Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantum mechanics semi-empirical methods

Provides a survey of quantum mechanics, semi-empirical computational methods, and the application of molecular orbital theory to organic chemistry. The concepts explored in this book should be easy for most readers to understand. [Pg.3]

Thus, the mechanism of synthesis of the second stage of acidation of bicyclophosphites for the first time is studied by quantum-chemical semi empirical method MNDO. It is shown, that synthesis of this compound result of the coordinated interactions of acetyl chloride and 5-acetyloxymethyl-2-chlorine-5-ethyl-l,2,3-dioxa-phosphorynan on the mechanism of nucleophyhc substitution SN2. It is positioned, that this reaction is endothermic and has barrier character. It will qualitatively be coordinated with experiment. The size of an energy barrier of smdied reaction is equal 176 kDg/mol. [Pg.19]

The problem with most quantum mechanical methods is that they scale badly. This means that, for instance, a calculation for twice as large a molecule does not require twice as much computer time and resources (this would be linear scaling), but rather 2" times as much, where n varies between about 3 for DFT calculations to 4 for Hartree-Fock and very large numbers for ab-initio techniques with explicit treatment of electron correlation. Thus, the size of the molecules that we can treat with conventional methods is limited. Linear scaling methods have been developed for ab-initio, DFT and semi-empirical methods, but only the latter are currently able to treat complete enzymes. There are two different approaches available. [Pg.394]

Covers theory and applications of ah initio quantum mechanics calculations. The discussions are useful for understanding the differences between ah initio and semi-empirical methods. Although both sections are valuable, the discussion of the applications oi ah initio theory fills a void. It includes comparisons between experiment and many types and levels of calculation. The material is helpful in determining strategies for, and the validity of. ah initio calculations. [Pg.3]

HyperChem quantum mechanics calculations must start with the number of electrons (N) and how many of them have alpha spins (the remaining electrons have beta spins). HyperChem obtains this information from the charge and spin multiplicity that you specify in the Semi-empirical Options dialog box or Ab Initio Options dialog box. N is then computed by counting the electrons (valence electrons in semi-empirical methods and all electrons in fll) mitio method) associated with each (assumed neutral) atom and... [Pg.44]

The algorithms of the mixed classical-quantum model used in HyperChem are different for semi-empirical and ab mi/io methods. The semi-empirical methods in HyperChem treat boundary atoms (atoms that are used to terminate a subset quantum mechanical region inside a single molecule) as specially parameterized pseudofluorine atoms. However, HyperChem will not carry on mixed model calculations, using ab initio quantum mechanical methods, if there are any boundary atoms in the molecular system. Thus, if you would like to compute a wavefunction for only a portion of a molecular system using ab initio methods, you must select single or multiple isolated molecules as your selected quantum mechanical region, without any boundary atoms. [Pg.108]

Semi-empirical methods could thus treat the receptor portion of a single protein molecule as a quantum mechanical region but ab mdio methods cannot. However, both semi-empirical and ab initio methods could treat solvents as a perturbation on a quantum mechanical solute. In the future, HyperChem may have an algorithm for correctly treating the boundary between a classical region and an ab mdio quantum mechanical region in the same molecule. For the time being it does not. [Pg.109]

The semi-empirical methods of HyperChem are quantum mechanical methods that can describe the breaking and formation of chemical bonds, as well as provide information about the distribution of electrons in the system. HyperChem s molecular mechanics techniques, on the other hand, do not explicitly treat the electrons, but instead describe the energetics only as interactions among the nuclei. Since these approximations result in substantial computational savings, the molecular mechanics methods can be applied to much larger systems than the quantum mechanical methods. There are many molecular properties, however, which are not accurately described by these methods. For instance, molecular bonds are neither formed nor broken during HyperChem s molecular mechanics computations the set of fixed bonds is provided as input to the computation. [Pg.159]

For small molecules, the accuracy of solutions to the Schrodinger equation competes with the accuracy of experimental results. However, these accurate ab initio calculations require enormous computation and are only suitable for the molecular systems with small or medium size. Ab initio calculations for very large molecules are beyond the realm of current computers, so HyperChem also supports semi-empirical quantum mechanics methods. Semi-empirical approximate solutions are appropriate and allow extensive chemical exploration. The inaccuracy of the approximations made in semi-empirical methods is offset to a degree by recourse to experimental data in defining the parameters of the method. Indeed, semi-empirical methods can sometimes be more accurate than some poorer ab initio methods, which require much longer computation times. [Pg.217]

Ab initio methods, unlike either molecular mechanics or semi-empirical methods, use no experimental parameters in their computations. Instead, their computations are based solely on the laws of quantum mechanics—the first principles referred to in the name ah initio—and on the values of a small number of physical constants ... [Pg.5]

The choices of quantum mechanical method typically include the semi-empirical methods AMI, PM3, and MNDO/d [1-A. These three methods (and some of their variations) are those most commonly used in the current literature. Of these semi-empirical methods, only MNDO/d includes the effects of d-orbitals. Some of the problems associated with these semiempirical methods include ... [Pg.152]

Hpp describes the primary system by a quantum-chemical method. The choice is dictated by the system size and the purpose of the calculation. Two approaches of using a finite computer budget are found If an expensive ab-initio or density functional method is used the number of configurations that can be afforded is limited. Hence, the computationally intensive Hamiltonians are mostly used in geometry optimization (molecular mechanics) problems (see, e. g., [66]). The second approach is to use cheaper and less accurate semi-empirical methods. This is the only choice when many conformations are to be evaluated, i. e., when molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo calculations with meaningful statistical sampling are to be performed. The drawback of semi-empirical methods is that they may be inaccurate to the extent that they produce qualitatively incorrect results, so that their applicability to a given problem has to be established first [67]. [Pg.55]

Density functional theory (DFT),32 also a semi-empirical method, is capable of handling medium-sized systems of biological interest, and it is not limited to the second row of the periodic table. DFT has been used in the study of some small protein and peptide surfaces. Nevertheless, it is still limited by computer speed and memory. DFT offers a quantum mechanically based approach from a fundamentally different perspective, using electron density with an accuracy equivalent to post Hartree-Fock theory. The ideas have been around for many years,33 34 but only in the last ten years have numerous studies been published. DFT, compared to ab initio... [Pg.38]

It should be added that our inability, so far, to obtain reliable weights for the structures (i) to (v) does not prevent us from using empirical, or semi-empirical methods. As early as 1949 Pauling [24] had used an empirical relation between bond order and bond length to estimate the covalent character of H 02 as a function of the lengths of 01—H and H 02. The value which he found for the Ox 02 distance 2 70 A, was similar to that subsequently obtained in the more detailed calculations of Tsubomtjra [21]. Pauling s work was considerably extended by Coulson and Danielsson [25] who used alternative empirical relations, and found substantially the same values. However, in all this work, and in the quantum-mechanical calculations which followed [23], the only structures considered were (i), (ii) and (iv). Tsubomura seems to be the only person to have included all five structures. The essential role played by (iv) was noticed some time ago by Sokolov [26]. [Pg.348]

The construction of exchange correlation potentials and energies becomes a task for which not much guidance can be obtained from fundamental theory. The form of dependence on the electron density is generally not known and can only to a limited extent be obtained from theoretical considerations. The best one can do is to assume some functional dependence on the density with parameters to satisfy some consistency criteria and to fit calculated results to some model systems for which applications of proper quantum mechanical theory can be used as comparisons. At best this results in some form of ad-hoc semi-empirical method, which may be used with success for simulations of molecular ground state properties, but is certainly not universal. [Pg.40]

Before any computational study on molecular properties can be carried out, a molecular model needs to be established. It can be based on an appropriate crystal structure or derived using any other technique that can produce a valid model for a given compound, whether or not it has been prepared. Molecular mechanics is one such technique and, primarily for reasons of computational simplicity and efficiency, it is the most widely used. Quantum mechanical modeling of metal complexes with ab-initio or semi-empirical methods often remains prohibitive because these methods are so computationally intensive. The approximations that are introduced in order to reduce central processing unit (CPU) time and allow quantum mechanical calculations to be used routinely are often severe and such calculations are then less reliable. [Pg.2]

Ab-initio quantum mechanics calculations are, because of the computational cost, impractical for large transition metal compounds. In semi-empirical methods, some of the quantities of ab-initio calculations are neglected or replaced by para-... [Pg.12]


See other pages where Quantum mechanics semi-empirical methods is mentioned: [Pg.38]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.154]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.12 , Pg.15 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.12 , Pg.13 , Pg.15 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.12 , Pg.15 ]




SEARCH



Computational quantum mechanics semi-empirical methods

Empiric method

Mechanical methods

Method empirical

Quantum mechanical method

Quantum mechanics semi-empirical

Quantum methods

Quantum semi-empirical

Semi-empirical

Semi-empirical methods

Semi-empirical quantum mechanical methods

Semi-empirical quantum mechanical methods

© 2024 chempedia.info