Concentration units compared

The correct answer is (D). Choices (A), (B), and (C) are all based on weights, which do not change with changes in temperature. Molarity, on the other hand, is a concentration unit comparing mass per unit of volume. Because volume is affected by changes in temperature, molarity will be affected by temperature increase. 

Figure 5-2 shows schematically the dependence of the relative concentration of the diazo equilibrium forms on the pH (for the diazoanhydride mentioned in this figure see Sec. 5.2). The relative concentrations of the two major equilibrium forms, the diazonium ion and the diazoate ion, decrease on the right and left sides, respectively, of the pH value corresponding to equal concentrations of these two forms ([ArNj] = [ArN20-]). The gradients correspond to a factor of 100 per pH unit, compared with only 10 per pH unit in the case of dibasic Bronsted acids. The equilibrium concentrations of the diazohydroxide and the diazoanhydride (except for very reactive diazonium ions such as the benzene-1,4-bisdiazonium dication mentioned above) are very small at all pH values, with a maximum at pH = pKm. 

Enthalpy of activation, 10, 156-160 Entropy of activation, 10, 156-160 compared with AV, 169 concentration units and, 168 precision of, 168 Enzyme catalysis, 90-94 Equilibria, complexation, 145-148 Exchange reactions, kinetics of,... 

Relatively little contamination from PCBs was found in sediments from riverine and pothole wetlands at national wildlife refuges and waterfowl production areas (WPA) in the north central United States in 1980 to 1982. PCBs were above detection levels (20 pg/kg) in less than 4% of the sediments a similar case was recorded in fish from WPAs (Martin and Hartman 1985). Maximum total PCB concentrations in field collections of nonbiological materials were 0.000028 pg/kg in ice, 0.000125 pg/kg in snow, 12.3 pg/m3 in air, 233 pg/L in seawater, 3860 pg/L in sediment interstitial waters, and 1800 mg/kg in sediments. Concentrations were comparatively elevated in urban areas, near anthropogenic activities, and at known sites of PCB contamination (Table 24.8). 

Figure 3. Time course of Na+ binding to the exterior surface ( , gill and body combined) of 10 g rainbow trout compared with uptake into the entire plasma volume (O) or whole livers ( ) of the fish. Na+ uptake into the liver is also normalised to 0.325 g of fresh liver weight (A) to enable a direct comparison with the blood volume of the 10 g fish (0.325 ml, see Gingerich and Pityer [87]). Fish were dipped in 500 ml fresh water containing 0.2 mmol l 1Na+ and 10 p,Ci of 22Na+ (see [30] for other water-quality details), and then rinsed in 30 1 of unlabelled freshwater for 15 s to remove excess radio-isotope. Data are means S.E. (n = 6 fish). Note that Na+ measurements in/on tissues are absolute amounts in nmoles, not concentration units...

There is tolerable agreement between the values in Tables XVI and XVH, in such cases as direct or almost direct comparison is possible. Thus, for example, the Russian value of 48.52% by weight for the solubility of neodymium chloride at 30°C may be compared with 49.7% by Hinchey and Cobble, at 25°C. Indeed, if one follows the solubilities reported for neodymium chloride back to Matignon, the values at or near 25°C are all reasonably close together (178, 201, 205, 207, 258, 259). On the question of comparability, it may be remarked here that solubility comparisons are from time to time precluded by the preference of some authors for weight units, and of others for volume concentration units. When densities are also given, then of course interconversion is straightforward, but densities are by no means always available when needed. 

Figure 5. Fluorescence spectra of pyrene tagged novolac and free pyrene butyric acid (PBA) in diglyme. Spectra are labeled with percent of monomer units tagged. The pyrene concentration in solution is 1 x 10 bM, except in the inset where different pyrene concentrations are compared along with the spectra of a film containing the tagged polymer.

CAUTION Comparing k values between different types of reactions is an all-too-common mistake. Although we use the same letter k for both first-order and second-order rate constants, their units differ A first-order rate constant has units of [time]-1, while a second-order one has units of [time]-1 [concentration]-1. Comparing these two numbers is like comparing apples and tomatoes - it is nonsense. This is also the reason why comparing the rate constants of a reaction with and without a catalyst is meaningless Consider, for example, the noncatalytic reaction A I B C that obeys the second-order rate law shown in Eq. (2.21). 

Analyses are performed in accordance with standardized methods issued under the responsibility of a Technical Committee within the Health Ministry. Usually such measurements rely on a comparison of the measured quantity in the unknown sample with the same quantity in a standard , i.e. an RM, according to a specific measurement equation [6], after calibrating the instrument. Calibration of a photometric system for clinical analyses usually means the set of operations that establish, under specific conditions, the relationship, within a specified range, between values indicated by the instrument and the corresponding values assigned to the RMs at the stated uncertainty. Calibration of the photometer itself implies the calibration of wavelength and absorbance scale by means of proper wavelength and absorbance RMs [5], traceable to national standards. A calibration of the instrument is still needed in concentration units to check the indicated provided value. The measurement result is then verified by application of that method of measurement to a certified reference material (CRM). Both the comparator - a photometric device with narrow or wide bandwidth, and the RMs should thus be validated. 

The rate of change of Tc is greater for propylammonium than for butylammonium 50 K per log unit compared with 14 K per log unit. This still corresponds to a change in surface potential of only a few millivolts, so the qualitative behavior is the same as in the butylammonium system, namely one of approximately constant surface potential with respect to electrolyte concentration. The quantitative difference between the two slopes was important for our purposes in that it enabled us to make d = 43.6 A gels under easily controllable conditions at c = 0.5 M, T = 4°C. 

In Table IV, equilibrium accumulated residues are presented for a larger range of constants and are compared with values obtained for comparable first-order kinetics. For these cases, the slow approach to limiting values can tax even the computer, and the values were therefore calculated by numerical approximation to that value of C for which the decrease in 1 year was just 1 concentration unit—i.e., the addition rate. 

The most important detector specification is probably detector sensitivity as it not only defines the minimum concentration of solute that can be detected but also allows the overall mass sensitivity of the chromatographic system to be calculated. The detector sensitivity also places a limit on the maximum (k ) (capacity factor) at which a solute can be eluted from a chromatographic column. In order to calculate the mass sensitivity or the maximum (k ) value, the detector sensitivity must be available in concentration units, e.g. g/ml. Moreover, if all detector sensitivities were given in units of g/ml, then all detecting devices, functioning on quite different principles, could then be rationally compared. 

Percent concentration is the simplest concentration unit. The amount of solute is compared to the amount of solution in order to measure concentration. This concentration unit is generally used for concentrated solutions of acids and bases. The percentage of solute can be expressed by mass or volume. 

In pore waters the dissolved T concentrations, which are higher than the total iodine concentration in seawater, can be observed with decomposition of particulate organic matter (e.g., Figure IB). In Figure IB the T pore-water concentrations are in micromolar units, compared to the total iodine concentration in seawater of <0.5 (jlM. Thus, the pore waters contain several times the amount of iodine that is found in seawater. Increased T concentrations and significant amounts of organic iodine are found in anoxic basins such as the Black Sea (29, 39, 40). 

He determined the number of moles of AgCl produced. This told him the number of CH ions precipitated per formula unit. The results are in the second column. Werner reasoned that the precipitated Cl ions must be free (uncoordinated), whereas the unprecipitated CH ions must be bonded to Pt so they could not be precipitated by Ag ions. He also measured the conductances of solutions of these compounds of known concentrations. By comparing these with data on solutions of simple electrolytes, he found the number of ions per formula unit. The results are shown in the third column. Piecing the evidence together, he concluded that the correct formulas are the ones listed in the last two columns. The NH3 and Cl within the brackets are bonded by coordinate covalent bonds to the Lewis acid, Pt(TV) ion. 

The solubilization process seems to be well understood on a qualitative basis. Quantitatively, however, there appears to be less agreement. First, in reporting the extent of solubilization different authors may use different definitions and concentration units, as we discuss later. Second, for a three-component system both the concentrations of the surfactant and the solute can be varied. This means that we rarely find data that are directly comparable due to variation in concentrations. Often solubilization is reported as single points along the concentration profiles of surfactant and solute. In some cases the method of measurement sets the limits. 

Concentration units can vary greatly. They express a ratio that compares an amount of the solute with an amormt of the solution or the solvent. For chemistry applications, the concentration term molarity is generally the most useful. Molarity is defined as the number of moles of solute per liter of solution. 

The constant is called the ionic product of the solvent and it is just the value that causes the difference in acidity (basicity) parameter units between solutions of strong acids and bases, whereas the pvalue itself defines the width of the acid-base range of an ionizing solvent. Let us proceed with consideration of Franklin s definition. So, a substance whose addition leads to increase of the concentration of l+ particles in the solution (it means automatically that concentration of r decreases) is referred to acids on the contrary, if addition of a substance causes reduction of l+ concentration as compared with its concentration in pure solvent, it should be classified among bases. 

Soil pH measurements can be ambiguous. Two factors that affect soil pH measurements are the soil-solution ratio and the salt concentration. Increasing either factor normally decreases the measured soil pH because H and A1 cations on or near soil colloid surfaces can be displaced by exchange with soluble cations. Once displaced into solution, the A1 ions can hydrolyze (Eq. 10.2) and further lower the pH. Preferential retention of hydroxy aluminium polymers by soil colloids drives the hydrolysis reactions further toward completion and leads to lower pH. Increasing the neutral salt concentration to 0.1 or 1 M can lower the measured soil pH as much as 0.5 to 1.5 units, compared to soil pH measured in distilled water suspensions. 

---