Components of Risk

There is a growing need to better characterize the health risk related to occupational and environmental exposure to pesticides. Risk characterization is a basic step in the assessment and management of the health risks related to chemicals (Tordoir and Maroni, 1994). Evaluation of exposure, which may be performed through environmental and biological monitoring, is a fundamental component of risk assessment. Biomarkers are useful tools that may be used in risk assessment to confirm exposure or to quantify it by estimating the internal dose. Besides their use in risk assessment, biomarkers also represent a fundamental tool to improve the effectiveness of medical and epidemiological surveillance. 

By decoupling risk response behavior into the separate components of risk perception and risk attitude, a more robust conceptualization and prediction of consumer reactions are possible. The insights that result from decoupling risk perceptions and risk attitudes can yield important implications. Consider the two following outcomes from a program of research by Pennings et al. (2002) ... 

The science policy components of risk assessment have led to what have come to be called default assumptions. A default is a specific, automatically applied choice, from among several that are available (in this case it might be, for example, a model for extrapolating animal dose-response data to humans), when such a choice is needed to complete some undertaking (e.g., a risk assessment). We turn in the next chapter to the conduct of risk assessment and the ways in which default assumptions are used under current regulatory guidelines. We might say we have arrived at the central subject of this book. 

The upper bound on lifetime risk can easily be estimated by multiplying the cancer potency by the number of dose units individuals are, or could be exposed to each day. This multiplication constitutes the quantitative component of risk characterization (Step 4) for carcinogens. That is, if potency has units of upper bound on lifetime risk per unit of dose, and we multiply it by number of dose units, the result is upper bound on lifetime risk. This is the mathematical form of what we are doing when we are reading the risk directly from Figure 8.1. 

Risk analysis and risk management play an important role in public policy. These debates range from the development of environmental impact statements for the location of buildings to debates on household lead abatement and what chemicals can be allowed in the food supply. Quality of life issues such as asthma and/or loss of mental function are now recognized as important components of risk assessment. 

In this first component of risk assessment, the question of causality in a qualitative sense in addressed that is, the degree to which evidence suggests that an agent elicits... 

Risk is generally considered as a product of the probability of an adverse effect and the magnitude of that effect. In ecotoxicology, risk depends on the probability and intensity of exposure and the sensitivity of the exposed organisms, whereby the interpretation of risk can involve aspects of space and time and value judgments (e.g., believing that 1 species is more important than another). The sensitivity is often determined in laboratory toxicity tests, in which dose- or concentration-effect curves are established. Extrapolation methods exist for both components of risk and the additional aspects. 

Extrapolations of the other significant components of risk assessment, measures of effects, are reviewed in Chapters 3 through 7, which present a hierarchical approach based on biological organization. Extrapolation of effect measures through (quantitative) structure-activity relationships (IQISARs) is often necessitated because... 

Hazard evaluation A component of risk evaluation that involves gathering and evaluating data on the types of health injuries or diseases that may be produced by a chemical and on the conditions of exposure under which such health effects are produced. 

Figure 10 The relationship between the three components of risk analysis (from WHO, 2005)...

WHO (2005) Relationship between the three components of risk analysis. Geneva, World Health Organization, Department of Food Safety, Zoonoses and Foodbome Diseases, 21 October (http //www.who.int/foodsafety/micro/3circles diagram color.jpg). 

Uncertainty Imperfect knowledge concerning the present or future state of the system under consideration a component of risk resulting from imperfect knowledge of the degree of hazard or of its spatial and temporal pattern of expression. 

COMPONENTS OF RISK MITIGATION - CONSIDERATION OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT... 

Components of Risk-Mitigation section above). Thus, it would be desirable... 

The US government s new approach (2000) to health assessment of agents involves the iterative interaction of four major components basic scientific research (hazard identification), science-based toxicity/risk assessment (dose-response assessment), exposure assessment, and risk characterization (Figure 2). This section relies heavily on the US EPA guidelines for the health assessment of suspect developmental toxicants which describe how the government uses, and plans to use, developmental toxicity data as part of their weight-of-evidence approach to both the hazard identification and the dose-response assessment components of risk assessment. 

Research is needed to explore the impacts of nanomaterials and nanomaterial production on the environment and public health. One framework for assessing these impacts is that of comparative risk assessment. Applied to an assessment of the production, use, and disposal of nanomaterials, a risk assessment typically considers both the potential for exposure to a given material and (once exposed) potential impacts such as toxicity or mutagenicity. The need to elucidate both of these components of risk in assessing the consequences of nanomaterials on the environment and public health is essential. 

Describe alternate methods to the simple quotient method for evaluating the spatial component of risk. 

Special regulatory provisions. European Economic Area (EEA). The components of risk management programs in Europe have been similar to those listed above. However, it is probably fair to say that, overall, there has been less experience with these programs in Europe than in the United States. 

Components of Risk Assistant. There are three main components of the Risk Assistant software system, each of which reflects a different approach to using the information contained in the system. Each segment makes use of the same family of program modules, but selects different subsets of these modules to address particular questions. 

Databases. The Database component of Risk Assistant allows the user to look up information directly in any of the databases, without using the analytical programs. These databases are automatically called up as necessary during Risk Assistant analyses, but a user may simply want to report specific information about a chemical or chemicals. The databases contained in the system are described below. 

Obviously, an important component of risk communication is if you do not know an answer or are uncertain, acknowledge it and do not hesitate to admit mistakes or disclose risk information. The Centers for Disease Control, to their credit, did admit they made mistakes about the information they supplied initially about anthrax, during the anthrax exposures to postal workers during October 2001. They stated that only workers who opened the letters contaminated with anthrax were at risk. It turned out that the spores could migrate out of the unopened letters, which ended up exposing other postal workers. 

Charlie Auer, former Director of the EPA s Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, made a presentation in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, on 30 October 2006 (Air and Waste Management Association) titled US Experience in Applying Informed Substitution as a Component of Risk Reduction and Alternative Analysis. In his presentation, Auer cited the use of highly fluorinated substances such as perfluorooctyl sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). He suggested that these substances... 

A risk analysis framework for food safety has been developed as an approach to assessing the relationship between potential hazards and the actual human health risks. The three components of risk analysis are assessment, management, and communication. 

Worker exposure data Is a major component of risk assessment for the use of agricultural chemicals. It has become a routine part of the product review and registration process for new chemicals. 

The estimate of exposure to workers Involved In the application of pesticides and to bystanders Is a critical component of risk assessment. The deficiencies of existing methods need to be... 

---