Blank run approach

The validity of any statement about the purity of a protein is directly linked to the quality of the analytical method used. The validation of immunoassay systems to detect protein impurities in rDNA pharmaceuticals must be achieved by careful production and characterization of the assay reagents. The studies presented here demonstrate that the blank run approach is reasonable for the isolation of reference materials and that high quality broad spectrum antisera can be produced to these mixtures. Significant improvements in assay sensitivity approaching the ppb level are attainable and should provide the methods to further improve product purity. 

Potassium Dichromate, 0.1 N (4.903 g K2Cr207 per 1000 mL) Dissolve about 5 g of potassium dichromate (K2Cr207) in 1000 mL of water, transfer quantitatively 25 mL of this solution to a 500-mL glass-stoppered flask, add 2 g of potassium iodide (free from iodate) (KI), dilute with 200 mL of water, add 5 mL of hydrochloric acid, and mix. Allow to stand for 10 min in a dark place, and titrate the liberated iodine with 0.1 N Sodium Thiosulfate, adding Starch TS as the endpoint is approached. Correct for a blank run on the same quantities of the same reagents, and calculate the normality. 

Attachment of the Pyrolysis System. The attachment of a pyrolyzer to a GC system should be made so that minimum dead volume remains in the system. Dead volume can be tested for by injection of methane into the GC column a tailing methane peak indicates the existence of dead volume. Such voids drastically reduce resolution and may also trap polar or more volatile fragments. The system should also be tested for contamination from previous runs by firing the pyrolyzer without sample. Generally, such a blank run should be made from time to time to ensure the absence of memory effects. A typical configuration of the so-called on-line approach is presented in Fig. 4.7.4. 

The manufacturer recommends that the sample be kept at 500 C under oxygen for one hour to complete combustion. However, when these recommendations were followed, tritium was measured in those blank runs that followed the analysis of sludge pellets or amended soil. Extending the burn time to 90 minutes and increasing the temperature to 550 C, reduced but did not eliminate this carry over. Extending the final burn period to more than 90 minutes would have made it impossible to complete a run within a working day. Finally it was decided to continue the final bum overnight. This approach eliminated the problem. 

Pipette 25 mL of the standard 0.1 M silver nitrate into a 250 mL conical flask, add 5mL of 6M nitric acid and 1 mL of the iron(III) indicator solution. Run in the potassium or ammonium thiocyanate solution from a burette. At first a white precipitate is produced, rendering the liquid of a milky appearance, and as each drop of thiocyanate falls in, it produces a reddish-brown cloud, which quickly disappears on shaking. As the end point approaches, the precipitate becomes flocculent and settles easily finally one drop of the thiocyanate solution produces a faint brown colour, which no longer disappears upon shaking. This is the end point. The indicator blank amounts to 0.01 mL ofO.lM silver nitrate. It is essential to shake vigorously during the titration in order to obtain correct results. ... 

First Control Run. A large number (7 to 15) of sets of standards and blanks are run and the results tabulated, as in the trial runs. These data are then plotted (responses vs. concentration for all data points, on one graph) and the means, standard deviations, RSDs, the slope, y-intercept, and correlation coefficient are determined. The smaller the value of the y-intercept, the better (the less chance for a contamination or interference problem). The closer the slope is to 1, the better (the more sensitive). At higher concentrations, the standard deviation should get larger, and the RSDs should get smaller (while approaching some limit). If the RSDs are between 30% and 100%, a close approach to the detection limit is indicated. 

As the end point is approached, Ti(III) color gets light, add 5ml of 20% ammonium thiocyanate (by cylinder), as an indicator and titrate to the appearance of the red color. Run a blank, substituting... 

Analytical methods for monitoring the compounds were developed or modified to permit the quantification of all 23 compounds of interest. As noted earlier, the compounds were initially studied in small-scale extractions by groups. This approach assured minimal interferences in the analyses conducted during the initial supercritical fluid carbon dioxide extractions. Table II summarizes the data on the recovery of organics from aqueous samples containing the compounds of interest at concentration levels listed in Table I when the sample preparation techniques and analytical methods described were used. For each experimental run, blank and spiked aqueous samples were carried through the sample prepration and analytical finish steps to ensure accurate and reproducible results. Analyses of sodium, calcium, and lead content were also conducted on selected samples by using standard atomic ab-... 

For this top-down approach, it is assumed that the quality control (QC) precision and recovery data have been collected over a sufficiently large number of runs and period of time to allow for natural variation of all factors that can affect the results. These factors include different analysts, analytical instruments, blank tissue lots, lot numbers of reagents, and preparations of standard solutions. Note that other factors that can affect analytical results, such as method bias, variations in the sample matrix, sampling, sample storage and treatment, subsampling, homogeneity, standard purity, and the preparation of standard solutions, are not included in this discussion. 

Limit of detection (LOD) is the lowest concentration of an analyte that the bioanalytical procedure can reliably differentiate from background noise. There are several approaches for determining the LOD (ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, 2005), but a common practice is to evaluate the variability of the analytical background response of blank samples. To estimate the LOD, run blank (e.g., assay buffer, zero calibrator) sample replicates (>6) across one or more runs and calculate the mean background value 2 SD or 3SD to define the LOD. Although commonly used to define the sensitivity of an assay, LOD should be used with caution because the value is defined in an inherently variable region of the curve and is based upon a user-defined calculation. 

---