Differential scanning calorimetry polymers

Richardson, S.J. 1989. Contribution of proton exchange to the oxygen-17 nuclear magnetic resonance transverse relaxation rate in water and starch-water systems. Cereal Chem. 66, 244-246. Richardson, M.J. and Saville, N.G. 1975. Derivation of accurate glass transition temperatures by differential scanning calorimetry. Polymer 16, 753-757. 

Stoliarov, S. I. and Walters R. N. (2008) Determination of the heats of gasification of polymers using differential scanning calorimetry, Polymer Degradation and Stability 93(2)422-427. 

T Hatakeyama, K Nakamura, H Hatakeyama. Smdies on heat capacity of ceUulose and lignin by differential scanning calorimetry. Polymer 23 1801-1804, 1982. 

Feng L, Bian X, Li G, Chen Z, Cui Y, Chen X. Determination of ultra-low glass transition temperature via differential scanning calorimetry. Polymer Test 2013 32 (8) 1368-1372. Flory PJ. On the morphology of the crystalline state in polymers. J Am Chem Soc 1962 84 (15) 2857-2867. 

Orrah, D. J. Semiyen, J. A. Dodgson, K. Ross-Murphy, S. B., Studies of Cyclic and Linear Poly(dimethylsiloxanes) 23. Low Temperature Behaviour as Studied by Dynamic Oscillatory Shear Viscometry and Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Polymer 1986, 28, 985-988. 

Solarski S, Ferreira M, Devaux E. Characterization of the thermal properties of PLA fibers by modulated differential scanning calorimetry. Polymer 2005 46 11187-92. 

Vasanthan, N., Ly, O., 2009. Effect of microstructure on hydrolytic degradation studies of poly(L-lactic acid) by FTIR spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 94, 1364-1372. 

Evans, C.M. and Torkelson, J.M. (2012) Determining multiple component glass transition temperatures in miscible polymer blends Comparison of fluorescence spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Polymer, 53 (26), 6118-6124. 

Induction time and later degradation of outdoor exposed poiypropylene cast film studied by differential scanning calorimetry. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 85 (1997), p. 199-207... 

Glass-transition temperatures are commonly determined by differential scanning calorimetry or dynamic mechanical analysis. Many reported values have been measured by dilatometric methods however, methods based on the torsional pendulum, strain gauge, and refractivity also give results which are ia good agreement. Vicat temperature and britde poiat yield only approximate transition temperature values but are useful because of the simplicity of measurement. The reported T values for a large number of polymers may be found ia References 5, 6, 12, and 13. 

The compositional distribution of ethylene copolymers represents relative contributions of macromolecules with different comonomer contents to a given resin. Compositional distributions of PE resins, however, are measured either by temperature-rising elution fractionation (tref) or, semiquantitatively, by differential scanning calorimetry (dsc). Table 2 shows some correlations between the commercially used PE characterization parameters and the stmctural properties of ethylene polymers used in polymer chemistry. 

Thermal analysis iavolves techniques ia which a physical property of a material is measured agaiast temperature at the same time the material is exposed to a coatroUed temperature program. A wide range of thermal analysis techniques have been developed siace the commercial development of automated thermal equipment as Hsted ia Table 1. Of these the best known and most often used for polymers are thermogravimetry (tg), differential thermal analysis (dta), differential scanning calorimetry (dsc), and dynamic mechanical analysis (dma). 

Common examples of the high Tg macromers are based on polystyrene or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) polymers of sufficiently high molecular weight to have a high T (typically on the order of 70-100°C as measured by differential scanning calorimetry) and also to make them immiscible with the acrylic polymer backbone once the solvent or heat has been removed. Typical molecular weight of the polystyrene or PMMA macromers is on the order of 5000-10,000 Da. Their generic structure can be pictured as in Fig. 13 (shown there for polystyrene). 

The SCB distribution (SCBD) has been extensively studied by fractionation based on compositional difference as well as molecular size. The analysis by cross fractionation, which involves stepwise separation of the molecules on the basis of composition and molecular size, has provided information of inter- and intramolecular SCBD in much detail. The temperature-rising elution fractionation (TREE) method, which separates polymer molecules according to their composition, has been used for HP LDPE it has been found that SCB composition is more or less uniform [24,25]. It can be observed from the appearance of only one melt endotherm peak in the analysis by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (Fig. 1) [26]. Wild et al. [27] reported that HP LDPE prepared by tubular reactor exhibits broader SCBD than that prepared by an autoclave reactor. The SCBD can also be varied by changing the polymerization conditions. From the cross fractionation of commercial HP LDPE samples, it has been found that low-MW species generally have more SCBs [13,24]. 

The modified NBR samples were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry [11,78-80,98]. The glass-transition temperature (T ) decreased with the level of hydrogenation. In the case of HFNBR, Tg increased with an increase in the addition of aldehyde groups to the polymer chain. Thermogravimetric analysis of the modified polymers have also been carried out [15]. 

Many papers deal with the crystallization of polymer melts and solutions under the conditions of molecular orientation achieved by the methods described above. Various physical methods have been used in these investigations electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, birefringence, differential scanning calorimetry, etc. As a result, the properties of these systems have been described in detail and definite conclusions concerning their structure have been drawn (e.g.4 13 19,39,52)). 

ADMET polymers are easily characterized using common analysis techniques, including nuclear magnetic resonance ( H and 13C NMR), infrared (IR) spectra, elemental analysis, gel permeation chromatography (GPC), vapor pressure osmometry (VPO), membrane osmometry (MO), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The preparation of poly(l-octenylene) (10) via the metathesis of 1,9-decadiene (9) is an excellent model polymerization to study ADMET, since the monomer is readily available and the polymer is well known.21 The NMR characterization data (Fig. 8.9) for the hydrogenated versions of poly(l-octenylene) illustrate the clean and selective nature of ADMET. 

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) are also very useful tools for the characterization of polymers. TGA and DSC provide die information about polymer stability upon heating and thermal behaviors of polymers. Most of the polymers syndiesized via transition metal coupling are conjugated polymers. They are relatively stable upon heating and have higher Tgs. 

FIGURE 31.2 Plots of crystalline melting point, heat of fusion and percent crystallinity of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) samples versus (a) radiation dose (b) trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate (TMPTMA) level from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) studies. (From Datta, S.K., Bhowmick, A.K., Chaki, T.K., Majali, A.B., and Deshpande, R.S., Polymer, 37, 45, 1996. With permission.)... 

---