Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Detection limits molecular absorption

Table 8.80 shows the present status of speciation methodology. For trace-metal speciation, atomic absorption detectors feature a relatively high absolute detection limit (10 pg level), as compared to the 0.1 to 1 pg sensitivity level for molecular ion MS techniques as well as for MIP-AES. The detection limit of LEI-ToFMS is in the attogram range. Speciation has been reviewed [550]. Various monographs deal with speciation analysis [542,551,552]. [Pg.676]

A molecular absorption spectrophotometry method, using a sharp-line irradiation source, has been developed for the determination of sulfide (as hydrogen sulfide) in water and sludge samples. The method was tested with measurements of real waste-water samples. The limit of detection was 0.25 g (1-10 mL sample volume). [Pg.164]

Thus, the region 2100-1830 cm 1 can be covered. This allows us to monitor CO(v,J) by resonance absorption and various M(CO)n [n = 3-6] as a result of near coincidences between the CO laser lines and the carbonyl stretching vibrations of these species. The temporal response of the detection system is ca. 100 ns and is limited by the risetime of the InSb detector. Detection limits are approximately 10 5 torr for CO and M(CO)n. The principal limitation of our instrumentation is associated with the use of a molecular, gas discharge laser as an infrared source. The CO laser is line tuneable laser lines have widths of ca. lO cm 1 and are spaced 3-4 cm 1 apart. Thus, spectra can only be recorded point-by-point, with an effective resolution of ca. 4 cm 1. As a result, band maxima (e.g. in the carbonyl stretching... [Pg.104]

Horwitz claims that irrespective of the complexity found within various analytical methods the limits of analytical variability can be expressed or summarized by plotting the calculated mean coefficient of variation (CV), expressed as powers of two [ordinate], against the analyte level measured, expressed as powers of 10 [abscissa]. In an analysis of 150 independent Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) interlaboratory collaborative studies covering numerous methods, such as chromatography, atomic absorption, molecular absorption spectroscopy, spectrophotometry, and bioassay, it appears that the relationship describing the CV of an analytical method and the absolute analyte concentration is independent of the analyte type or the method used for detection. [Pg.483]

The base promotes the formation of a phenolate ion, which undergoes a one-electron oxidation to form Cu(I) and a phenoxy radical. Two of these radicals combine to give the 4,4/-dihydroxybiphenyl compound, which can be further dehydrogenated to give the diphenoquinone. Within the detection limit of atomic absorption spectroscopy no Cu was observed in solution. Cu retention on the molecular sieve in this case is favored by the apolarity of the solvent, the absence of competing anions (e.g., acetate in solution), and the presence of base, with the latter promoting formation of copper hydroxides. [Pg.35]

The use of chiral mobile phases has both advantages and disadvantages. For example, the multiple equilibria occurring in the mobile phase and in the stationary phase complicates elucidation of the separation mechanism. The presence of the chiral mobile phase additive can also complicate detection. For instance, additives with relatively high UV absorbance decrease the detection limit of the separated enantiomers when using UV detection. Furthermore, resolved enantiomers enter in the detector cell in the form of complexes with the chiral resolving ligand. These complexes are diastereomers and therefore may differ in molecular absorptivity, as well as other properties. As a consequence, it is necessary to have a separate calibration curve for each enantiomer. [Pg.1032]

Fluorescence. The use of molecular fluorescence spectroscopy for the quantitation of enzyme reaction products has resulted in detection limits that are several orders of magnitude lower than those achieved by standard absorbance methods. At low analyte concentrations, fluorescence emission intensity is directly proportional to concentration, and its value depends on both the molar absorptivity of the analyte at the excitation wavelength, and the fluorescence quantum yield of the analyte, under the assay conditions. [Pg.49]

HPLC analysis also reveals additional molecular species which can hardly be discovered on the basis of the crude electronic spectrum of mixture of polyynes. As discussed previously [33—36], we have also identified polyynes with = 2 and 3, again on the basis of comparison with literature data. The detection of members of the polyynes series with = 1 and 2 is not very easy with HPLC analysis using the wavelengths selected and the spectral window available from our instrument (see Section 18.2.2). In fact, acetylene has its maximum absorption at 152nm followed by a moderate transition at 182 nm and by a very weak absorption at 220 nm. The first two bands are beyond the detection limits of our DAD, while the transition at 220 nm can be detected only if considerable concentrations of acetylene are present in solution, which is not the case. In the gas phase diacetylene also has its strongest absorption band at 165 nm, again beyond the detection limits of our instrument. We have used other weaker bands for identification of this molecule. [Pg.166]

The choice of an analytical method depends on its performance characteristics (detection limits, accuracy and precision, speed etc). Other conditions to be reached are the concerned element, the concentration in the sample of interest, the variability of their concentration. The concentration of metal ions in studied Seaside Lakes were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) (Chirila et al., 2003a), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) (Chirila et al., 2002), molecular absorption spectrometry in visible (Chirila and Carazeanu, 2001). These investigations were carried out in the biotope (sediment and water) and biocenosis (different plants and fish) from one ecosystem (Tabacarie Lake) and in water samples from the other Seaside lakes. [Pg.209]

With these electrodes detection limits of about 10" mole/1 (column outlet) could be obtained. Taking into account a molecular weight of 100 and the usual dilution within the column (factor 3-10), concentrations in samples of 10 ppm can be analysed selectively with 1.0% precision. It is noteworthy that the detection limits are lower than those obtained in batch measurement in normal d.c. polaro-graphy. The same phenomenon, better detection limits in flow systems, is observed with UV absorption measurement absorbance values more precise than 0.001 a.u. can hardly be obtained in batch measurements, but in the combination with LC, it is coimion to work at 0.01 a.u. full scale with one Scale division noise. The current yield of this DME device is approximately 1%, corresponding to a diffusion-layer thickness of about 10 pm. Recent work with the DME was described by 24... [Pg.139]

Nevertheless, the detection limits with these devices are Impressive. With a noise level of 100 pA and a 50% yield, both of which can very easily be obtained, the detection limit in mass flow of an analyte reacting with k = 2 is (100%/50%)(1/2 10 10 ° = 10" mole/sec with a flow-rate of 10 ul/sec this corresponds to a 10" M.solution. A 100-pg amount of analyte in a peak volume of lOO pi will give a 5-10"9 M solution with a molecular weight of 200. For comparison, a UV detection system, even in favourable instances with a molar absorptivity of 10 1 mole cm and a noise level of 10 a.u. would need a 10" M solution for a signal equal in magnitude to the noise. [Pg.143]


See other pages where Detection limits molecular absorption is mentioned: [Pg.388]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.553]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.457]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.789 ]




SEARCH



Absorption molecular

Detectable limit

Detection limits

Detection limits, limitations

Detection-limiting

Molecular limitations

© 2024 chempedia.info