Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Define Process Safety Objectives

If these questions do not have satisfying answers, the organization may wish to modify its objectives. These examples describe different vantage points to use in assessing objectives for the process safety system and should play a role in defining the metrics system objectives. [Pg.66]

Successful and effective implementation of a process safety metrics system is done by first defining the structure for the system. The structure or framework includes how data is collected, analyzed, and shared with the organization. The framework defined in this section will add more detail to the overall objectives and goals earlier in the chapter and will provide a foundation for the analysis conducted in the next section of this chapter. [Pg.80]

For instance, many objectives and data collection similarities exist between the mechanical integrity (MI) system and the process safety metrics system, and data available in the MI system can be used to judge process safety performance. How information from the MI system will be captured and used needs to be defined, including who will be responsible for ensuring the proper information flow. This requires the metrics system developers to coordinate with the MI personnel regarding what information will be monitored and how it will be... [Pg.86]

Metrics alone will not improve process safety. Data must be collected, analyzed, communicated, understood, and acted upon. Management s visible responses to identified problems are as important as, if not more important than, the metrics themselves. Objectives may be defined and responsibilities assigned, yet a lack of management follow-up will undermine focus and weaken commitments. Company leadership must be committed to process safety performance. A demonstrated commitment to process safety by an organization s senior leadership is essential. [Pg.132]

Processes and functional requirements must be reviewed before they are issued to the design consultant. The objective of the review, or in some cases multiple reviews, should be to ensure that processes and functions have been completely and accurately defined and that performance criteria are imam-biguous. Reviews must also determine the consequence of function failure, that is, the risk to the research study, manufacturing process, safety and regulatory compliance. These consequences must be documented so that the delivered solution is appropriate to the business risk, i.e., the design must be relevant to the operating context of the asset. [Pg.188]

Does the process safety program have clearly defined target and objectives—including dates when these will be met—and are the employees familiar with these targets... [Pg.572]

Objectives It is important not to confuse S/W assurance standards (such as RTCA/DO-178/ED-12B) with S/W development and lifecycle standards (such as MIL-STD-498, DoD-STD-2167A and IEEE12207). S/W assurance standards define objectives that should be satisfied to provide confidence in the behaviour of the S/W with respect to safety objectives. S/W development standards are more synonymous with a shopping Ust of documentation, activities and processes that S/W developers might use to undertake S/W. However, unUke assurance standards, development standards are not outcome or objective based. For example, a S/W development (or sometimes called a S/W lifecycle standard) might identify unit testing as a relevant technique, whereas a S/W assurance standard would instead provide an objective that provides a measure of when sufficient unit testing has been completed. [Pg.198]

The team that developed Process Safety Research for the 2Century expressed the elusive nature of understanding process safety culture in these words. "The safety culture of an organization has a significant impact on its safety performance. Although the level of safety culture of a work community can be subjectively observed immediately after entering that community, an objective measure is difficult to define. Moreover, establishing effective improvement, if needed is not an easy task... [6]. ... [Pg.429]

K is felt that a certification program should be directed to those involved in the application of nuclear criticality s ety principles to plant processes. In Bits connection, it is necessary to define the principal objectives and qualifications for certification in nuclear safety. Otherwise, it is felt by some that a regulatory agency will eventually establish its own criteria. [Pg.285]

Our discussion group did, however, agree that we should try to develop objective, process-based measures for our quality—or safety—objectives. Although we cannot measure every important process directly, defining and tracking desired actions or behaviors guide proper procedures and motivate continuous improvement. In other words, the quote from Hansen (1994) at the start of this chapter is accurate, but it does not say it all. Many factors affect performance. Not only is it impossible to monitor all of them, it is often impossible to identify the specific change in performance that led to an improved system. [Pg.442]

The first major objective for the inherent safety review is the development of a good understanding of the hazards involved in the process. Early understanding of these hazards provides time for the development team to implement recommendations of the inherent safety effort. Hazards associated with flammability, pressure, and temperature are relatively easy to identify. Reactive chemistry hazards are not. They are frequently difficult to identify and understand in the lab and pilot plant. Special calorimetry equipment and expertise are often necessary to fully characterize the hazards of runaway reactions and decompositions. Similarly, industrial hygiene and toxicology expertise is desirable to help define and understand health hazards associated with the chemicals employed. [Pg.117]


See other pages where Define Process Safety Objectives is mentioned: [Pg.61]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.1180]    [Pg.1906]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.757]    [Pg.778]    [Pg.117]   


SEARCH



Process Objectives

Safety defined

Safety objectives

© 2024 chempedia.info