.info