Classical physics scales

Classical physics remains an excellent approximation to much of the behaviour of bodies on a macroscopic scale. It is in the microscopic realm that the quantum theory is essential. The behaviour of electrons in atoms and molecules, and the nature of the chemical bond, are among the problems that classical physics is unable to describe. It was only following the development of the quantum theory that chemists could really use physical ideas to provide a satisfactory understanding of their own problems. 

In the first years of 1900, however, physicists started studying the structure of atoms and soon realised that it was impossible to describe them with models of either particles or waves. Those models were inevitable in classical physics, and their failure could only mean that that physics is not valid at the atomic scale. The laws which apply to one level of reality are not necessarily valid at other levels, but this did not stop the unification process. In the end, quantum mechanics did manage to account for the atomic world, and it turned out that it could also explain the results of classical physics, which means that a bridge can actually be built between different levels of reality. A new synthesis, in other words, became possible because the quantum description of nature was able to contain, as a particular case, the description of classical physics. 

Refutes classical physics on the atomic scale 1.7 Wavefunctions and Energy Levels Classical trajectories -> Precisely defined paths... 

A second similar consequence of the continuum hypothesis is an uncertainty in the boundary conditions to be used in conjunction with the resulting equations for motion and heat transfer. With the continuum hypothesis adopted, the conservation principles of classical physics, listed earlier, will be shown to provide a set of so-called field equations for molecular average variables such as the continuum point velocity u. To solve these equations, however, the values of these variables or their derivatives must be specified at the boundaries of the fluid domain. These boundaries may be solid surfaces, the phase boundary between a liquid and a gas, or the phase boundary between two liquids. In any case, when viewed on the molecular scale, the boundaries are seen to be regions of rapid but continuous variation in fluid properties such as number density. Thus, in a molecular theory, boundary conditions would not be necessary. When viewed with the much coarser resolution of the macroscopic or continuum description, on the other hand, these local variations of density (and other molecular variables) can be distinguished only as discontinuities, and the continuum (or molecular average) variables such as u appear to vary smoothly on the scale L, right up to the boundary where some boundary condition is applied. 

We have compared the birth of quantum theory to a drama written and acted by Planck, Einstein, Bohr, and de Broglie. Indeed they inherited a critical mind with a deep insight into the quantum theory and they pursued continuously the development of this concept. From their research in that fertile period of time, we can study the inner workings of their considerations as human beings. Taking advantage of the failure of classical mechanics, they created a new concept. In the formation process of the quantum theory, they never denied the system of classical physics. The new physical system which they constructed included classical physics and grew to such a scale that it exerted a tremendous influence upon all science fields for nearly a century. 

At the size scale that we live in — the big stuff that we see in everyday life (the macro world) — there s a set of physics laws that we use to help us understand the processes around us. These are called the laws of classical physics, that allow us to understand tides, the effect of gravity, and lots more. You can test these theories in your backyard, if you want to. 

Microscopic-Macroscopic. These concepts of Formal Object and organization levels are new. There is obviously an implicit scale of complexity in classical physics, but levels are not explicitly formalized and generalized to all domains. If they are, they are thought in terms of size, as for the distinction microscopic-macroscopic that delimits the quantum world from the classical one. Here, this classical distinction is made differently between the singletons and the poles, that is to say in terms of individual or collective behavior, whatever the physical size. A large object may behave in a quantum way, provided that its behavior is not collective (Which is beyond the behavior of a pair or a few objects.)... 

At the end of the nineteenth century, scientists began to realize that the laws of classical physics were incompatible with a number of new experiments that probed the nature of atoms and molecules and their interaction with light. Through the work of a number of scientists over the first three decades of the twentieth century, a new theory—quantum mechanics—was developed that was able to explain the behavior of objects on the atomic and molecular scale. 

If the physical scale of the ligands introduces complexities which were not of concern to Werner, the nature of the donor sites on these intermediate scale ligands adds no complexities. Structures 1, 2, and 3 could stand as representatives of the vast majority of the complexing sites for metal ions, (M), with many O and a few N donor atoms. Sulfide sites and simple halide ions are the other donors of lesser importance. Consequently, we need to anticipate nothing in the bonding of the ligand to the metal that was not exhibited in the complexes known to Alfred Werner. This soil/water system chemistry is the chemistry of classical complexes, mainly between metal ions and hard base ligands. 

At this scale, the operation is in the realm of quantum mechanical physics rather than classical physics, and the effects associated with that scale are very different from those that occur on a larger scale. The most important difference ties in what is meant by the word surface. ... 

Classical or Newtonian physics describes nature on the macroscopic scales of time, mass, and energy—measured in seconds, kilograms, and joules—to which we are most accustomed. Quantum mechanics and relativity describe deviations from classical mechanics, but they operate more subtly in our experience because their effects are strongest at energy scales much smaller (quantum) or much larger (relativity) than we normally perceive with our own senses. Our interest in this volume is at the microscopic scale, which we will take to mean the scale of individual atoms and molecules distances of a few nanometers or less, masses less than 1000 atomic mass units, and energies of no more than about 10 J. Nevertheless, Isaac Newton s laws of motion for macroscopic bodies are often indispensable in visualizing the motions of microscopic entities, such as individual electrons, atoms, and molecules, sometimes with no adjustment at all. Therefore, it may be useful to review a few topics from classical physics that will show up in the text. 

In 1911, Rutherford s alpha-particle scattering experiments were controversial. In the Rutherford model of the atom, all of the positive charge was crammed into the dense, tiny nucleus. Like charges repel, so the nucleus of the atoms should not be stable, yet it was. The relationships of classical physics that worked so well in explaining large-scale systems did not work on atom-sized systems. Thus, someone had to develop a new approach to understanding the atom. The breakthrough that was needed was the development of the field of study now known as quantum mechanics. 

From a structural point ofview, we are typically talking about sphere-like particles with a known or a designed size distribution. This may facilitate any structural reconstruction, as spheres are amongst the most commonly studied particle shapes and interactions in industrial applications. Nevertheless, it has been observed that there are interactions between both materials (core and shell) that increase the catalytic property of the material. Again, at this nano-scale, classical physics might not be the way forward and interactions at the energy level should be considered in any attempt to predict effective properties in structures made with core-shell catalysts. 

There are several gas-well fields that produce hydrocarbon gas associated with very high TDS connate waters. Classical oilfield scale problems (e.g., calcium carbonate, barium sulfate, and calcium sulfate) are minimal in these fields. Halite (NaCl), however, can be precipitated to such an extent that production is lost in hours. As a result, a bottom-hole fluid sample is retrieved from all new wells. Unstable components are "fixed" immediately after sampling, and pH is determined under pressure. A full ionic and physical analysis is also carried out in the laboratory. 

Quantum mechanics is the theory that captures the particle-wave duality of matter. Quantum mechanics applies in the microscopic realm, that is, at length scales and at time scales relevant to subatomic particles like electrons and nuclei. It is the most successful physical theory it has been verified by every experiment performed to check its validity. It is iso the most counter-intuitive physical theory, since its premises are at variance with our everyday experience, which is based on macroscopic observations that obey the laws of classical physics. When the properties of physical objects (such as solids, clusters and molecules) are studied at a resolution at which the atomic degrees of freedom are explicitly involved, the use of quantum mechanics becomes necessary. 

Similarity Variables The physical meaning of the term similarity relates to internal similitude, or self-similitude. Thus, similar solutions in boundaiy-layer flow over a horizontal flat plate are those for which the horizontal component of velocity u has the property that two velocity profiles located at different coordinates x differ only by a scale factor. The mathematical interpretation of the term similarity is a transformation of variables carried out so that a reduction in the number of independent variables is achieved. There are essentially two methods for finding similarity variables, separation of variables (not the classical concept) and the use of continuous transformation groups. The basic theoiy is available in Ames (see the references). 

The overall objective of this chapter is to review the fundamental issues involved in the transport of macromolecules in hydrophilic media made of synthetic or naturally occurring uncharged polymers with nanometer-scale pore structure when an electric field is applied. The physical and chemical properties and structural features of hydrophilic polymeric materials will be considered first. Although the emphasis will be on classical polymeric gels, discussion of polymeric solutions and nonclassical gels made of, for example, un-cross-linked macromolecular units such as linear polymers and micelles will also be considered in light of recent interest in these materials for a number of applications... 

---