Catalytic reactions influencing factors

The rate at which each of these steps occurs ultimately determines the distribution of the participating species (reactants and products) in the system in addition, it plays a major role in determining the over-all rate of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. The factors and effects influencing each of these rates is considered in the next four sections. The final section is concerned with analyzing and determining the controlling step or steps for the reaction in question. This topic will be reviewed qualitatively since much of this material is both difficult and complex a qualitative presentation is beyond the scope of this text. 

Figure 10 shows that Tj is a unique function of the Thiele modulus. When the modulus ( ) is small (- SdSl), the effectiveness factor is unity, which means that there is no effect of mass transport on the rate of the catalytic reaction. When ( ) is greater than about 1, the effectiveness factor is less than unity and the reaction rate is influenced by mass transport in the pores. When the modulus is large (- 10), the effectiveness factor is inversely proportional to the modulus, and the reaction rate (eq. 19) is proportional to k ( ), which, from the definition of ( ), implies that the rate and the observed reaction rate constant are proportional to (1 /R)(f9This result shows that both the rate constant, ie, a measure of the intrinsic activity of the catalyst, and the effective diffusion coefficient, ie, a measure of the resistance to transport of the reactant offered by the pore stmcture, influence the rate. It is not appropriate to say that the reaction is diffusion controlled it depends on both the diffusion and the chemical kinetics. In contrast, as shown by equation 3, a reaction in solution can be diffusion controlled, depending on D but not on k. 

This approach of using 2D and 3D monodisperse nanoparticles in catalytic reaction studies ushers in a new era that will permit the identification of the molecular and structural features of selectivity [4,9]. Metal particle size, nanoparticle surface-structure, oxide-metal interface sites, selective site blocking, and hydrogen pressure have been implicated as important factors influencing reaction selectivity. We believe additional molecular ingredients of selectivity will be uncovered by coupling the synthesis of monodisperse nanoparticles with simultaneous studies of catalytic reaction selectivity as a function of the structural properties of these model nanoparticle catalyst systems. 

Our aim is to disclose the mechanism of the photocatalytic effect. It is necessary first to understand why and how illumination, in general, influences the course of a heterogeneous catalytic reaction by stimulating or, on the contrary, retarding it. One has to understand why the effect is positive in some cases (acceleration of the reaction) and negative in others (retardation of the reaction), and how the sign of the effect is determined. Furthermore, it is necessary to find out upon what factors, and in what manner, the magnitude of the effect depends. We shall try to answer all these questions. 

Nowadays, a number of commercial suppliers [20] offer ionic liquids, some of them in larger quantities, [21] and the quality of commercial ionic liquid samples has clearly improved in recent years. The fact that small amounts of impurities significantly influence the properties of the ionic liquid and especially its usefulness for catalytic reactions [22] makes the quality of an ionic liquid an important consideration [23]. Without any doubt the improved commercial availability of ionic liquids is a key factor for the strongly increasing interest in this new class of liquid materials. 

A key aspect of metal oxides is that they possess multiple functional properties acid-base, electron transfer and transport, chemisorption by a and 7i-bonding of hydrocarbons, O-insertion and H-abstraction, etc. This multi-functionality allows them to catalyze complex selective multistep transformations of hydrocarbons, as well as other catalytic reactions (NO,c conversion, for example). The control of the catalyst multi-functionality requires the ability to control not only the nanostructure, e.g. the nano-scale environment around the active site, " but also the nano-architecture, e.g. the 3D spatial organization of nano-entities. The active site is not the only relevant aspect for catalysis. The local area around the active site orients or assists the coordination of the reactants, and may induce sterical constrains on the transition state, and influences short-range transport (nano-scale level). Therefore, it plays a critical role in determining the reactivity and selectivity in multiple pathways of transformation. In addition, there are indications pointing out that the dynamics of adsorbed species, e.g. their mobility during the catalytic processes which is also an important factor determining the catalytic performances in complex surface reaction, " is influenced by the nanoarchitecture. 

The synthesis and characterization of the structural defects within aluminosilicate mesoporous materials were provided. We further discussed the fascinating adsorption-desorption hysteresis behaviors and the influencing factors in the formation of the structural defects. However, mesoporous MCM-41 can act as catalyst support for many catalytic reactions, especially involve bulk oiganic molecules, due to its large surface area and pore size. The ability to synthetically control the connectivity of the mesoporous materials may have important applications in catalysis. 

It is rare that a catalyst can be chosen for a reaction such that it is entirely specific or unique in its behaviour. More often than not products additional to the main desired product are generated concomitantly. The ratio of the specific chemical rate constant of a desired reaction to that for an undesired reaction is termed the kinetic selectivity factor (which we shall designate by 5) and is of central importance in catalysis. Its magnitude is determined by the relative rates at which adsorption, surface reaction and desorption occur in the overall process and, for consecutive reactions, whether or not the intermediate product forms a localised or mobile adsorbed complex with the surface. In the case of two parallel competing catalytic reactions a second factor, the thermodynamic factor, is also of importance. This latter factor depends exponentially on the difference in free energy changes associated with the adsorption-desorption equilibria of the two competing reactants. The thermodynamic factor also influences the course of a consecutive reaction where it is enhanced by the ability of the intermediate product to desorb rapidly and also the reluctance of the catalyst to re-adsorb the intermediate product after it has vacated the surface. 

As applied to catalysis, the microkinetic analysis of catalytic reactions is used most often. This is an instrument of an idealized description of com plex catalytic processes without consideration of the mass transfer that can affect considerably the observed kinetics of the catalytic transformations. The microkinetic analysis with the necessary consideration of the active sites balance for all types of active centers of the catalyst, even though it has several drawbacks, can provide important information about the potential influence of the very different thermodynamic factors. 

On heating, many hydrides dissociate reversibly into the metal and Hj gas. The rate of gas evolution is a function of both temperature and /KH2) but will proceed to completion if the volatile product is removed continuously [1], which is experimentally difficult in many systems. The combination of hydrogen atoms at the metal surface to yield Hj may be slow [2] and is comparable with many heterogeneous catalytic reactions. While much is known about the mobility of H within many metallic hydride phases, the gas evolution step is influenced by additional rate controlling factors. Depending on surface conditions, the surface-to-volume ratio and the impurities present, the rate of Hj release may be determined by either the rate at which hydrogen arrives at the solid-gas inteifece (diffusion control), or by the rate of desorption. 

Elucidation of the mechanism of the catalytic process is a relatively complicated task because of the variety of factors influencing the catalytic reaction. For instance, preconcentration of redox species in the porous films can result in an apparent surface excess, similar to adsorption. Here, semi-integral analysis of voltammetric curves can aid in separating diffusional and surface-confined components (Freund and Brajter-Toth, 1992). 

Although the belief that steric factors influence norbomene extrusion is reasonable and supported by Catellani s studies, it is entirely possible that norbomene carbopalladation and extrusion are reversible processes. If so, a species related to 4 may be trapped as the mono-o/t/to-alkylated product. Although mono-functionalization has been observed in stoichiometric studies by Catellani [31, 42], catalytic reactions generally do not afford monoalkylated products. Interestingly, Lautens has shown that in some particular systems mono-alkylation is possible, which may occur as a result of a sterically congested system (Scheme 14) [44], This does lend some evidence to the possibility that norbomene carbopalladation and extrusion are reversible steps, and may occur between ortho functionalization steps. 

It has now been shown that the catalytic activity of a metal may vary greatly with face, both in the case where rearrangement of the surface occurs and where it apparently does not. Obviously catalysis depends on many factors, each of which must be investigated but the face exposed at the surface plays such a controlling role that there seems to be little chance at this time of understanding the basic mechanisms of catalysis until the influence of face on a number of catalytic reactions of different types is determined experimentally. 

The views so far presented in this chapter may be summarized as being based upon the primary formation of addition compounds when two or more molecules react, these addition compounds then breaking down to form new molecules. In catalytic reactions, the first stage of the reaction is the same, but. in the second stage, one of the substances formed in the breaking down of the intermediate compound is identical in composition with one of the substances which took part initially in the reaction in the formation of the addition compound. While the experimental evidence is favorable to this view of catalytic reactions in many cases, it may be objected that physical influences may often modify the velocity of the reaction between gases. At present there is no experimental evidence of any kind available to prove or disprove the formation of definite chemical compounds in such cases, but on the other hand, evidence is accumulating that adsorption (or perhaps the solution of a gas or a liquid in a solid) is the important factor here. Just how far phenomena of this nature may be identical with the formation of definite chemical compounds (possibly so-called loose combinations) on a surface is not at present certain, but until direct evidence is obtained that such reactions must be included in a... 

---