Choice of Spectrometer

The information content of a particular spectroscopic method, its sensitivity, and its ease of implementation are all important considerations. The utility of combining more than one complementary spectroscopic method is also an issue that requires serious consideration. 

Serious consideration must be given to the use of more than one vibrational spectrometer. The list of currently available commercial vibrational spectrometers include NIR and NIR-CD, MIR and MIR-CD, FIR, Raman and Raman Optical Activity (RAO). Diasteriomers have distinct non-circularly polarized vibrational spectra. Enantiomers are only distinguishable by CD and RAO [51, 52]. If a synthesis is performed vhere enantiomers are present, then a proper experimental design is needed to solve Eq. (2), and this necessitates the use of CD/ROA. If CD/ROA is not used, then one or more of the pure component spectra ai..asobs are lumped parameters i. e. they represent both enantiomers present. 

1) With regard to isotopomers, tw o sub-categories arise. The first is the natural abundance isotopomer distribution of the organics and organometallics. The second is specific isotopic labeling. Normally, the pure component spectra recovered are lumped para- 

The limitations of NMR include the inability to directly distinquish enantiomers the addition of a chiral shift reagent or chiral solvating agent is necessary. Also, polymeric materials, where a large distribution of molecules are present, must be treated as a lumped parameter. At the moment, the biggest limitation of NMR seems to be that that the chemical shifts are perhaps too sensitive to local environment. Consequently, the signals are too non-stationary in position, and Eq. (2) becomes intractable in many, but not all, cases. 

ERR is a powerful tool for unpaired electron/radical studies [55]. Therefore, EPR has the potential to fill a unique niche in the solution of Eq. (2). Only the subset of species that are radicals are accessible (dim Sq s dim S). EPR is also promising because it produces localized signals rather than broad signals. 

---

We shall develop the theory necessary to understand quasioptics, but before that, it will be useful to consider factors that influence the choice of spectrometer components such as the magnet, the source, and the detector. In Section II we will give a brief review of the performance and characteristics of homodyne detectors. In our discussion of sources, we will discuss vacuum oscillators, such as the reflex klystron and backward wave oscillator, and solid-state sources, such as the Gunn diode. We will also discuss useful criteria for selecting a magnet. 

The choice of a mass spectrometer to fulfill any particular task must take into account the nature of the substances to be examined, the degree of separation required for mixtures, the types of ion source and inlet systems, and the types of mass analyzer. Once these individual requirements have been defined, it is much easier to discriminate among the numerous commercial instruments that are available. Once suitable mass spectrometers have been identified, it is then often a case of balancing capital and running costs, reUability, ea.se of routine use, after-sales service, and manufacturer reputation. 

The choice of mass spectrometer for a particular analysis depends on the namre of the sample and the desired results. For low detection limits, high mass resolution, or stigmatic imaging, a magnetic sector-based instrument should be used. The analysis of dielectric materials (in many cases) or a need for ultrahigh depth resolution requires the use of a quadrupole instrument. 

Diphenylcarbazide as adsorption indicator, 358 as colorimetric reagent, 687 Diphenylthiocarbazone see Dithizone Direct reading emission spectrometer 775 Dispensers (liquid) 84 Displacement titrations 278 borate ion with a strong acid, 278 carbonate ion with a strong acid, 278 choice of indicators for, 279, 280 Dissociation (ionisation) constant 23, 31 calculations involving, 34 D. of for a complex ion, (v) 602 for an indicator, (s) 718 of polyprotic acids, 33 values for acids and bases in water, (T) 832 true or thermodynamic, 23 Distribution coefficient 162, 195 and per cent extraction, 165 Distribution ratio 162 Dithiol 693, 695, 697 Dithizone 171, 178... 

Universal and selective detectors, linked to GC or LC systems, have remained the predominant choice of analysts for the past two decades for the determination of pesticide residues in food. Although the introduction of bench-top mass spectrometers has enabled analysts to produce more unequivocal residue data for most pesticides, in many laboratories the use of selective detection methods, such as flame photometric detection (FPD), electron capture detection (BCD) and alkali flame ionization detection (AFID) or nitrogen-phosphorus detection (NPD), continues. Many of the new technologies associated with the on-going development of instrumental methods are discussed. However, the main objective of this section is to describe modern techniques that have been demonstrated to be of use to the pesticide residue analyst. 

Specificity is unsurpassed. Traditionally, MS was performed on very large and expensive high-resolution sector instruments operated by experienced specialists. The introduction of low-resolution (1 amu), low-cost, bench-top mass spectrometers in the early 1980s provided analysts with a robust analytical tool with a more universal range of application. Two types of bench-top mass spectrometers have predominated the quadrupole or mass-selective detector (MSD) and the ion-trap detector (ITD). These instruments do not have to be operated by specialists and can be utilized routinely by residue analysts after limited training. The MSD is normally operated in the SIM mode to increase detection sensitivity, whereas the ITD is more suited to operate in the full-scan mode, as little or no increase in sensitivity is gained by using SIM. Both MSDs and ITDs are widely used in many laboratories for pesticide residue analyses, and the preferred choice of instrument can only be made after assessment of the performance for a particular application. 

The corresponding liquid-phase chemistry can be used to promote ion formation by appropriate choice of solvent and pH, salt addition to form M.Na+ or M.NH4+, and postcolumn addition of reagents. The primary applications of ESI-MS are in the biopolymer field. The phenomenon of routine multiple charging is exclusive to electrospray, which makes it a very valuable technique in the fine chemical and biochemical field, because mass spectrometers can analyse high-molecular-mass samples without any need to extend their mass range, and without any loss of sensitivity. However, with ESI, molecules are not always produced with a distribution of charge states [137], Nevertheless, this phenomenon somehow complicates the determination of the true mass of the unknown. With conventional low-resolution mass spectrometers, the true mass of the macromolecule is determined by an indirect and iterative computational method. 

In both cases, either conventional FTIR transmission or diffuse reflection detection may be used. Because TLC and the postspectroscopic evaluation are not linked directly, few compromises have to be made with regard to the choice of the solvent system employed for separation. Chromatographic selectivity and efficiency are not influenced by the needs of the detector. The TLC plate allows the separation to be made in a different site from the laboratory where the separated analytes are evaluated. The fact that the sample is static on the plate, rather than moving with the flow of a mobile phase, also puts less demand on the spectrometer. The popularity of TLC-IR derives in part from its low cost. 

With most spectrometers, you have a choice of either 100 kHz or a lower frequency of field modulation. The higher frequency generally gives better S/N, but if the lines are unusually sharp (<0.08 Gauss), 100 kHz modulation leads to side bands , lumps in the line shape that confuse the interpretation of the spectrum. This effect is illustrated in Figure 1.12. Under such circumstances, use the lower frequency for which the sidebands are closer together and thus less likely to be a problem. 

Photoionization ti me-of-fli ght mass spectrometry is almost exclusively the method used in chemical reaction studies. The mass spectrometers, detectors and electronics are almost identical. A major distinction is the choice of ionizing frequency and intensity. For many stable molecules multi photon ionization allowed for almost unit detection efficiency with controllable fragmentation(20). For cluster systems this has been more difficult because high laser intensities generally cause extensive dissociation of neutrals and ions(21). This has forced the use of single photon ionization. This works very well for low i oni zati on potential metals ( < 7.87 eV) if the intensity is kept fairly low. In fact for most systems the ionizing laser must be attenuated. A few very small... 

---