Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Control particulate matter removal

Baghouses are preferred over venturi scrubbers for controlling particulate matter emissions from loading and pushing operations because of the higher removal efficiencies. ESPs are effective for final tar removal from coke oven gas. Stack air emissions should be monitored continuously for particulate matter. Alternatively, opacity measurements of stack gases can suffice. Fugitive emissions should be monitored annually for VOCs. [Pg.74]

HEPA filter performance for the removal of radioactive particulate matter in the ventilation system hot exhaust is ensured by means of administratively controlled TSR surveillance activities. HEPA filters are subject to periodic pressure drop testing to verity operability (i.e., to verify that the filters are not plugged). They are also subject to periodic efficiency testing to verify the required level of particulate matter removal efficiency. HEPA filters are to be replaced, In accordance with operating procedures, when they become plugged or when the required efficiency can no longer be achieved. [Pg.327]

Air pollution control systems using wet scrubbers will remove some water-soluble gases, but the removal of particulate matter is the primary concern for a control system. The air pollution control system, therefore, is usually a single device such as a wet scrubber, small-diameter multiple cyclones, fabric filters, or ESPs. The multicyclones are the least expensive system and the ESPs the most expensive. [Pg.496]

A pesticide formulation plant should prepare and implement an emergency preparedness and response plan that takes into account neighboring land uses and the potential consequences of an emergency or accidental release of harmful substances. Measures to avoid the release of harmful substances should be incorporated in the design, operation, maintenance, and management of the plant. Pollution control equipment employed in this sector include baghouses for removal of particulate matter and carbon adsorption for removal of VOCs. [Pg.70]

Many compounds can cause problems in pollutant-control equipment. Particulate matter, liquids, or solids in the waste stream can plug the adsorber beds, heat-recovery beds in regenerative thermal incinerator systems and biofilters. Conventional filtration systems are used to remove particulate matter before or after the process. [Pg.1253]

In the selection of control equipment, the most important waste-gas characteristics are volumetric flow rate, concentration and composition of organic compounds in the waste-gas, waste-gas temperature and humidity, and rbe content of particulate matter, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and toxic pollutants. Other factors influencing the equipment selection are the required removal efficiency, recovery requirements, investment and operating costs, ease of installation, and considerations of operation and maintenance. The selection of a suitable control method is based on the fundamental selection criteria presented as well as the special characteristics of the project. [Pg.1266]

Exhaust rate The controlled quantity of air, gases, vapors, and particulate matter that is removed from a space or process. [Pg.1436]

Ash particles produced in coal combustion are controlled by passing the flue gases through electrostatic precipitators. Since most of the mass of particulate matter is removed by these devices, ash received relatively little attention as an air pollutant until it was shown that the concentrations of many toxic species in the ash particles increase as particle size decreases. Particle removal techniques become less efiective as particle size decreases to the 0.1-0.5 pm range, so that particles in this size range that escape contain disproportionately high concentrations of toxic substances. [Pg.129]

Lab grade hematite (Fe203) and copper sulfate (anhydrous and hydrated) were mounted on slides and used as controls to compare to mineral deposits that might have been found adhering to foe fibers. Rabbit hair and milkweed that had been colored with an aqueous hematite solution and with an aqueous copper sulfate (blue vitriol) solution were also used for comparison. Fibers removed from each simulated material were mounted in water (Refractive Index (Rl) of 1.0), and in Permount (Fisher Scientific) (RI of 1.55). The collected particulate matter and fibers removed from foe yam samples were similarly mounted and examined using optical microscopy. [Pg.34]


See other pages where Control particulate matter removal is mentioned: [Pg.2400]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.2155]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.2992]    [Pg.2404]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.956]    [Pg.1328]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.1653]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.1699]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.45]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.462 , Pg.463 , Pg.464 , Pg.465 , Pg.466 , Pg.467 , Pg.468 , Pg.469 , Pg.470 , Pg.471 , Pg.472 , Pg.496 ]




SEARCH



Control removal

Particulate control

Particulate matter

Particulate matter control

Particulate matter removal

Particulate removal

© 2024 chempedia.info