Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Aromatic-aliphatic interactions

Equation 39 clearly indicates the dependence of irx on the system R through the interaction variable and points to the origin of the variability in it is the result or the influence of the solvent on the interaction term between R and X. The second approximation which includes also the second order term Jr x S casts a serious doubt on the applicability of a universal ir scale which will adequately represent the effect of a substituent on the solvation process. However, individual ir scales derived from specific molecular systems (e.g., aromatic, aliphatic, etc.) or from procedures to separate ir from other effects (e.g., electronic, steric, etc.) could prove useful. [Pg.36]

Organochlorines Aromatic Aliphatic 105-103 Few polar moieties hydrophobic and Van der Wasls interaction induction effects substituents, non-conjug. double-bonds)... [Pg.19]

The CHARMm force field [20] was developed particularly for biological macromolecules, and has become a main force field for investigating biological systems. Kollman and co-workers [21,22] have fitted the benzene-cation interaction very accurately with fliree-body term force fields by including polarizability. Weaver and Donini [23] have also validated the applicability of CHARMm for benzene-cation interaction. Therefore, this study focuses on the aromatic-aliphatic, aromatic-aromatic, aromatic-amide(S), aromatic-amide(B), aromatic-thiol, aromatic-amine, and aromatic-alcohol interactions. [Pg.67]

As will be shown, the original CHARMm parameters can produce IPESs in good agreement with those calculated by the CP-corrected MP2 method for aromatic-aliphatic, aromatic-amide(S), and aromatic-amide(B) interactions. However, for aromatic-aromatic, aromatic-thiol, aromatic-amine, and aromatic-alcohol interactions, the original parameters cannot reproduce the IPESs which match CP-corrected MP2 results. Therefore, the Lennard-Jones parameters for the important atom pair in these four interactions were selected to be optimized. The original and optimized CHARMm Lennard-Jones parameters for these chosen atom pairs are collected in Table 1 for each of these four interactions. [Pg.75]

The parameter X12 in equation (3.77) is the sole adjustable parameter of the free volume theory when comparison is effected with experiment. The theory predicts that x increases with the segment fraction 2, as found experimentally for some systems (see Fig. 3.10). Values of A, 2 are always found to be positive and fall into two well-defined groups depending upon the chemical constitution of the polymer and the solvent. For aliphatic-aliphatic interactions, A, 2<10Jcm" whereas for aliphatic-aromatic interactions, Af,2 40Jcm". These relative magnitudes seem intuitively reasonable. [Pg.56]

This approach was further explored by Hakemi (2000) who prepared blends that contain both a wholly aromatic and an aromatic-aliphatic LCP that are miscible with each other. The ultimate goal of this approach was to develop multi-component blends that have components of thermoplastics. The miscible LCP blends could be useful as reinforcing agents for the thermoplastic matrix polymer and, due to the fact that the LCP s contain some of the components of the thermoplastic polymer, there is expected to be improved adhesion between the LCP portion and the matrix portion of the mixture. This is another example of an attempt to balance the phase separation that is inherent in high temperature polymer blends due to molecular conformation differences by strengthening the enthalpic interaction between the two polymers. [Pg.1468]

As expected, the C Is core level spectmm of bare perylene red substrate (Ru thickness of 0 run in Fig. 22.4) has only carbon peaks associated with the carbonyl and aromatic/aliphatic carbons there is no peak at 287 eV related to the ether (C-O) bonds. However, the C Is-Ru 3d core level spectra for ultrathin Ru loadings do clearly show the emergence of the new carbon peak at 287 eV, along with the BE shift and broadening of Ru 3d5/2 photoemission. The obtained XPS data confirm the occurrence of a Ru interaction with perylene red and formation of multiple mthe-nium oxidation states. The formation of Ru(CO)x- or Ru(OC)x-type bonds was further confirmed by the stoichiometry derived from curve fitting analysis. [Pg.644]

Because of the importance of aromatics/aliphatics separation and the problems associated with solvent extraction, possible alternatives have been studied. These include liquid membranes (Li, 1968 1971 Goswami et al., 1985), pervaporation (Hao et al., 1997), and the use of liquid inclusion complexes (Atwood, 1984). No selective sorbents are known for aromatics/aUphatics separation. It is, however, certainly possible to develop such sorbents based on jr-complexation. In the benzene molecule, the carbon atom is sp hybridized. Hence, each carbon has three sp orbitals and another Pz orbital. The six Pz orbitals in the benzene ring form the conjugative n bond. The Pz orbitals also form the antibonding n orbitals, which are not occupied. When benzene interacts with transition metals. [Pg.220]

FIGURE 21. Numerous macrocycles based on salicylideneamino alcohols, arising from (a and b) aliphatic and (c and d) aromatic amines, interacting with aryl boronic acids have been identified, (e) Analogous semianhydride bridged structures have also been observed. [Pg.277]

The magnitude of is related to the strength of the static dipolar interactions between the carbons and protons. Tch should be less than 0.13 ms for a rigid methylene group [71]. In general, TCH values decrease in the following order non-protonated carbons > methyl (rotating) carbons > methylene carbons > protonated aromatic-aliphatic methine carbons > methyl (static) carbons. [Pg.384]

Similar ligand-ligand interactions have been reported for a large number of ternary -amino acid complexes, built up of two different amino acid.s. A compilation of 72 examples is presented in reference 39. The extra stabilisation due to ligand-ligand interactions in these complexes depends on the character of the amino-acid side chains and amounts to 0.34 - 0.57 kJ/mole for combinations of aromatic and aliphatic side chains and 0.11 - 6.3 kJ/mole when arene - arene interactions are possible. ... [Pg.88]

In the presence of proton-donative organic solvents (alcohols), aliphatic amines do not react with diazonium, whereas aromatic amines form mainly triazenes and also para-aminoazo compounds, which subsequently interact slowly with an excess of diazo reagent via N-coupling and form disazo derivatives. [Pg.62]


See other pages where Aromatic-aliphatic interactions is mentioned: [Pg.65]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.1057]    [Pg.1057]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.861]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.88]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.65 , Pg.76 ]




SEARCH



Aliphatic—aromatic

Aromatic interactions

© 2024 chempedia.info