Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Conductance measurements interpretation

Electromagnetic (EM) Conductivity Measures the electrical conductivity of materials in microohms over a range of depths determined by the spacing and orientation of the transmitter and receiver coils, and the nature of the earth materials. Delineates areas of soil and groundwater contamination and the depth to bedrock or buried objects. Surveys to depths of SO to 100 ft are possible. Power lines, underground cables, transformers and other electrical sources severely distort the measurements. Low resistivities of surficial materials makes interpretation difficult. The top layers act as a shunt to the introduction of energy info lower layers. Capabilities for defining the variation of resistivity with depth are limited. In cases where the desired result is to map a contaminated plume in a sand layer beneath a surficial clayey soil in an area of cultural interference, or where chemicals have been spilled on the surface, or where clay soils are present it is probably not worth the effort to conduct the survey. [Pg.124]

Despite the results from various experiments such as transference number measurements, polarographic studies, spectroscopic measurements, and dielectric relaxation studies in addition to conductivity measurements, unilateral triple-ions remain a matter of debate. For experimental examples and other hypotheses for the interpretation of conductance minima the reader is referred to Ref. [15] and the literature cited there. [Pg.469]

All the same, lasting credit is due to Hantzsch for refuting the proposals, made so often since 1894, to interpret the isomerism of diazo derivatives using other than stereochemical arguments. For his purpose Hantzsch used the methods of physical chemistry, such as conductivity measurements and spectroscopy, at a time when these were most unusual in the organic field. [Pg.144]

The combination of photocurrent measurements with photoinduced microwave conductivity measurements yields, as we have seen [Eqs. (11), (12), and (13)], the interfacial rate constants for minority carrier reactions (kn sr) as well as the surface concentration of photoinduced minority carriers (Aps) (and a series of solid-state parameters of the electrode material). Since light intensity modulation spectroscopy measurements give information on kinetic constants of electrode processes, a combination of this technique with light intensity-modulated microwave measurements should lead to information on kinetic mechanisms, especially very fast ones, which would not be accessible with conventional electrochemical techniques owing to RC restraints. Also, more specific kinetic information may become accessible for example, a distinction between different recombination processes. Potential-modulation MC techniques may, in parallel with potential-modulation electrochemical impedance measurements, provide more detailed information relevant for the interpretation and measurement of interfacial capacitance (see later discus-... [Pg.460]

Both the reactors are operated in batch, and the concentrations of components involved are measured online by electro-conductivity. Data interpretation is made by the kinetic equation of second order. The results obtained in the range of 25-45"C are given in Table 3. Again, the values for the rate constant measured in SCISR, ks, are S5 tematically higher than those in STR, ksr, by about 20%, and no significant difference betvi een the values for the active energy measured in SCISR and STR has been found. [Pg.536]

From his conductivity measurements on solutions, Arrhenius concluded that strong electrolytes are not exceptions. Instead they dissociate into ions. When z = 2, it meant that each solute species dissociated to give two ions. A compound with Z = 3 dissociated to give three ions. Moreover, interpreting the results of his experiments at varying levels of concentration, Arrhenius concluded that at sufficiently high dilution, every electrolyte becomes fully dissociated. [Pg.1225]

The role of ion-pairs is discussed at some length. Conductivity measurements on polymerised solutions of EVE with successive dilutions gave results from which ion-pair dissociation constants KD were calculated conventionally by means of Shedlovsky plots. However, since the conductivity of solutions of the model system EtOCHMe+ SbCl6" can be interpreted much more plausibly in terms of a BIE (Plesch and Stannett, 1982),... [Pg.550]

The determination of accurate and precise limiting conductivities and ion association constants requires care in the design and use of the conductance apparatus, and in the purification and handling of solvents and salts. For this reason attention is given initially here to experimental aspects of conductance measurements. This is followed by a tabulation of selected data, primarily in dipolar apro-tic solvents, and a brief discussion of data taken in one solvent, acetonitrile, which is intended to show the scope of interpretation possible at the present time. [Pg.5]

Several techniques are available for thermal conductivity measurements, in the steady state technique a steady state thermal gradient is established with a known heat source and efficient heat sink. Since heat losses accompany this non-equilibrium measurement the thermal gradient is kept small and thus carefully calibrated thermometers and heat source must be used. A differential thermocouple technique and ac methods have been used. Wire connections to the sample can represent a perturbation to the measurement. Techniques with pulsed heat sources (including laser pulses) have been used in these cases the dynamic response interpretation is more complicated. [Pg.656]

As we shall see, the solution conductivity depends on the ion concentration and the characteristic mobility of the ions present. Therefore, conductivity measurements of simple, one-solute solutions can be interpreted to indicate the concentration of ions (as in the determination of solubility or the degree of dissociation) or the mobility of ions (as in the investigations of the degree of solvation, complexation, or association of ions). In multiple-solute solutions, the contribution of a single ionic solute to the total solution conductivity cannot be determined by conductance measurements alone. This lack of specificity or selectivity of the conductance parameter combined with the degree of tedium usually associated with electrolytic conductivity measurements has, in the past, discouraged the development of conductometry as a widespread electroanalyti-cal technique. Today, there is a substantial reawakening of interest in the practical applications of conductometry. Recent electronic developments have resulted in automated precision conductometric instrumentation and applications... [Pg.237]

Interpretation of the optimum metal content for these reactions. As already mentioned an optimum Pt content was found for dehydrogenation of liquid alcohols and cyclopentane-deuterium exchange in gas phase. Also, with Pt/Ti02 samples which had not been preoxidized and which were accordingly non-stoichiometric according to conductivity measurements, the same optimum content was found for the initial rate of OIE, whereas this rate decreased as a function of Pt content for preoxidized samples (44). [Pg.38]

The conductivity measurements of the films of 39, 40, 39a, and 40a in Fig. 10, which were carried out in the temperature range 290 176 K, suggested the presence of only one conduction mechanism. The conduction behavior of 39 and 40 could be interpreted as the usual Arrhenius type. It was observed that the insertion of alkali metals increased the dc conductivity. The order of conductivities observed for these... [Pg.132]

The best-developed way to measure the association of ions is through the measurement of electrical conductance of dilute solutions. As mentioned, this realization occurred in the nineteenth century to Arrhenius and Ostwald. An elaborate development of conductance equations suitable to a range of ion concentrations of millimolar and lower by many authors (see Refs. 5, 33 and 34 for critical reviews) has made the determination of association constants common. Unfortunately, in dealing with solutions this dilute, the presence of impurities becomes very difficult to control and experimenters should exercise due caution, since this has been the source of many incorrect results. For example, 20 ppm water corresponds to 1 mM water in PC solution, so the effect of even small contaminants can be profound, especially if they upset the acid-base chemistry of association. The interpretation of these conductance measurements leads, by least squares analysis of the measurements, to a determination of the equivalent conductance at infinite dilution, Ao, the association constant for a positively and negatively charged ion pair, KA, and a distance of close approach, d, using a conductance equation of choice. One alternative is to choose the Bjerrum parameter for the distance, which is defined by... [Pg.86]

In some cases it is possible to estimate the fraction of solvent-separated ion pairs in equilibrium with contact ion pairs and free ions (37, 43), but conductance measurements yield values for Kd only. For most cationic (32) and anionic (37) polymerizations it is now clear that the reactivity of free ions is several orders of magnitude greater than that of corresponding ion pairs. Consequently, it is necessary to know Kd to be able to interpret correctly the reactivity in any ionic polymerization. Table I shows values of Kd for typical stable organic cations. [Pg.335]

The existence of Sn(I) may be inferred from reports of the reactions of H and e q with Sn022 , SnF3 , and certain complexes of Sn(II) (14a, 14b). However, rather little is known of these species. The chemistry of Sn(III) is better documented. As summarized by Cannon, this oxidation state is frequently found for intermediates in reactions of Sn(II) with one-electron oxidants (77). Asmus et al. generated Sn(III) in a pulse radiolysis study by reaction of OH with Sn(II) in an unspecified medium (18). By conductivity measurements over the range pH 3-2.5 they obtained data which were interpreted as hydrolysis according to... [Pg.115]


See other pages where Conductance measurements interpretation is mentioned: [Pg.517]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.778]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.1082]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.1519]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.195]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.557 ]




SEARCH



Conductance measurements

Conductance measurment

Conduction measurements

Conductivity measurements

© 2024 chempedia.info